Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

WINDSOR BUTTERFLY

Gallery > WINDSOR BUTTERFLY

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

No macro equipment thus once back at my flat conversion from the RAW captured cropped to 600 x 400 pixels for upload to this GALLERY and then auto sharpen and then saved as JPEG.

Brand:PENTAX Corporation
Camera:Pentax *ist DL2
Lens:smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL
Recording media:RAW (digital)
Date Taken:25 Apr 2012 - 12:57 PM
Focal Length:55mm
Aperture:f/8.0
Shutter Speed:1/320sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:200
Exposure Mode:Landscape
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:Off, Did not fire
Title:WINDSOR BUTTERFLY
Username:TimothyDMorton TimothyDMorton
Uploaded:26 Apr 2012 - 12:48 AM
Tags:Close-up / macro, Wildlife / nature
VS Mode Rating Unrated
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

Davesumner
Davesumner (e2 Member)
6
28 forum postsDavesumner vcard Australia300 Constructive Critique Points
26 Apr 2012 - 5:36 AM
0

Hi Timothy,

Great effort with the butterfly, i think you've done well not to blow out any of the rock etc. considering the bright light. The butterfly seems sharp and the depth of field is also good although I think your viewpoint is a little overhead and to the side. I realise that it isn't easy getting shots of butterflies, they all seem to fly off at the slightest movement especially the photogenic ones. When it comes to insects and the smaller things that we photograph, I think closer is better and also the angle we shoot them at goes a long way to creating a succesful shot. In this case I think that once you have captured your initial shot, you might have been better getting much lower down and to the front of the butterfly to try and make it more engaging for the viewer. There isn't much of a hope of getting close with a macro lens so I think a good subsitute would be a telephoto to get you in closer. I know that when i have tried to shoot butterflies, I have found that the telephoto on a tripod helps because I'm not that close that I disturb the butterfly and I can still get fairly close in.

I have had a go at a little mod for your image where I have cropped in even more, lightened the shadow under the wing, enhanced the colour slightly and darkened the rocks. I then sharpened.

Hope this helps

DaVeS

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
26 Apr 2012 - 10:10 AM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Sooty_1
Sooty_1 (Critique Team)
2
964 forum posts United Kingdom161 Constructive Critique Points
26 Apr 2012 - 10:10 AM
0

Unfortunately, I think you were on the wrong side of the butterfly! Having the heavy shadow this side, and the angle of the wing, makes it a little awkward.
Exposure is good, though you could definitely lose some of the rock from the frame.
It doesn't look particularly sharp. None of it does, so I don't think it's a focus issue, and the shutter speed should have been high enough (though it does look like camera shake), so I'm guessing something to do with your sharpening/resizing method.
Incidentally, why do you have random CAPITALISED and highlighted words in your text?

Nick

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.