Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Lufthansa Take-Off

Versions (Variants)Version Help

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

An Airbus 340-600 taking off after maintenance work at Lufthansa Technik Malta (LTM).

Shot using a Canon EOS 600D, EF-S 55-250 lens at 70mm, 1/320 sec, ISO 200 and an aperture of f/16, (Spot metering).

Camera:Canon EOS 600D
Lens:EF-S55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS
Recording media:RAW (digital)
Title:Lufthansa Take-Off
Username:alistairfarrugia alistairfarrugia
Uploaded:24 Apr 2013 - 1:44 PM
Tags:340-600, Airbus, Lufthansa, Malta, Plane, Spotting, Take off, Transport
VS Mode Rating 101 (57.14% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:10
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Variant - TestsVariant - Tests

Comments

NDODS
NDODS e2 Member 43684 forum postsNDODS vcard United Kingdom107 Constructive Critique Points
24 Apr 2013 - 1:57 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

An aviation enthusiasts dream Alistair. Beautifully sharp and so very well captured. My only point would be to allow a little more space to the right of the aeroplane in which to move into, it does look rather crammed...

Regards Nathan GrinGrinGrin

Last Modified By NDODS at 24 Apr 2013 - 1:57 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum postsalistairfarrugia vcard Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
24 Apr 2013 - 2:02 PM

I'll check my other images of this beast and try find one that has more space on the RHS.

I was aware of this issue before selecting an image to upload. The difficulty with this variant is that it's a huge airplane, one of the longest commercial aircraft in operation apparently, and allowing space on the right means making the plane look more "normal size" as it would occupy less space in the final image. Presented in this manner, I think it exaggerates the scale of the airplane and its massive length. Regardless, I will still look into finding a better variant that gives some space on the RHS.

I obviously agree with the suggestion as it applies to all moving subjects I believe. Smile Thanks for the feedback!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

doolittle
doolittle e2 Member 5doolittle vcard South Africa2 Constructive Critique Points
24 Apr 2013 - 2:37 PM

Re the comments above - I'd like to suggest cropping the wing on the left a bit. I've tried it with a few of my shots and I find it works fine.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum postsalistairfarrugia vcard Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
24 Apr 2013 - 2:40 PM

I would typically hesitate doing such cropping doolittle, but I'll look into it. I'm editing pics from this shoot as we speak, so will look into it shortly. Thanks for the comment and the vote, I appreciate.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

ColleenA
ColleenA e2 Member 2204 forum postsColleenA vcard Australia3 Constructive Critique Points
24 Apr 2013 - 4:43 PM


Quote: An aviation enthusiasts dream Alistair. Beautifully sharp and so very well captured. My only point would be to allow a little more space to the right of the aeroplane in which to move into, it does look rather crammed...

Regards Nathan GrinGrinGrin

Nice image but agree with Nathan

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10988 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2985 Constructive Critique Points
24 Apr 2013 - 5:43 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Good shot. The heavy black border contributes to that closed in impression, - I would advise not to use them. Spot metering has given, as it so often does, a slightly underexposed shot, and white balance is biased towards blue. Im know Malta is sunny!

A little in front doesnt hurt, and it makes it a perfect panorama proportion, twice as wide as high. But you need to crop tighter first to get rid of the building, then extend the canvas without the building.

Good panning, assuming its panned, as this was moving more than 160Km/h at this point. The sharpness drops off a little at the left, due to the angle youre camera is at, so a little sharpening, with less on the right than the left helps.

Pity the name Lufthansa will always be remembered as the airline that caused the worst crash in aviation history, in Tenerife. Lots of changes came as a result of that, mainly on in-cabin chain of command.


Mod loaded.


Good work,


Willie

Last Modified By banehawi at 24 Apr 2013 - 5:47 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum postsalistairfarrugia vcard Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
24 Apr 2013 - 5:51 PM

Thanks Willie, I will try modify the original and make sure I end up with a better product taking into account all the positive feedback received. Thanks!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum postsalistairfarrugia vcard Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
24 Apr 2013 - 6:02 PM

Variant 2 uploaded:
Exposure arranged, incl. White Balance issues, I hope. Cloned out building on the RHS to retain just trees, and added that space in front. Originally, this was shot with space on the right, it was a conscious choice to crop tight with this one. Seems it wasn't a wise one. Will upload the original as a third variant as well.

Cropped to 2:1 ratio here, following Willie's suggestion.

Variant 3: SOOC shot, no adjustments, just converted to JPG, resized and sharpened for web.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10988 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2985 Constructive Critique Points
24 Apr 2013 - 8:15 PM

V2 looks good, though WB of V3 is better


W

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum postsalistairfarrugia vcard Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
24 Apr 2013 - 8:38 PM

Thanks. Then it seems that the WB I had originally was fine then as V3 is as-shot. I think I was on Daylight WB setting.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.