Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Search Results for "Focus Stacking depth of field"
Articles
Book Reviews
Sue Bishop is one of the foremost flower photographers in the UK and with Charlie Waite was a founder of Light and Land. In this well written book she shares some of her techniques and gives advice on many topics including equipment, lighting, depth of field, the colour circle and more. The book contains many stunning photographs as well as a number of case studies illustrating the techniques used. I was a little disappointed that studio lighting was not covered but on the whole I'd recommend...
Yet another book on Digital Photography, now in its second edition, and with the Idiots guide title youll either be embarrassed to be seen with it or wont mind, knowing that youre sure to find help as you enter into this type of photography. Its written by an experienced American professional photographer and starts with an unnecessary six-page intro of the history of photography! Then it covers the benefits and disadvantages of digital along with who will find a digital camera useful. Here it p...
Light and Lens takes you through an educational photographic journey. The author writes with obvious in depth knowledge about the various aspects of photography with the intention of helping you understand the visualisation of the art rather then just providing a how to book. It touches on history and has a section of thought provoking questions with answers. Every aspect from exposure to printing is covered, and there are some really clear diagrams to help you get your head around topics such a...
You may think the cover portrait is a tad dull and uninspiring (the repro of this image has more contrast on the inside version), but open this 128 page book and you'll find far better examples inside. The author, David Wilson, aims to introduce amateurs and semi-professionals to the varied world of portraiture. It covers techniques to improve composition, rapport, exposure, lighting and much more. the book includes extended captions of around 200 words per picture that are tips and technique...
Great soft focus image on the cover that, being a bloke, makes you want to pick it up and look further. If you're interested in the female form you'll love this book. But the point of the book is to give you advice and inspiration to master composition, lighting and exposure when photograph the nude. Question is...will it? Once again there's RotoVision's jerky text style that can halt the reading process, but I'm currently absorb by a fascinating collection of beautiful women...naked... so th...
Challenges
pictures of small native to the uk mamals
Summer has Britain full of lovely golden fields of crops such as wheat and barley. This challenge is to post the best shot you've got of these crops, be it close up or of the field as a whole - but it must STILL BE STANDING
Directories

| Website: | www.flaghead.co.uk |
| Address: | PO Box 6143, Poole, Dorset, BH12 9AS, United Kingdom |
| Phone: | 01202 733 123 |
| View This Listing | |

| Website: | www.karltaylorphotography.co.uk |
| Address: | Caslon Court, Pitronnerie Road,, St Peter Port, Guernsey, Channel Islands, GY1 2RW, United Kingdom |
| Phone: | 01481 724455 |
| View This Listing | |

| Website: | www.skye.co.uk |
| Address: | Isle of Skye & Lochalsh, Scotland |
| Phone: | Visit: www.skye.co.uk |
| View This Listing | |

| Website: | www.picstop.co.uk |
| Address: | Unit 37, Isle of Man Business Park, Douglas, Isle of Man, IM2 2QZ, United Kingdom |
| Phone: | 0845 257 5552 |
| View This Listing | |

| Website: | www.graysofwestminster.co.uk |
| Address: | 40 Churton Street, London, SW1V 2LP, England |
| Phone: | 020-7828 4925 |
| View This Listing | |

| Website: | www.thebfp.com |
| Address: | Focus House, 497 Green Lanes, London, N13 4BP, United Kingdom |
| Phone: | 020 8882 3315 |
| View This Listing | |
| Website: | www.imagesphotoclub.com |
| Address: | Restaurant Gember @ The Museum of Photography, The Hague, Netherlands |
| View This Listing | |

| Website: | www.oca-uk.com |
| Address: | Unit 1B, Redbrook Business Park, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S75 1JN, England |
| Phone: | 0800 731 2116 |
| View This Listing | |

| Website: | www.oneworld-images.com |
| Address: | 1 Munro Close, Kidderminster, Worcs, DY10 3XX, United Kingdom |
| Phone: | 01562 750430 |
| View This Listing | |

| Website: | www.hahnemuehle.com |
| Address: | Unit 12, Waterways Business Centre, South Ordnance Road, Enfield, Middlesex, EN3 6JJ, United Kingdom |
| Phone: | 0845 3300129 |
| View This Listing | |
Downloads
Podcast technique to show you how to reduce the depth of field.
A selection of vouchers for you to download, print off and cut out for your trip to Focus on Imaging 2008. Take these to the relevant stands to get great ePHOTOzine exclusive deals and discounts.





