hands - Buddy Group 5 - self portrait

Photos > Gallery > hands - Buddy Group 5 - self portrait

Versions (Variants)Version Help

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Upgrade to e2

Tired of clicking to see a large version? Upgrade to e2 to browse all photos automatically at their largest size.

I'm already in one challenge (group 2) but decided to have another go. This one is using a budget ceiling light I bought a few years ago and modified into a ring light. Total cost less than £30.
I placed it on my knee pointing upwards while I took the shot. I started out straight portraits but they looked rubbish so I introduced the hands. I converted to black & white and added a blue fill layer. I like blue!

For those who aren't aware we have a new feature where you team up with six others and complete a challenge. It's highly entertaining and gets you thinking. Join one now.

They can be found in the members meeting area.

Title:hands - Buddy Group 5 - self portrait
Username:Pete Pete
Uploaded:16 Jul 2009 - 1:45 AM
Camera:Nikon D700 Check out Nikon Nation!
Lens:Nikkor 24-120mm Check out Nikon Nation!
Recording media:RAW (digital)
Tags:Portraits / people
Votes:27
Group Event:Critique Buddies July 2009 - 5
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Variant - TestsVariant - Tests

Site Awards

User Awards

No Awards


Comments

NevP
6
851 forum posts Canada13 Constructive Critique Points
16 Jul 2009 - 3:18 AM
0

I like v2 Pete, the straight mono has more impact for me. Nice job.

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
16 Jul 2009 - 8:54 AM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Hoffy
Hoffy (e2 Member)
7
211 forum postsHoffy vcard England14 Constructive Critique Points
16 Jul 2009 - 8:54 AM
0

I like version one, adds more spooky.

tigertimb
16 Jul 2009 - 9:04 AM
0

What happened to the mild mannered guy portrayed in the previous version Tongue
The blue tones, tighter crop and rotation all help over the original and I love the intensity in those eyes.
Great scary stuff, but if this is your normal look when framing possible shots it might explain why there aren't any smiling kids in your portfolio Wink
Tim

ade_mcfade
ade_mcfade (Critique Team)
8
12726 forum postsade_mcfade vcard England212 Constructive Critique Points
16 Jul 2009 - 9:30 AM
0

....jesus, no one's going to give you hassle about the site once they've seen this!

The catch lights in the eyes make them leap out from the rest of the scene - especially on the blue version of the image.

position of the face, just off right, with the hands filling the rest of the scene is spot on - I'd maybe have gone for the middle,. but having seen this, I prefer the off centre look.

so is this the group for people with hand fetishes?

Wink

Pete
Pete (ePHOTOzine Staff)
11
16713 forum postsPete vcard ePz Advertiser England86 Constructive Critique Points
16 Jul 2009 - 9:52 AM
0


Quote: but if this is your normal look when framing

Lol.. no, in light of what Ade and co have been doing, I decided to change from me normal mellow-friendly look as another variation on a self portrait. You should have seen some of the rejects.
Btw this was done in the small home office against the wall. I took this approach to illustrate you don't need expensive kit to do this kind of thing.

tigertimb
16 Jul 2009 - 10:11 AM
0

This raises the one question for me - does a truly great portrait need to do more than just show the image of someone; should it not portray their character too and capture something of the essence of who they are?

And I'm not saying that this doesn't Pete; there's obviously a side of you that likes doing these fun inventive shots; or maybe there's a whole other side of you beneath the mellow-friendly exterior Wink

Tim

ChristineL
16 Jul 2009 - 10:22 AM
0

V2 for me Pete, somehow the mono shadows add to the scariness.
Just needs long fingernails nowSmile
Chris.

Coleslaw
Coleslaw (e2 Member)
6
12761 forum postsColeslaw vcard Wales27 Constructive Critique Points
16 Jul 2009 - 12:50 PM
0

Again, I have no idea how you focus on the eyes....Sad
The highlights on the eyes make it for me as well.

riprap007
16 Jul 2009 - 3:09 PM
0

the budget lighting set up emulates a ring flash well (and is far cheaper!), having done a few of these myself I'm aware of how tricky they can be, I have however posted a mod with a suggested crop, just to help add some further emphasis to hand spread and eyes

Angi_Nelson
Angi_Nelson (e2 Member)
4
168 forum postsAngi_Nelson vcard United Kingdom10 Constructive Critique Points
16 Jul 2009 - 4:30 PM
0

Great idea, Ive joined this group and will post my contribution up over the next few days. Not sure where to start and portraits are not my forte , so I suppose its good to practice.
I like the processing you have done on this one and the darkness to it. The only thing I cvan see that I would change is the positioning of the hand on the left, but thats probably just me.

Looks good to me Pete.....Smile)

Maybe I shot you one day in my studio....lol

Carsten

croberts
16 Jul 2009 - 5:32 PM
0

i prefer the original unedited shot. It has a more honest feel to it, and a more vulnerable kind of vibe. A bit more "don't hurt me" rather than "come any closer and i'll hurt you"

i like it.

beckas
8
United States1 Constructive Critique Points
16 Jul 2009 - 5:50 PM
0

V1 is my fave. I love the feeling that it portrays, it makes it kind of spooky. I know that with SP's, it's sometimes difficult to get the correct focus point and it's spot on in this photo. Well done!

I have a hard time critiquing which is why I usually don't. To me, this photo is perfect as is. If I had to change one thing about it, I guess I would crop a slight bit off the top of the photo but I am not sure that it would improve it.

martin.w
martin.w (e2 Member)
10
298 forum postsmartin.w vcard United Kingdom10 Constructive Critique Points
16 Jul 2009 - 8:37 PM
0

I prefer this one, proving to me at least that the simple approach works best. V1 for me, the blue tint just seems more effective Smile

Got to go with V2 here as to me, that one is the spookiest.
If that's what you were aiming for, you have got it right...
Hilary

Diana
Diana (e2 Member)
5
2011 forum postsDiana vcard Netherlands19 Constructive Critique Points
16 Jul 2009 - 8:58 PM
0

the home made ring flash is superb

please share how you done this in more detail...

sorry I made you look more scarey....just messing Smile

Diana

javam
javam (e2 Member)
7
918 forum postsjavam vcard United Kingdom17 Constructive Critique Points
16 Jul 2009 - 10:33 PM
0

Nothing wrong with V1&2 but I think V3 is the best of the bunch. Your eyes stand out even more and I really like the tone of the background, sets the skin tones off well.

Unrelated question, are you trying out the Nikon or have you jumped ship?

Neil

Goggz
Goggz (e2 Member)
5
2246 forum postsGoggz vcard Nepal65 Constructive Critique Points
21 Jul 2009 - 12:42 AM
0

You aren't tanning yourself evenly Pete Wink

I like the slightly sinister V1. I'm a blue fan too...

CHeers, GOggz

Mari
Mari (e2 Member)
8
1821 forum postsMari vcard Wales
21 Jul 2009 - 6:32 PM
0

I like V3 best as a composition Pete, its more dynamic, but think with the colouring on V1

Paul Morgan
Paul Morgan (Challenge Team)
11
8615 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England5 Constructive Critique Points
28 Jul 2009 - 11:42 PM
0

Its V3 for me, have you no pics of padded cells from your asylum trip, would make a great background.

rowarrior
1 Aug 2009 - 1:22 AM
0

I like all 3, hard to choose which, but what is it with the men and big hand obsession in this group?!

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.