Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Snowy Egret in Mallorca

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

PRIZES GALORE! Enter The ePHOTOzine Exclusive Christmas Prize Draw; Over £10,000 Worth of Prizes! Plus A Gift For Everybody On Christmas Day!
Add Comment

Hi....I'm looking for critique on this shot....no work has been done on this image.

Please note the settings and tell me what you would use.

Aperture mode 5.6
ISO 200
EXP -1.3
F length 300 mm
1/1600 sec

I cannaot recall whether I used VR but I think not.

All help appreciated....thanks

Brand:Nikon CORPORATION
Camera:Nikon D7000 Check out Nikon Nation!
Lens:Nikon 28-300 VR
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:24 May 2011 - 1:01 PM
Focal Length:300mm
Lens Max Aperture:f/5.7
Aperture:f/5.6
Shutter Speed:1/1600sec
Exposure Comp:-4/3
ISO:200, 200
Exposure Mode:Aperture-priority AE
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:Off, Did not fire
Title:Snowy Egret in Mallorca
Username:MikeRC MikeRC
Uploaded:18 Jun 2011 - 9:13 AM
Tags:Pets / captive animals, Wildlife / nature
VS Mode Rating 102 (66.67% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Modifications wanted Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
daverton
daverton  3
18 Jun 2011 - 9:56 AM

Great shot! Taken on the right moment!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulknight
18 Jun 2011 - 10:28 AM

Great lines! Well captured!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

CarolG
CarolG e2 Member 8146 forum postsCarolG vcard Greece18 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jun 2011 - 10:55 AM

Perfect timing, Mike. Carol

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

G6DDS
G6DDS  5231 forum posts Scotland
18 Jun 2011 - 11:54 AM

Not really my area but from what i've read on here your settings are correct. Have the aperture wide open to get the faster shutter speed for freezing movement.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Overread
Overread  63915 forum posts England18 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jun 2011 - 12:04 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Technically speaking I can't see anything wrong with this photo at all, at this scale on the web. You've even used the -2/3rds exposure compensation to help counter the brighter parts of the white bird from overexposing (the whites along the back look strong white, but I don't think they've overexposed - histogram on your computer should be able to give you a more definitive answer, but they don't stand out to me at all).
ISO is where I'd start for wildlife - 200 is a good base to work from; though on dimmer days 400 is normally very usable on pretty much all cameras without worries. Shutter speed is certainly fast enough to freeze the motion (and has done wonderfully) and is also more than fast enough that any handshake should be of no concern (at 1/1600 at 300mm VR, strictly speaking, won't be having any effect on the hand motion blur in the shot).
Aperture - well you've been reading and chatting in the forums about the aperture and sharpness, esp with regard to the 28-300mm so I'll take it as given that you already know to try shifting to a slightly smaller aperture to get a little more sharpness out of the setup.

Having done no editing work at all its a good result - myself I'd say sharpening (esp after resizing) would be needed on the photo, but other than that no areas appear in need of work. Some burning around the whites might be in order if they are just blown - though if you shoot RAW I'd be tempted to process the RAW twice - once normally and once for the highlights (same settings as for normal, but then slide the exposure slider until the whites are more controlled; but not too far that they look "dark") and then blend the two images into one with layermasks in editing.

However I get the feeling that the result you've gotten has left you feeling like something might be wrong, that something is lacking that you'd prefer different. If you have some examples taken by others that you'd like to emulate if you could link to them it might help to understand where you want to head - what you'd like to be able to create with the camera.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

csurry
csurry  129230 forum posts92 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jun 2011 - 12:20 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Hi Mike, whether the image works or not is down to does it represent what you wanted to capture?

For me personally I would go for a slower shutter speed, but that is because I like some movement in the wings if possible on a shot. Why? Well for me I never like my images to look like I could cut and paste the bird on to another background. Blurring the wings for me appears to "anchor" the bird in to the image. I suppose it is comparable to taking pictures of prop driven planes and showing the props as completely static. The dynamic aspect of the image is lost. Or motorsport images where the wheels and spokes are completely frozen.

Of course the slower the shutter speed the harder the shot as you will need to match your panning of the bird to the effect that you are striving for.

That said, of course, the initial aim has to be a sharp shot. From there your technique can be adapted to achieve different results such as the wing blur.

HTH
Cheryl

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

ams99
ams99 Junior Member 365 forum posts England9 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jun 2011 - 12:52 PM

Wonderful shot. It really stands out.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

CathR
CathR  7139 forum posts United Kingdom563 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jun 2011 - 1:05 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

It's a nice shot Mike - I like the green feet and shiny black legs Smile

Your settings look fine. I might have been tempted to start off with a bit of a smaller aperture, say 6.3 or 7.1, as you have some latitude with the shutter speed and you could afford to lose a little from your 1/1600 and still freeze the action. However it does not look to me that you have a depth of field problem, so maybe it doesn't matter too much.

I do think you are getting dangerously close to burn out in areas behind the head and on the left wing. the histogram shows a very narrow line going right to the edge of the display and sampling with the eyedropper on the "information" palette reveals 255 in places in both the blue and green channels. I would absolutely no question use raw for this type of shot as white birds are a nightmare to get the exposure spot on. You can then do as overread suggests and adjust the exposure in the raw converter. I suspect your main problem is that the light in Majorca is on the harsh side which contributes to the burn out and shadows. Softer light in the early morning and late afternoon is much easier to control.

