Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Elegant Swan

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

New PortraitPro 12 SALE + 10% OFF code EPZROS814
Add Comment

Looking for comment on processing using photoshop, I already had some great advice given which has improved the quality when saving RAW data.

Brand:NIKON CORPORATION
Camera:Nikon D90 Check out Nikon Nation!
Lens:18.0-200.0 mm f/3.5-5.6
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:22 May 2012 - 3:22 PM
Focal Length:200mm
Lens Max Aperture:f/5.7
Aperture:f/5.6
Shutter Speed:1/250sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:200
Exposure Mode:Shutter speed priority AE
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:No Flash
Title:Elegant Swan
Username:HelenT4 HelenT4
Uploaded:2 Jun 2012 - 1:52 PM
Tags:Wildlife / nature
VS Mode Rating 101 (100% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10849 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2841 Constructive Critique Points
2 Jun 2012 - 9:57 PM

The white of the Swans neck is quite bright, and you cant see any detail in the feathers.


This is due to overexposure, so using a negative exposure compensation of perhaps -2/3 would have helped. It can be quite difficult to get the Swans white feathers right, and needs a bit of practice.


The composition is tight, and looks better if theres a little more space in front.

Using the highlight recovery tool in CS I was able to get the neck looking better with more detail, and Ive added a little space to the left.



Hope this helps,



regards



Willie

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Trev_B
Trev_B e2 Member 7110 forum postsTrev_B vcard England64 Constructive Critique Points
3 Jun 2012 - 12:46 AM

Hi Helen, Nice sharp focus on the eye, however Willie is right you have got the whites to bright.

Swans are notorious for getting the white feathers over exposed, but there are things you can do to overcome the problem. First shoot in Raw that will give you a couple of aperture stops lea way reducing the risk of slight overexposure. Do as Willie suggest and apply some negative EV, as you can always lighten the image later whilst retaining the plumage detail. Swans tend to be inquisitive and tend to come to you, so you should have plenty of time to try different exposure settings and lots of shots.

You obviously have a steady hand as the focus is spot on, don't be afraid to up the ISO so that you can uses faster shutter speeds and smaller apertures.

Trev

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  781 forum posts United Kingdom850 Constructive Critique Points
3 Jun 2012 - 9:27 AM

At first sight a strong well composed image, but before relying on Photoshop or any software, you need to get the initial image as near correct as possible. Two things here. You are a little over exposed causing detail loss. If necessary, a tiny bit of under exposure helps when shooting. I have all my Canon DSLR's set for minus 1/3 stop as standard - which allows me to correct in software if necessary with detail almost always there.

There is a slight lack of sharpness and the blur on the water from the beak suggests movement of camera - shake. If you were hand holding, 1/250 sec is not fast enough as you were actually at 300mm. It is almost impossible to fully correct camera shake blur fully in software.

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

HelenT4
HelenT4  2 United Kingdom
3 Jun 2012 - 12:45 PM

This is billiant lots of feedback, and some great advise which I am sure will help to improve my photography, thanks to all.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.