I'm really interested to hear your opinions on this. When I got home and viewed this on the monitor, I immediately thought: nice, but I should have changed aperture setting. I still like the shot, but if I had changed the aperture of 4.0 to, say, 22, it might have been better. What do you think?
This was shot at Batenburg (The Netherlands). I had gone out when it was still light to shoot this windmill. I stayed longer than I thought, and therefore got into this situation where I should have had a tripod with me but didn't. :-(
I used fill-in flash to solve part of the problem, but of course that way I lit something that's not in focus.
So, whats the verdict? Is this all wrong because of the shallow dof and the focus on the windmill, or do you think the shot still has merit?
Any suggestions and mods welcome!
|Camera:||Canon EOS 20D |
|Lens:||Canon EF 24 mm |