Best wishes

Catherine

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

MikeRC
MikeRC e2 Member 93509 forum postsMikeRC vcard United Kingdom
18 Jun 2011 - 2:54 PM

Thanks everyone...I appreciate the critique, I wasn't really unhappy with the shot but I'm constantly afraid that I am continually doing it wrong and/or, could do better Smile

I didn't want to carry on the way I was if it was wrong and I'm a lot happier knowing I'm somewhere near, I think that I have begun to understand the settings more recently and I think this critique and the recent aperture thread have helped a great deal.....I'm 'gonna close the aperture a tad and see how that goes.

....many thanks "Overread" ""Cheryl" and "Catherine"....much appreciated.

.....Mike

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Overread
Overread  63915 forum posts England18 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jun 2011 - 3:13 PM

Just to add, but improvements can also be had at the editing stage as well. You might find the articles on the following sites to be of help:

http://www.juzaphoto.com/index2.php?l=en&pg=articoli
http://www.ronbigelow.com/articles/articles.htm

I'd recommend checking out the articles on sharpening, noise reduction, curves, layers, levels and histograms for a good starting point.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10986 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2982 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jun 2011 - 4:08 PM

Excellent shot anyone would be proud of. Very good balance between brights and shadows, wisely accomplished by exposure compensation. A load of great tips, - all of which will take your skill to the next level, but to find any fault with this would be difficult.


regards


W

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Niknut
Niknut e2 Member 4734 forum postsNiknut vcard United Kingdom64 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jun 2011 - 4:41 PM

Faultless shot !.....be proud of it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

pluckyfilly
pluckyfilly e2 Member 8317 forum postspluckyfilly vcard United Kingdom33 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jun 2011 - 5:16 PM

Lets say I would be pleased to get this shot, in the first place hes not stationary and that makes getting the picture more difficult but I know what you mean by moving up 1 grade I am in the middle as well - no longer a beginner and wanting to improve to the next stage. Your being very self critical Mike, I guess thats not a bad thing and we all do it, me includedWink You have some good feedback here but honestly I would not worry overly much you have more than a half decent shotSmile

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Samuel_Aron
18 Jun 2011 - 7:14 PM

Fantastic timing and a ggreat capture!
Sam.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Andy_Cundell
18 Jun 2011 - 9:16 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Great photo but I have to agree with csurry on the shutter speed.

To 'believe' the bird is flying and landing on water, you need a slight movement of the wings or what would of been really good, would be water from the birds feet spraying up as it lands. The viewer 'needs' to see some movement or they could think it's just hanging in mid air.

As for the colour, I think it's pretty spot on. We all know a bird would never be really 'white' and I love the green tinge to its feet.

The focus is also spot on, people always tell me you need the eyes in focus and you have done exactly that!

Nice job

Andy

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Jestertheclown
18 Jun 2011 - 9:21 PM

I don't think I can add anything at all to all of that!

An excellent shot.

Bren.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

NEWMANP
NEWMANP e2 Member 61587 forum postsNEWMANP vcard United Kingdom574 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jun 2011 - 9:51 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

hi,
nice image all around, nice and sharp and particularly well exposed without losing any detail in the white and yet retaining a nice balance in the background tones.

the eyes are sharp and have the obligatory highlight and there is room to move into in front.

settings wise i sort of agree that a little blur either panning the background or in the wings from a static shot may have given a little more life to the image. similarly its a shame there isnt a reflection in the water to give that extra element that makes a good shot great.

its a luxury to have 200 ISO at those speeds, usually im around 500 iso with any kind of flight shot. similarly im surprised there isnt a little flap even at 1/1600sec. you mention the VR but to honest it works against you above 1/500sec and may even cause you problems. its unlikey to kick in during a short exposure anyhow.

Its a nice shot, and its damn hard to give really useful critique where the work is pretty good and there is no direct area of assistance been requested.

best regards
Phil

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

LeeFisher
LeeFisher e2 Member 559 forum postsLeeFisher vcard England8 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jun 2011 - 12:39 AMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Hi Mike,
In essence what you've achieved here is a good shot, I like the birds pose and the position of the feet.
For me the image is anchored fine and I personally would have pushed the ISO a little further to gain even more shutter speed to assist with obtaining a razor sharp shot. (though 1-1600th should be more than enough for a landing egret)

In my opinion the things that slightly hold it back are the lighting and the sharpness of the image.
The image lacks that critical razor sharpness that would lift it to the next level, this could possibly be achieved at the processing level as the image already looks pretty crisp or possibly in the panning technique.
The second thing for me, and the thing that is most important is the lighting, It's simply too harsh for the bird. In my opinion there is nothing you can do about this as a harsh contrasty light will always look unflattering in an image. This is particularly emphasised on a white bird. If this same image had been taken in the hour before sunset or after sunrise then the image would be transformed to a whole new level. This for me is the fundemental key to all good shots, but I appreciate that you shoot in the light that has been given to you Smile
Hope this has been of some help mate,
Cheers Lee

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Ray42
Ray42  6 England3 Constructive Critique Points
19 Jun 2011 - 8:10 AM

An excellent shot - well timed and sitting nicely in the frame - very little work to be done in PS and some great tips from the experts above to help you to the next level - good on you

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  789 forum posts United Kingdom880 Constructive Critique Points
20 Jun 2011 - 5:28 PM

First class. I assume the full size image is as sharp as this looks and am amazed if you havn't just done a touch of sharpening - even the best gear usually needs a bit of unsharp mask.

Nothing to crit for me - great stuff. Lots of comments again on a brilliant shot - lets have a few more on the less than brilliant shots!

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.