Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Harewood House

Versions (Before and After)Version Help

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

55% OFF new PortraitPro 12 - use code EPHZROS414.
Add Comment

After a family day out in the grounds of Harewood House I managed to grab 10 minutes before going home to capture the house. Not the best conditions with the sun still quite high in the sky but I probably won't get back there for a while. Deciding how much of the flower beds to include was my composition dilemma here.
Phil

Brand:NIKON CORPORATION
Camera:Nikon D90 Check out Nikon Nation!
Lens:10.0-20.0 mm f/4.0-5.6
Recording media:RAW (digital)
Date Taken:26 May 2012 - 2:46 PM
Focal Length:11.5mm
Lens Max Aperture:f/4.3
Aperture:f/16.0
Shutter Speed:1/100sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:200
Exposure Mode:Manual
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:No Flash
Title:Harewood House
Username:Philo Philo
Uploaded:31 Jul 2012 - 5:05 PM
Tags:Architecture, Flower beds, Gardens, Landscape / travel, Leeds, Stately home
VS Mode Rating 102 (75% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Modifications wanted Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Variant - Before/AfterVariant - Before and After
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
iancatch
iancatch e2 Member 7iancatch vcard England45 Constructive Critique Points
31 Jul 2012 - 10:21 PM

Love the perspective generated by the ballistrade and angle at which you have captured the house. In terms of composition I think you have done the best you can as if you are like me you always seem to have to cut some off. works very well and like it very much. Great shot in difficult light conditions.

Ian

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Jestertheclown
31 Jul 2012 - 11:09 PM

Hi Phil,
I like this. In lots of ways it has a lot going for it but I keep looking at the distortion.
It seems to go beyond being just perspective and foreshortening. Is it caused by that lens or have you adjusted the verticals?
Bren.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Philo
Philo e2 Member 352 forum postsPhilo vcard England83 Constructive Critique Points
1 Aug 2012 - 6:35 AM

Thanks Ian and Bren, appreciate the feedback. Yes Bren, the verticals have been corrected and I can't honestly decide which I prefer. My V1 looks as if I have over corrected but I am sure they are plumb. V2 uploaded for comparison with verticals left as shot. I do try to get them right in camera but I just couldn't achieve my desired composition.
The correction of verticals debate goes on and I am pretty certain I know which version you will prefer, Bren.Wink
Cheers,
Phil

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Focus_Man
Focus_Man  4481 forum posts United Kingdom631 Constructive Critique Points
1 Aug 2012 - 8:43 AMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Both are fine Phil, (This seems to be one of your favourite architectural sites) the distortion in V2 is not excessive and the corrected verticals in V1 makes the building appear to be more majestic. there is an inbetween route of course where you could in V2 make teh RH end the same as the LH end with a tweak of "Distort".

As for the gardens, I feel you have the right balance here with 2/3 sky. Very nice pic Phil.

Frank

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Jestertheclown
1 Aug 2012 - 11:35 AMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

V2 without a doubt Phil.
The corrected version is, by comparison, completely unnatural and a good example of how 'correcting' verticals doesn't work with shots taken from an angle across the subject.
The verticals in V1 probably are plumb but the towers at each end appear to flare outwards towards their tops and the centre of the building is falling forwards.
It may be that the lens correction tool, which tends to be more subtle would work here, or another alternative might be to use the marquis tool to isolate just the individual towers and modify them on their own.
Or you could just leave it, which is what I would do!
Bren.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

NEWMANP
NEWMANP e2 Member 61581 forum postsNEWMANP vcard United Kingdom572 Constructive Critique Points
1 Aug 2012 - 4:19 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

its a nice record of the house and garden and its all well polished and exposed as it should be. nice and sharp and good colour.

its not a large house, ive been, but i think the 11mm focal length is acting against you despite the obvious requirement to pull in the foreground. its making the perspective a bit too exagerated. i do like the viewpoint though, so much more dynamic than head on to a structure.

i think the lens distortion correction was worth doing but it looks a bit large at the front for such a short length of building. i think a 24 mm focal length or something but a bit further back may have been easier on the eye.

otherwise cant fault it, just find the perspective a bit exsessive for the size of the building. that effect looks much better on modern structures.

Phil

Last Modified By NEWMANP at 1 Aug 2012 - 4:20 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Philo
Philo e2 Member 352 forum postsPhilo vcard England83 Constructive Critique Points
1 Aug 2012 - 4:39 PM

Thanks Frank, I like the idea of partially correcting the verticals. Bren, I think you may prefer that too, certainly over the original.
Thanks Phil for the insight into perspective, I can now see how this technique lends itself more to modern architecture. I only had the 10 -20mm but I wish I would have tried a few shots at the longer end for comparison. Maybe next timeGrin
Phil

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.