Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Wall Near Chapel Stile

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

Canon EOS 5D Mark II with Canon EOS 50mm L f1.2 USM.
I was exploring the potential of the f1.2 for narrow depth of field and bokeh effect.
ISO 50, 1/1250

Brand:Canon
Camera:Canon EOS 5D MkII
Lens:Canon EOS 50mm f/1.2
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:12 Sep 2012 - 4:14 PM
Focal Length:50mm
Aperture:f/1.2
Shutter Speed:1/1250sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:50
Exposure Mode:Manual
Metering Mode:Spot
Flash:Off, Did not fire
White Balance:Auto
Title:Wall Near Chapel Stile
Username:thyme46 thyme46
Uploaded:26 Sep 2012 - 9:08 AM
Tags:Close-up / macro, Landscape / travel, Specialist / abstract, Wildlife / nature
VS Mode Rating 97 (31.25% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum posts Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
26 Sep 2012 - 12:38 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

I think this picture lacks a wow-factor, and the big white blot in the top-left hand side (which I believe is an over-exposed sky, right) doesn't help the image at all. You could have probably ended up with a more interesting photo had you zoomed in further on the match-stick like flowers/growths that show in the centre-portion of the picture. Soemtimes, as I've seen mentioned already many times before on this site, less is more.

The overexposed area might have happened due to the use of spot-metering on a very dark part of the picture - did you lock metering manually on a spot? At that shutter speed, even at maximum aperture of 1.2, I don't know whether the sky should have retained some more detail, so it's probably a metering issue. Might be wrong as I'm not a pro in this area and in photography in general - just making a guess based on what I know about shutter speeds, aperture etc. Hope you get additional feedback.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10867 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2865 Constructive Critique Points
26 Sep 2012 - 5:37 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Welcome to Ephotozine William.


Thats quite a lens. The sharpness and bokeh are excellent. The subject and the conditions though were not ideal. I dont know what you used for the spot metering, but the main part of the image is under exposed, and the large bright area a distraction. The visible bokeh is gorgeous, but would be better across the frame.

Also, - you may not be aware, when you re size for the web, open the resized image and check sharpness, - you may have to apply some additional sharpening. Try the lens out on street scenes, outdoor portraits and see what it can do.


I have uploaded a mod where Ive roughly filled in the bright area with existing bokeh to show what I mean, and Ive adjusted exposure and sharpness.



regards



Willie

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  781 forum posts United Kingdom851 Constructive Critique Points
27 Sep 2012 - 5:26 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

May be anexperiment, but I fear the end product is not very strong. You needed a much more frame filling image of the moss, then some back light to make the filaments stand out. At this size, theres just not enough sharp.

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.