Distant Landscape

Photos > Gallery > Distant Landscape

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Shot of the moon low in the sky, 30 frames stacked

Title:Distant Landscape
Username:GT500 GT500
Uploaded:9 May 2009 - 8:01 AM
Camera:Canon EOS 400D
Lens:SkyWatcher 100 ED2 Pro telescope with 2xBarlow lens
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Tags:Landscape / travel, Specialist / abstract
Votes:7

Site Awards

User Awards

No Awards


Comments

borrower
4 Aug 2009 - 4:31 PM
0

WOW................... YOU ARE A SERIOUS PHOTOGRAPHER. LOOKS COLD UP THERE FANTASTIC

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
4 Aug 2009 - 4:34 PM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

macdaniel
4 Aug 2009 - 4:34 PM
0

what have you done with this as it looks dull and unsharp - did you forget to process a RAW file? Mark, what is stacking by the way. I have once made a similar moonshot (still in pf) with a telephoto lens of 300mm and that one is just crispy and sharp and comes near to what one sees through a binocular.

ianrobinson
ianrobinson (e2 Member)
2
811 forum postsianrobinson vcard United Kingdom7 Constructive Critique Points
12 Sep 2011 - 9:34 AM
0

You got my vote for the fact you got the exposure right but it is very soft.
There really is no need to stack that amount of images to create a sharp image and clearly it has not worked anyway, this is the whole reason you stack images so you can crop down and then by stacking you get a sharper image, this is generally done for far off images like planets through the telescope for example.
No need to stack the moon just get a good lens or a telescope that you can put your camera on simplesssssss.

Ian

chedd
chedd (e2 Member)
chedd vcard United Kingdom
1 Dec 2011 - 11:17 PM
0

I don't want to rain on anyone's parade here but................

Stacking is the process by which you attempt to nullify the problems associated with atmospheric turbulence. Take lots of frames ( maybe 40 - 50 FPS ) and over 60 seconds you will have several thousand stills that should be graded for clarity, stacked via mathematical algorithms and summed to produce a final image. This operation is generally not performed with a DSLR type camera but a specialist video chip that can output this kind of frame rate and fed into something like "registax".

The very notion ( to my knowledge ) that you can take accurate lunar photo's on a DSLR is fanciful.......... at best.

chedd
chedd (e2 Member)
chedd vcard United Kingdom
1 Dec 2011 - 11:18 PM
0

Sorry, I meant to add....we need to know the focal length here GT Smile

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.