A review of the Pentax K100D Super.
Podcast of the Monster Pod Tripod.
Podcast review of the the Sony A100
Review of the build quality of the Canon 400D,Nikon D40x,Olympus E500,Pentax K100D Super and Sony A100.
Podcast of the performance test for the Canon 400D,Nikon D40x,Olympus E500,Pentax K100D Super and Sony A100
Podcast of the noise test for the Canon 400D,Nikon D40x,Olympus E500,Pentax K100D Super and Sony A100.
FAQs
- Be polite and respectful in your comments. Insulting comments will be deleted.
- Remember: you are trying to help and encourage your fellow ePhotozine members.
- Avoid misunderstanding: nuances of speech and facial expressions cannot come over in writing.
- Do not use the copy & paste technique to flood the gallery with meaningless comments.
- The original poster may contact you to seek clarification on your comments. Feel free to add any further comments or suggestions on the poster's photo.
Before you comment
Study the image and form an opinion of what does or does not appeal to you, both technically and aesthetically.
Identify technical qualities that appeal or do not appeal:
- focus
- camera shake
- contrast
- colour (including colour casts)
- lighting
- exposure
- digital noise, artefacts etc.
- depth of field
- background
- composition
- choice of lens
Do the same with the aesthetic qualities: assess any emotional response you get from the picture. Say what is your response and try to explain why the image evokes that response:
- Is the eye led in or around the pic?
- Is there a discernible subject?
- Good balance between subject and background?
- Any parts of the subject lost unintentionally?
- Could crop be better?
- If theres a horizon is it level?
Commenting
- Begin your comments with what you like about the photo.
- Then go on to what you think needs improvement - offering suggestions as to how the photo can be improved. Give reasons as necessary.
- Do not argue the validity of another members comments on the photo or get into a debate on the critique.
- There is nothing wrong with saying "Nice pic" but say exactly why you think it is nice - be specific on the technical and aesthetic qualities which appeal.
- Be polite and respectful in your comments. Insulting comments will be deleted.
- Remember: you are trying to help and encourage your fellow ePhotozine members
- Avoid misunderstanding: nuances of speech and facial expressions cannot come over in writing.
- Do not use the copy & paste technique to flood the gallery with meaningless comments.
- The original poster may contact you to seek clarification on your comments. Feel free to add any further comments or suggestions on the poster's photo.
Before you comment
Study the image and form an opinion of what does or does not appeal to you, both technically and aesthetically.
Identify technical qualities that appeal or do not appeal:
- focus
- camera shake
- contrast
- colour (including colour casts)
- lighting
- exposure
- digital 'noise', artefacts etc.
- depth of field
- background
- composition
- choice of lens
Do the same with the aesthetic qualities: assess any emotional response you get from the picture. Say what is your response and try to explain why the image evokes that response:
- Is the eye led in or around the pic?
- Is there a discernible subject?
- Good balance between subject and background?
- Any parts of the subject lost unintentionally?
- Could crop be better?
- If there's a horizon is it level?
Commenting
- Begin your comments with what you like about the photo.
- Then go on to what you think needs improvement - offering suggestions as to how the photo can be improved. Give reasons as necessary.
- Do not argue the validity of another member's comments on the photo or get into a debate on the critique.
- There is nothing wrong with saying 'Nice pic' but say exactly why you think it is nice - be specific on the technical and aesthetic qualities which appeal.
- Upload a modification if you think it will help, stating what you have done and, if possible, pitching the modifications at uploader's experience.
If you get a response to your advert and follow it up to get a reply that asks you to accept a cheque for a higher value than the item it's fraud. Do not respond, forward the email to the police.
Another clue is when the email request for details has the item you're selling place in brackets. Or when they ask for the price and it's stated in the ad. Avoid these too.
We have an article here that goes into more depth about classified advert scamming
The busiest day is Monday and Wednesday with Tuesday and Thursday close behind. Friday drops a little, as does Sunday. Saturday is the quietest day.
If you post at a busy time your photo will soon disappear of the first page. If you post when it's quiet not many people will be around to click or comment. There's no ideal time to maximise the potential of your image being viewed and commented on.
If you give good feedback on other members' work that will often help you get feedback in return.
Why have X number of people said they like my photo, but I can only see Y comments. Is there an error?
It's not an error. Many visitors don't have time or feel compelled to leave a comment, but they can still click to say they like a photo without commenting.
