Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Dance

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

One of a coupple of pictures i took yesterday night.

Brand:Canon
Camera:Canon EOS 7D
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:18 Jan 2012 - 6:51 PM
Focal Length:200mm
Aperture:f/5.6
Shutter Speed:1/2500sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:3200
Exposure Mode:Manual
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:On, Fired
Title:Dance
Username:leo_ms leo_ms
Uploaded:19 Jan 2012 - 6:30 AM
Tags:Close-up / macro, General, Specialist / abstract
VS Mode Rating 101 (60% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
JuniorJunior Member
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
ugly
ugly e2 Member 6ugly vcard United Kingdom55 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jan 2012 - 6:34 AM

Great image..
Love to colours and tones..
There a lot of detail..
A cracking image...
Well done...
Dave

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

LynneJoyce
LynneJoyce e2 Member 6LynneJoyce vcard United Kingdom98 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jan 2012 - 6:48 AM

Clever work.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

sherring
sherring  646 forum posts United Kingdom13 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jan 2012 - 8:46 AM

My only critique would be to remove that half of a large blob at the top of the image which is distracting.

Nice idea, well shot.

Steve.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

KarenFB
KarenFB Junior Gallery Team 84271 forum postsKarenFB vcard England163 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jan 2012 - 8:50 AM

A stunning image, one I would have been proud to capture! The colours and drops are fantastic.

Were this mine, I think I would be tempted to crop a little off the top (to remove the half drop) and I would also try to remove the slight 'noise' you have on the background. Both minor points and probably just me! Smile

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

franken
franken e2 Member 123108 forum postsfranken vcard Wales4 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jan 2012 - 9:43 AM

Excellent work.

Ken

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

perkyjude
perkyjude  346 forum posts England11 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jan 2012 - 10:22 AM

Incredible capture but I do agree with Karen FB - crop a bit off the top, I would actually take it down to just below the highest pink blob.. , and gently reduce the noise, I would try airbrushing carefully on just the background.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Chinga
Chinga e2 Member 3Chinga vcard United Kingdom
19 Jan 2012 - 1:36 PM

Very good work! IB

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

JackAllTog
JackAllTog e2 Member 53591 forum postsJackAllTog vcard United Kingdom58 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jan 2012 - 1:49 PM

Excellent.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10849 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2843 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jan 2012 - 4:08 PM

Well done image, and a good mod.



Regards

Willie

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

jamestheboy
19 Jan 2012 - 5:40 PM

This is a great looking image I like the way you have done this






james Smile

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

glsammy
glsammy  8194 forum posts United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jan 2012 - 7:08 PM

I like the overall image but I do wonder why you shot at ISO 3200 especially as you were using flash? You could have closed the lens down a bit to give better DOF, or perhaps you didn't want this. What I've learnt from trying to do water drops is to use low power flash, 1/64th power is one setting I often use. The flash does the job of freezing the subject without the need for a very high shutter speed. Of course you may be completely aware of this and I've missed the whole point of the shot!Wink
I'm reluctant to be too critical as my lack of artistic ability and knowledge is well knownGrin
I do like the colour mix, it works well. What did you use?

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

leo_ms
leo_ms  2 Germany
19 Jan 2012 - 7:29 PM

Thank you everyone for the great replies and i just took a similar picture which i will upload as soon as i can.
Maybe explaining some of my intentions to Glsammy, i shot at iso 3200 to get at least a decent dof, although i think this is far from beeing decent. For the lighting i used the flash at 1/128, but not to light the scene, but get reflections in the sculpture. Now for lighting itself i used two 500W oldfashion foto lamps, which i love to use ( they are my mothers old lamps from the 80's ) well this did provide a hell of a lot light, but i didnt think that i could go down with the shutter speed, because i didt want any motion blurr. So thats my explanation for the high ISO, and the small aperture, but as i said i managed o get a picture with a lot less noise, and generally a better picture i think.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

strokebloke
19 Jan 2012 - 8:31 PM

I'm very impressed.
Not only with the shot, which is excellent, as is the mod: but also with the whole tone of the critique. Pleasant. Well intentioned. Friendly.
Well done to one, and all. Smile

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  781 forum posts United Kingdom850 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jan 2012 - 9:34 PM

You say this is a sculpture? Looks like coloured water flying about, but not quite right in that respect. The image is effective indeed, and makes the viewer wonder - but I would like to know more. is it liquid, or is it a sculpture? In which case, why are there globules flying about. Your EXIF data is puzzling. You say you used 3200ISO to get a decent depth of field, but used f5.6 with a 200mm which is hardly going to give much depth when this close.

