Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Rear

Versions (Before and After)Version Help

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Exciting Updates to Free & Paid Memberships! Read More
Add Comment

Just trying something................

Camera:Nikon D70 Check out Nikon Nation!
Recording media:RAW (digital)
Title:Rear
Username:kaybee kaybee
Uploaded:1 May 2010 - 4:02 PM
Tags:General
VS Mode Rating Unrated
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to Plus

Become a plus member to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:19
Voters:SJV_ART · phil99 · PauloNascimentoPhotography · miptog · tony64 · W1ldside · John_Horner · Dave_Collier · canon_stu · G3 · alant2 · woolybill1 · cats_123 · Cor · User_Removed · RavenTepes · walterec · DRicherby · xanda ·
Views:208
Unique Views:140
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Variant - Before/AfterVariant - Before and After

Comments

PauloNascimentoPhotography
1 May 2010 - 4:14 PM

Very creative, well done!
Paulo

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

miptog
miptog Plus Member 93532 forum postsmiptog vcard United Kingdom61 Constructive Critique Points
1 May 2010 - 4:16 PM

Ditto

Just get the hands out of frame next time Smile

Last Modified By miptog at 1 May 2010 - 4:17 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

W1ldside
W1ldside Plus Member 4W1ldside vcard United Kingdom29 Constructive Critique Points
1 May 2010 - 4:29 PM

Disagree ~ the hands give the shot balance and poise and therefore a different approach ~ Keep trying all those things that break the rules ~ Thats what sets us apart from the Norm....
Well done

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

kaybee
kaybee Plus Member 103992 forum postskaybee vcard Scotland25 Constructive Critique Points
1 May 2010 - 4:46 PM

Thanks for he comments and the modification folks.

Michael ..... out of curiousity - why 'no hands'?

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

canon_stu
canon_stu Plus Member 11140 forum postscanon_stu vcard England4 Constructive Critique Points
1 May 2010 - 5:05 PM

I prefer the image with hands,

Stu

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

miptog
miptog Plus Member 93532 forum postsmiptog vcard United Kingdom61 Constructive Critique Points
1 May 2010 - 5:20 PM


Quote: Michael ..... out of curiousity - why 'no hands'?

The bottom is the main focus point, the hands were not doing anything , so were distracting. Just my view.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Cor
Cor Plus Member 5Cor vcard Belgium
2 May 2010 - 9:03 AM

V2 for me +++++
cor

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

RavenTepes
3 May 2010 - 1:11 PM

I agree...while granted, the rear is the main focus point, the hands do give the shot a level of balance and fluidity. I personally prefer the original, compared to the edit.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

kaybee
kaybee Plus Member 103992 forum postskaybee vcard Scotland25 Constructive Critique Points
3 May 2010 - 5:46 PM

Thank you all.

Glad it isn't just me that prefers with the hands

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

walterec
walterec Plus Member 11walterec vcard
4 May 2010 - 5:02 PM

Hands in please; it is a bit too contrived without the hands

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

DRicherby
DRicherby Plus Member 6269 forum postsDRicherby vcard United Kingdom725 Constructive Critique Points
8 May 2010 - 10:06 PM

Hmm. I prefer it without the hands but I can't coherently explain why. The image seems somehow a bit too `wide' with them in. Or perhaps keep the hands in and leave a bit more empty space to the left and right?

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

kaybee
kaybee Plus Member 103992 forum postskaybee vcard Scotland25 Constructive Critique Points
9 May 2010 - 7:46 PM

Sorry? - you are going to have to think coherently and explain that to me.

How can it be too wide wih the hands but you would rather have more room at the sides? - that would make it even wider.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

DRicherby
DRicherby Plus Member 6269 forum postsDRicherby vcard United Kingdom725 Constructive Critique Points
9 May 2010 - 8:29 PM

Adding space at the sides would make the image as a whole wider but it would mean that the subject wouldn't fill the whole of that width. Something that fills a very wide frame looks, itself, to be very wide; something that doesn't quite fill an even wider frame doesn't necessarily look quite so wide.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.