The number next to the blue heart only represents how many people have clicked to say they like your photo. It bears no relation to the number of comments made.
From time to time, we purge our database of data relating to photos that have been deleted.
When this happens, all associated comments are deleted, as there's no point storing comments for a photo that doesn't exist.
When this happens, the number of comments you've made will decrease. This is nothing to worry about.
1 Abysmal
This is a strongly negative score and should be avoided, unless the photo is totally out of focus, badly composed and over or underexposed. One for the bin!
2 Terrible
Not quite the bottom of the barrel, but close. Use this when the photo features some of the technical problems such as out of focus, badly composed and over or underexposed.
3 Poor
This is starting to get a few good things right about it, but maybe lacks one element of technical quality or doesn't meet the challenge well enough.
4 Passable
All the technical elements are coming together and signs of a decent photo, but has a minor flaw here or there.
5 Run-of-the-mill
Use this rating when a photo doesn't affect you either way.
6 Decent
Starting to show positive aspects of composition, theme, focus or exposure but room for improvement.
7 Good
You like this, but there are still a few things that could be done better.
8 Very good
A really good photo with few, if any, flaws.
9 Excellent
Displays perfect technical ability in areas of focusing, exposure and composition. And meets the challenge theme 100%.
10 Unbeatable
Only rate photos at this level if it's genuinely one of the best you've seen.
Absolutely not. Although there is a critique team in place, to provide consistent comment, the whole idea of this gallery is to gain valuable insight and comment, from you, the member. The critique team will post alongside you with further comments and suggestions of their own of how to improve the photo.
Briefly try to point out what you were trying to achieve, and indicate any areas where you feel there is room for improvement.
It's important to note that members may make blunt statements. Remember they are not criticising you. They are offering an opinion on your photo. It's important not to get into debates or arguments over critique offered. If you need to seek further clarification fom the critic, feel free to do so in a polite and friendly manner.
It will probably be helpful to leave previous posted images up, if reworking and reposting an image. That way everyone can refer back to your first version. It may also be appropriate to contact the original critic to make them aware of the new upload so they can go back and take another look.
There will be a small number of more experienced photographers as part of the critique team. Some of these will have specific experience in a given subject/area. If you feel you need additional guidance please feel free to contact the critique team on (email address option coming soon)
Exhibitions
A visual directory of photography exhibitions around the globe.
Editor's role
Keep the section up to date, delete any spam, correct spelling
Research galleries/events.
Add new venues to the directory.
Add new exhibitions.
Attend opening nights and meet hosts/photographer.
Establish contacts within industry.
Encourage contacts to upload exhibitions.
Encourage photographers to be interviewed for Pro Portfolio section.
Spread the word.
Photo Locations
A collection of articles of locations around the world for taking good photographs. Includes details of where, how to get there, what to photograph, tips and tricks (parking, time of day etc)
Editor's role
Keep the section up to date, correct spelling, factual errors, make new guides live.
Add new locations to the page.
Create a format for guides and encourage members to write new ones.
Add geo-tagging (coordinations) to ones missing from uploaded guides.
Go through existing guides and add geo-tagging.
When visiting chatrooms/other relevant forums/emails etc mention the section when necessary without it appearing as spam.
Spread the word.
Book reviews
A selection of informative book reviews with ratings and links to buy.
Editor's role
Keep the section up to date, correct spelling, factual errors, make new reviews live.
Add new reviews to the page.
Add Amazon links direct to books and keep them updated.
Make sure all books are in correct subject/field.
Encourage users to submit book reviews.
Establish contacts and create contact book of publishing press teams.
Encourage contacts to upload news stories.
Spread the word.
Pro Portfolios
A collection of interviews/articles of professional photographers with a few illustrative photos
Editor's role
Keep the section up to date, correct spelling, factual errors, make new interviews live.
Look for interesting pros and get in touch.
Interview using email questions or face to face.
Add new interviews to the page
Create a format for interviews and encourage members to contact photographers and add new ones
Go through existing portfolios and add subject field and tidy up
Spread the word.
Glossary
A collection of photographic words with clear explanations and illustrative photos
Editor's role
Keep the section up to date, correct spelling, factual errors, make new submissions live.
Add pictures to sections when extra functionality added.
Add new words.
Expand on existing ones to make them clearer/more detailed.
Encourage others to submit words/suggest changes.
Spread the word..
