Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

The Ruins at Wothorpe

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

The Ruins at Wothorpe. The lands around the town on Stamford were and still are owned by the Lord of Burghley. the Wothorpe Lodge house was used each year to be the home of the Lord and his family while the main house, Burghley House was swept and cleaned. The dust created and the general mess made living in the main house impossible during the clean up.


Photographers note: if the verticals are a bit out it is because they are out on the ruins!

Brand:Sony
Camera:Sony NEX-5
Lens:E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:14 Jun 2013 - 7:10 PM
Focal Length:93mm
Lens Max Aperture:f/5.6
Aperture:f/18.0
Shutter Speed:1/10sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:200
Exposure Mode:Aperture-priority AE
Metering Mode:Center-weighted average
Flash:Off, Did not fire
White Balance:Auto
Title:The Ruins at Wothorpe
Username:charisma515 charisma515
Uploaded:13 Jul 2013 - 7:27 PM
Tags:Architecture, Buildings, Old, Ruins
VS Mode Rating 100 (50% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10781 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2803 Constructive Critique Points
13 Jul 2013 - 9:22 PM

It does look wonky, and Ive restrained from straightening it. I did measure verticals, and it appears the old "cottage" is not faring well.

Its a shot that could look nicer with a blue sky, but you had to work with what was there. The exposure is ok, though the building itself seems to lack contrast, and is a little flat (no pun). I like the distant church included.


At 1/10 second, if this is hand-held, its a near miracle theres not movement blur.


My only suggestion is some contrast work, and Ive uploaded a mod to show what I mean.


Regards


Willie

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  681 forum posts United Kingdom843 Constructive Critique Points
14 Jul 2013 - 9:10 AM

A decent record. Conditions against you giving a slightly flat image but that is what contrast adjustment is about. Boost the contrast a touch. Unfortunately that will make the sky even lighter. Sharp enough, so you must have used some support at such a low shutter speed?

Don't use a white border in such cases. A thin black border would look much better, holding that sky in.

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

charisma515
14 Jul 2013 - 9:34 AM

Willie thank you, I had tried to photograph this building before so I knew I would need a tripod which for this shot I had about my person! I agree more contrast would have helped to make a better shot. I suppose if the verticals had been true the building would not have fallen down any way! Fred

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

charisma515
14 Jul 2013 - 9:37 AM

Paul thanks for tip over the black preferred border and the comments about contrast with which I agree. Thakns for the time you have spent with your helpful comments.

Fred

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Anacithidus
14 Jul 2013 - 10:28 AM

I wouldn't change a thing personally, it's a great pic. I keep meaning to have a walk up there myself but I still haven't done so

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

mrswoolybill
mrswoolybill Critique Team 7395 forum postsmrswoolybill vcard United Kingdom971 Constructive Critique Points
14 Jul 2013 - 12:08 PM

Apart from the doubt over the verticals, it's a neat, factual image. It records the appearance of the building.
You know how to get a sharp, well exposed file; next step - look for pictures. On your next visit, try standing a little further away, placing the building off centre. Look for a fence or wall to lead into the frame diagonally, look to balance the building with maybe some trees on one side - all the clichés that actually make an interesting image, one that draws the eye in and invites it to explore.
Moira

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

charisma515
14 Jul 2013 - 12:51 PM

Moira I would have liked more flexibility over the position but its private land and you have to stick to the path which is planted with high hedges on each side with only the occasional gaps. As always thanks Fred

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.