Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Lowry Fireworks

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

This is a montage of two shots, one of the Lowry theatre in Salford Quays and one from a fireworks display elsewhere. The key thing to remember was to create reflections of the fireworks in the water.

Camera:Sony A700
Lens:Sigma 10-20
Recording media:RAW (digital)
Title:Lowry Fireworks
Username:AntHolloway AntHolloway
Uploaded:1 May 2012 - 7:46 AM
Tags:Digitally manipulated, Fireworks, Landscape / travel, Montage, Salford quays
VS Mode Rating 104 (100% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:34

Comments

Hoverflylover

I think you have done exceptionally well to create this image. The blending of the two images is superb. I've got a thing about straight horizons and lines and my only critique is that the Sigma 10-20 has created quite a bit of disortion on the buildings. I wonder if you might have another straighter buildings image that you could blend again as I think this would be even greater. Very nice in any event.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

ugly
ugly e2 Member 6ugly vcard United Kingdom55 Constructive Critique Points
1 May 2012 - 8:06 AM

I like the image...
There a lot to learn from this image...
See above at Hoverflylover.
A great try do not give up...


Dave

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

NDODS
NDODS e2 Member 43282 forum postsNDODS vcard United Kingdom103 Constructive Critique Points
1 May 2012 - 8:13 AM

A great image, supported by two great comments above.

Regards Nathan

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Briwooly
Briwooly  8452 forum posts England5 Constructive Critique Points
1 May 2012 - 8:20 AM

Great work

Brian............................................

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

danmclean
danmclean  8 Australia1 Constructive Critique Points
1 May 2012 - 9:00 AM

First class shot this,,,
Dan

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

DalesLass
DalesLass e2 Member 32070 forum postsDalesLass vcard United Kingdom
1 May 2012 - 11:53 AM

Fabulous image, really well captured!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

gajewski
gajewski e2 Member 10gajewski vcard United States9 Constructive Critique Points
1 May 2012 - 5:06 PM

Very skillfully done. I'm glad you included your commentary because your image fooled me into thinking this actually took place. Nice work.
-=\Walter

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

DRicherby
DRicherby  5269 forum posts United Kingdom725 Constructive Critique Points
5 May 2012 - 10:16 AMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

At first sight, this looks really good. You've merged the images very well and, as you say, the reflections are key. But it's still pretty obvious that you've merged two separate images because the background was clearly taken with a very long exposure (perhaps even several minutes), whereas the fireworks were taken with a relatively fast shutter (at most a few seconds).

Whether this is a problem depends entirely on your intended audience. If you're aiming it at pedantic photographers, that kind of thing will get spotted. If you're aiming it at the general public, it probably won't. On the other hand, a general audience might find the shot a little confusing, without being able to pin down the technical reason. The blurred clouds in the sky give a slow-paced, quet, relaxed feel but the fireworks are bright and fast and loud -- so maybe they don't quite belong in the same photo?

Dave.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

AntHolloway
AntHolloway e2 Member 9168 forum postsAntHolloway vcard United Kingdom
6 May 2012 - 11:24 AM

Hi Dave,

You make a good point although in fact there is not quite as big a difference in exposure times. The HDR image of the Lowry was from three shots of duration 1.6s, 6s and 25s - it was a very windy evening and so the clouds moved a great deal in that time. The fireworks image was a 5s exposure.

The image was one I was creating for a creative section of one of the British Photographic Exhibition competitions, where you image is viewed and scored within about 5 seconds, so impact is the main factor. Fingers crossed they think it has that.

Cheers,
Ant.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.