2 You must select modifications option when uploading and state in the gallery description box what the challenge is.
3. Any submission that appears to be taken before the competition started will be disqualified.
4. Any submission posted after the closing image is uploaded will also be disqualified.
5. It's just for fun and a challenge, details of any prizes will be announced along with the challenge.
6. The person who uploads the challenge is the judge for that week.
7. The winner gets to run the challenge next week and judge.
8. As this uses the modifications feature, the winner needs to be an e2 member but if not, another member may step in and upload a challenge for you.
9. If the winner is on holiday the following week he/she can select another member to upload and take care of the challenge.
The image that you select can have a maximum image dimension of 600x600 pixels and must be smaller than 70K in filesize the space the file takes up on your hard drive or storage medium - if you are not an e2 member.
If you are an e2 member then you can upload pictures with an image dimension of up to 1000x1000 pixels. Please try to make the filesize smaller than 200K if possible.
In order to do this click here to read our article on image resizing
Click the text and you will be taken to the album creation screen..
Fill in the name you want your album to have.
Next fill in the description field with some informative text about your album.
Click on the "Create Album" button.
The screen will clear and you will see an Add Image link.
Click on the link and you will be taken to a page where you can choose one of your images to add to the album.
To add an image just click on it.
The page changes again to show your chosen image.
You can also add another image, remove the image, change the image or set it as the album cover (the image people will see before they open your album).
When you have finished adding images just click the "View Albums" button again to be taken back to the Albums page.
Job done!
Just a couple of things to be aware of.
Albums can be Public or Private. If you set an album to Private then nobody will be able to see the images it contains even though they are in the Gallery and your Portfolio, they will be marked as private and not displayed anywhere on the site.
If you remove images from a Private Album it is possible that they will remain hidden in the Gallery and your Portfolio!
Make the album Public first before removing images.
Vote on a scale from 1 to 10 using the descriptions of the ratings below to help you.
Please use the rating system sensibly and do not over or under rate for members you do or don't like. We can track ratings and will remove the rating feature from those who abuse the system.
1 Abysmal
This is a strongly negative score and should be avoided, unless the photo is totally out of focus, badly composed and over or underexposed. One for the bin!
2 Terrible
Not quite the bottom of the barrel, but close. Use this when the photo features some of the technical problems such as out of focus, badly composed and over or underexposed.
3 Poor
This is starting to get a few good things right about it, but maybe lacks one element of technical quality or doesn't meet the challenge well enough.
4 Passable
All the technical elements are coming together and signs of a decent photo, but has a minor flaw here or there.
5 Run-of-the-mill
Use this rating when a photo doesn't affect you either way.
6 Decent
Starting to show positive aspects of composition, theme, focus or exposure but room for improvement.
7 Good
You like this, but there are still a few things that could be done better.
8 Very good
A really good photo with few, if any, flaws.
9 Excellent
Displays perfect technical ability in areas of focusing, exposure and composition. And meets the challenge theme 100%.
10 Unbeatable
Only rate photos at this level if it's genuinely one of the best you've seen.
Think about the challenge topic/theme when voting, and adjust your score accordingly.
At the end of the challenge Period, the photograph displaying the highest average score will be deemed the winner.
It is encouraged to leave comments i.e. praise, If however you feel a photograph deserves a bellow average score (four or less) try and leave a comment with your vote explaining your reason, the poster of the challenge entry may find this information useful.
Please refrain from voting on your own photographs or those of others from multiple user accounts, do not vote in a way as to suggests intent to disrupt the voting system or vote from another members account, penalties for misuse of the challenge gallery can be imposed on offenders.
Vote on a scale from 1 to 10 using the descriptions of the ratings below to help you.
Please use the rating system sensibly and do not over or under rate for members you do or don't like. We can track ratings and will remove the rating feature from those who abuse the system.
1 Abysmal
This is a strongly negative score and should be avoided, unless the photo is totally out of focus, badly composed and over or underexposed. One for the bin!
2 Terrible
Not quite the bottom of the barrel, but close. Use this when the photo features some of the technical problems such as out of focus, badly composed and over or underexposed.
3 Poor
This is starting to get a few good things right about it, but maybe lacks one element of technical quality or doesn't meet the challenge well enough.
4 Passable
All the technical elements are coming together and signs of a decent photo, but has a minor flaw here or there.
5 Run-of-the-mill
Use this rating when a photo doesn't affect you either way.
6 Decent
Starting to show positive aspects of composition, theme, focus or exposure but room for improvement.
7 Good
You like this, but there are still a few things that could be done better.