The shutter speed suggests freezing movement. I remain puzzled.

However, despite my confusion, this is a fine interesting image. I would like to know more though.

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

leo_ms
leo_ms  2 Germany
19 Jan 2012 - 9:46 PM

Good point you bring up there PaulbroadTongue
i should maybe explain
this i acryllic paint , watered down a little bit, placed on a membrane, which is attached to a pipe, on whichs other end i have attaced a spaker. Now if you play a sound, the membrane will oscillate, and the paint on the membrane will either jump and build struktures, or just fly off. Unfortunatly I dont have a macro lense, with which it would be easier to capture the scene, and i the lense i am usin right now is 70-200 which only allows me to go about 1.2 meters from the subject, thats the reason for the long focal length, and the high ISO.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

glsammy
glsammy  8194 forum posts United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jan 2012 - 10:22 PM


Quote: Good point you bring up there PaulbroadTongue
i should maybe explain
this i acryllic paint , watered down a little bit, placed on a membrane, which is attached to a pipe, on whichs other end i have attaced a spaker. Now if you play a sound, the membrane will oscillate, and the paint on the membrane will either jump and build struktures, or just fly off. Unfortunatly I dont have a macro lense, with which it would be easier to capture the scene, and i the lense i am usin right now is 70-200 which only allows me to go about 1.2 meters from the subject, thats the reason for the long focal length, and the high ISO.

Thank you for that info. Very interesting! I must try something similar.
You really don't need a fast shutter speed though when using flash. I manage to get crisp sharp water droplets using speeds of around 1/250sec, with an aperture of F14-16, only lit by two flash guns set at 1/64. The flash is good enough to freeze the shot.Smile
Here's an example: Water shot: That was actually ISO 200, F14.0 with a shutter speed of 1/250sec.Wink

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

strokebloke
19 Jan 2012 - 11:30 PM


Quote: Here's an example: Water shot:

I'm staggered that you received so few votes and not one single award.
I have never seen anything like that. How on earth did you capture the bowl of flowers in the waterdrop? Magical !!
There must have been some phenomenal shots around in 2007 to take awards away from that shot

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

glsammy
glsammy  8194 forum posts United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jan 2012 - 11:45 PM


Quote: Here's an example: Water shot:
I'm staggered that you received so few votes and not one single award.
I have never seen anything like that. How on earth did you capture the bowl of flowers in the waterdrop? Magical !!
There must have been some phenomenal shots around in 2007 to take awards away from that shot

Thank you for your comment. I never get many votes or awards. I assume they get what they deserve!Grin
Seriously, it took hundreds of efforts to get that shot and no matter how hard I try it still takes hundreds to get anything similar!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  781 forum posts United Kingdom850 Constructive Critique Points
20 Jan 2012 - 8:49 AM

Thanks for the info. Even more impressive then - I'm jealous. Fine work.

I never worry about votes - constructive comments are nice, but an analysis of the general galleries confirms you need to shoot pretty pictorial scenes - in the main - to get votes. I'm being cynical, but it is the image that counts. Your shot here, rightly, gets many comments and pretty general applause, and it deserves it.

On my hobby horse again - there are many images in the critique section which need firm helpful comment, and get next to nothing. Come on everyone, never mind votes - give good honest comment to those who need it as well as applauding superb photography such as this.

Off hobby horse....

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

ramakrishnan33
26 Jan 2012 - 3:17 PM

VERY EXCELLENT.... SHOT

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.