8 Very good
A really good photo with few, if any, flaws.
9 Excellent
Displays perfect technical ability in areas of focusing, exposure and composition. And meets the challenge theme 100%.
10 Unbeatable
Only rate photos at this level if it's genuinely one of the best you've seen.
Think about the challenge topic/theme when voting, and adjust your score accordingly.
At the end of the challenge Period, the photograph displaying the highest average score will be deemed the winner.
It is encouraged to leave comments i.e. praise, If however you feel a photograph deserves a bellow average score (four or less) try and leave a comment with your vote explaining your reason, the poster of the challenge entry may find this information useful.
Please refrain from voting on your own photographs or those of others from multiple user accounts, do not vote in a way as to suggests intent to disrupt the voting system or vote from another members account, penalties for misuse of the challenge gallery can be imposed on offenders.
Forum
How can it be considered cheating? Like the hilariously funny thread about HDR, ANY technique to strengthen the impact of an image is just that - a technique... And it all started with Fox-Talbot!!! Ever since the Ab Initio days, photographers has sought to enhance their work!!! Can we close BOTH threads now please!! Why the heck shouldn't we discuss these things?! Some of us are n...
Forum: Photographic discussion
Depth of field with Macro lens
Thanks for the link conrad :) might be a little less confused now.
Forum: Lenses
Depth of Field
A lot of creative focus is waaay overdone IMHO. It doesn't need an awful lot of blur to make your intended object of attention the only one the viewer looks at. The eye is drawn naturally to the sharpest point of the image, especially if it has lead lines or is on a point of thirds. OK theres a problem if you have glaring highlights - but then that's your fault for not composing better ;)
Forum: Photographic discussion
Depth of field in digital cameras
Depth of field is a very complex thing. Basically any lens produces a totally sharp image with zones in front and behind the sharp image which appear to be sharp. Note the word appears to be!!. The area that appears to be in focus is dependant on the focal length of the lens and the amount by which the image can go out of focus before the human eye can detect it . A totally sharp image of a po...
Forum: Digital cameras
Help! Nikon N65 depth of field preview.
That lens is not competable totally so not a camera problem it is the sub standrad lens.
Forum: Taking photos
Calculating depth of field
Another thought.. since you are on about macro photography, lay out a flat ruler and photograph that at various apertures.. that'll give you a better idea of dof and distances that are involved. Also when looking at near and far dof the usual maxim is that dof is 1/3 in front and 2/3 behind the point of focus. In macro photography however dof extends more like 1/2 in front and 1/2 half behin...
Forum: Taking photos
I was not being argumentative Stan, just making a valid point, that may not be appreciated by beginners. We are not all 'experts' on this site. One further point ;o) It's not much use being awash with theory and technical jargon if you can't see or compose a picture. PS Who mentioned Aston Martins? Didn't know they made cameras ;o)
Forum: Taking photos
Depth of field ?
Sensia as good as Provia- very little between then, - as good as Velvia- no, but I want the extra stop. Once you take price and handiness into the equation there is no contest. That lens does sound good value, but check around the other main shops in town before buying. If any shop has a sigma 70-300 apo for a similar price give it serious consideration too. (try them on the camera, the Sigma ...
Forum: Taking photos
How to use depth of field preview
Thanks for all the replies. I have a Pentax MZ6 which allows full manual control, so I'll line up a few objects and have a play as durlstonp suggests. I have experimented before, but the objects within the view were all on a similar plane so I guess I wouldn't have seen much even if I knew what I was looking for. G
Forum: Taking photos
Perhaps it helps someone: the depth mask (pdf) lens blur simple one
Forum: Photographic discussion
Amazing Depth of Field
As a point of interest on the preceding: The fuji S602Z has a 5 bladed iris diaphram. It can be clearly seen at max zoom setting and to open and close as it pointed to and from a bright light source in the auto mode. jas
Forum: Digital cameras
Depth of field preview
I think that's more of a rule of thumb than carved in stone - and I also think it depends on which lens you are talking about as well
Forum: Photographic discussion
Depth of Field Button
Thanks Guys.
Forum: Taking photos
Depth-of-Field - estimating distances
Hi You have got me thinking now. I think it was MINOLTA who introduced an attachment for their telephoto lens`s to turn it into a telescope. I do not think it would be to much trouble to make an attachment to fit to an old say prime lens that has a good distance scale on the barrel. you just look thru, turn the focus ring till the split image or microprism aligns up, then read the distance....
Forum: Photographic discussion
Depth-of-Field table for Sigma 180 Macro
Thats interesting, the Sigma supplied tables that I got use 0.0333 and the ones I created used 0.03 based on Big Bri's formula. This assumes 35mm, or course!
Forum: Photographic discussion
Glossary
On some Ricoh cameras MPOs are created from the Multi-Target AF mode, where seven photos are taken in quick succession, each at slightly different focus points. The files can then be merged to create a focus stack, with incredible depth-of-field.
News
Pro Portfolios
Andrew Cowin was born in High Wycombe in 1954. Andrew studied at the University of Southampton from 1972 to 1977. He obtained a First Class Honours Degree in History and did a one-year Postgraduate Certificate of Education before receiving an M.A. in Medi
Matilda Lindeblad recently returned to Sweden after four years abroad in New York, London and Paris. She is an independent woman who knows what she wants and loves a challenge. 'It's a matter of getting yourself into a situation and then finding a solutio
Kasia & Mariusz Wloczysiak (Poland) When we met in June 2003, there was a sense of something exciting awaiting us. We knew from our very first contacts that fine art nude photography was the major field of interest to both of us. Neither of us could th
Bernhard Edmaier - seeking beauty in the form and colour of the Earth' s crust. Edmaier' s passion is seeing the world from above, as he feels that nature' s abstract beauty is only truly revealed from a bird' s-eye perspective.
Hans Van Ommeren is a photographer who likes to bring his subjects to life. He is constantly driven to explore new avenues and keep on experimenting. Hans van Ommeren is one the Hasselblad Masters - 12 highly skilled photographers, carefully chosen
Ian Patrick is a successful fashion and advertising photographer who jets around the world on assignments for Perrier/Vitel, Christian La Croix, Yves Saint Laurent and other big names. He is one of the Hasselblad Masters - 12 highly skilled photographe
Michael Grecco, an American with Italian roots, has worked for half his 43 years as a professional photographer. Amongst his list of clients you will find magazines such as, Entertainment Weekly, Esquire, Premier, Movie Line, Business Week, Forbes, Rollin
Transforming architecture into art Danish architectural photographer Per Nagel and architect Vibe Udsen are joint founders and publishers of the architectural magazine Living Architecture. The magazine is very exclusive and is based on the simple philo
Howard Schatz is impassioned about making photographs. He is not just driven, he is insatiable. Schatz photographs people. His work in portraiture, fashion, action, sports, and dance has been published all over the world. His recent work with the human
Per Zennstrom worked for six years as an assistant in Stockholm and New York. Thereafter he went to Paris where he now works as a fashion and advertising photographer. Per Zennstrom creates his images without thinking too much about what's 'in' or what's
Now considered one of the UK's leading landscape photographers, Charlie Waite began his career as an actor and stage assistant, but later switched to photographing actors instead. Now, 28 years later, Charlie is completely engrossed in landscape photo
Juan Zi studied fine art, fashion design and photography for several years in China and started to use camera and film as a means to create and express her artistic nature. In 1995 she began to work as a professional photographer and has since then made a
Markus Richter was born on 1st March 1966 in Konstanz on the Bodensee to an old family of artists. His greatest joy when growing up was to paint and to play with his grandfather's old mirror reflex cameras. He demonstrates an intense, personal and pr
Dennis Morris is not only well known for his work with Bob Marley and also The Sex Pistols, but is also renowned for other iconic images such as his shots of Marianne Faithfull - seen as an important contributor to the success of her career re-launch.
Peter Watson is a fine art landscape photogrpher based in England. He photographs both in colour and black & white using a large format 5x4" view camera or occasionally a 6x17cm panoramic camera. His reputation has been built on his distinctive limited
Techniques
Videos
Join Our Free Newsletter
Current Competitions
Vanguard 'Long Exposure' Exclusive Competition - Open to European Entries!
1st March 2010 - 31st March 2010
With the promise of longer evenings to come and more light, we thought the theme of 'Long Exposure' was rather apt!Images can be of any subjec...
Light - Win over £1,400 worth of Photographic kit - Just one lucky winner!
1st March 2010 - 31st March 2010
As British Summertime starts at the end of March, plus the fact that we are all crying out for some sunshine and brighter evenings, we have themed this month's compe...March Photo Month
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.















































