Any photograph of Liverpool gets my vote! I would use the lead in lines to full effect and ensure that the lines go precisely to the very corners, this will take the image more into the realms of graphic art.

BTW I'm friends with Jimmy Case on Facebook LOL!

Andrew.

Quote: A superb portrait, the detail is excellent. Love his self assured stare. The only tiny thing that bothers me from perfection is the right side of his hat is missing. It's funny the top doesn't bother me at all, so I have no idea why the side does. Just silly me probably.............Sandy

Sandy you're, right, the right of his hat should be showing and I think Phil, you could've been braver and as you have cropped the top of his hat off, you could've taken even more off and that would have bought his eyes nearer to the top third, at the moment they are just above the halfway point. Despite my minor niggles this is mono portrait photography at its very best - he wouldn't look out of place in a Lord of the Rings Movie - he has a slight Gandalf (Ian McKellan) look about him!

Best of luck with it.

Andrew.

The image you are talking about, I believe was rejected many times before eventually being accepted as a poster. Fiona Butler (aged 18) was the tennis player and Martin Elliot was the photographer. He sadly died a year ago this month with Cancer, he was 63.

To emulate the original the light needs to be stronger, the original had rim lighting (contre jour lighting) around her hair and legs (not than anyone noticed the lighting of course!). The lighting here is far too flat. You really need a sunny day. Your balls are certainly well placed.

A good attempt all the same!

Andrew.

Light trails or traffic trails are really fun to do and this is a good attempt. A tripod is always a good idea (I know they are a pain to carry round) but do ensure firm support for the long exposure that this type of photography requires. You do have some camera shake which has spoilt this image a little. It woul be well worth having another go (if you are in the area). When it has just been raining is a good time as you get some great reflections off the surface of the road.

On a presentation note, I would avoid adding your name to the image. It does spoil it. Maybe try a border and add your name into the border. Names on the image just spoil a good shot.

Andrew.

I suppose it would help if I commented on the image as well

The composition is spot on, my only minor change would have been to put the white side on top to contrast more with the black background, and maybe a slight crop off the left to put the cube off centre, although it's fine as it is.

Andrew.

I take your point, some people don't mind converging verticals, some people can't abide them. I've always been taught (by camera club judges) to straighten your verticals.

As an architectural shot it falls down as buildings are usually built vertical, as a record of the pier head and its architecture it's superb.

I, personally, think it will be worth the effort to straighten up the shot but at the end of the day it's your image and if you are happy with it then leave it as it is. I enjoy using the transform tool although you can end up by correcting one half of the image distorting the other. It's all a learning curve I suppose - or should that be a leaning curve!!!

Andrew.

This is a very familiar scene and one I pass every day as I go to work. It is usually preferable to shoot night scenes just after sunset (usually about 15-30 minutes) when there is still some light left in the sky, this will shorten your exposure and will therefore stop your highlights from burning out (they just appear as white with no detail). This time of day is called crossover light and is when the ambient light and artificial light reflect the same amount of light. Your sky will display much more interesting colours, reds, yellows, blues and oranges and the roofs of buildings won't blend into the sky (dark skies and dark roofs tend to blend into each other).

I have an album of Twilight photographs in my portfolio that illustrate the above points.

Good luck with your photography. I took my very first night photograph from Tower Road (The Four Bridges) way back in 1990!

Andrew.

Superb shot, I was there in May this year, a fascinating place to visit. The weather hasn't been too kind to you and the sky is looking a little bland. It may be worth selecting it and either making it a light grey or a pale blue. Your eye will always go to the brightest part of the image, which is the sky in this case, unfortunately it's the least interesting!

I had the same problem with an Image I had taken in M'dina. I used the grad tool and picked a couple of colours to make the sky look more eerie. ***link***

Great effort, I've not photographed the Echo Wheel myself but have been tempted a couple of times. I'm from "the other side!"

You've just left it a little late, with night time photography (or strictly twilight) the best time is usually 15-25 minutes after sunset, you have a little longer if you are shooting towards the sunset, this way you have more colours in the sky, oranges, reds, yellows and deep blues and even clouds. It also means your highlights don't burn out, as with the extra light a shorter exposure time will be required.

Try it again if you are in the area and you'll see the difference.

Here's a couple of my efforts from a while ago which illustrate my points:-

***link*** Salthouse Dock

***link*** Blackpool Pier

I hope this helps.

Andrew.

A Harley isn't a motorbike, it's a work of Art, I remember seeing one up close and was just amazed at how fantastic they looked, I'm not even into motorbikes. Just be careful with your background, I know there was little you could do (like pick it up and move it!) but you really need a studio to do a subject like this justice! It still gets my vote!

Andrew.

Very original indeed, superb work. Just needs a little more room around the image to allow it to 'breathe' and maybe a darker base for the bust to 'sit on' otherwise something quite different.

A good effort.

Andrew.

Hi key portraits are difficult to get right as many of them just look as though they have been drastically overexposed and burnt out. The key to high key is to maintain detail even though most of the image is almost white. You chosen your model well here and the eyes are clearly magic!

I would just remove the mark below her left eye and just below the left of her lip. Even though they are natural, as the image is not an accurate representation it is acceptable to remove minor blemishes.

An excellent shot.

Andrew.

An intriguing portrait - try and avoid "shooting up her nose", as it's not the most flattering of angles. You've handled the shadows cast by the flash very well.

Andrew.

I love this a lot. I only visit the Tate once or twice a year but I am often drawn to the windows and the views that they offer. I love this image especially as in the distance you can see the coast of Wallasey - My home town for the last 41 years! It's Egremont and the start of New Brighton (Vale Park) that you can see.

I agree with the comments already made, It's quite difficult to get the natural light and ambient light levels spot on. This is a good effort. Worth trying just a very small amount of fill-in flash to add a little detail to the silhouette (which will stop it becoming a silhouette!), but it's certainly fine as it is.

You do have black spaces either side of the window, it may be worth cropping some of the black space out and presenting it more as a square format - or even in portrait format. It does need some black, but not quite that much.

Andrew.

I love Malta (visited in April/May 2010) and this is a good attempt at the exciting world of night photography. I agree with the points already mind. I would like to make a further point:-

Pictures taken at night are fine but this will increase the contrast in the image, meaning everything is either very light or very dark, which is fine. Taking it just 15-25 minutes after sunset will leave some interesting colours in the sky, reds, yellows, blues, oranges as opposed to just plain black. In landscape photography the sky is one of the most important elements of the photograph, to some respect that carries through to twilight photography. Take it just after sunset and see the difference. See my image of Jodrell bank below and you'll see what I mean.

link

I hope this helps.

Andrew.

Anthony moving into portraiture, whatever next?!!

This is a superb effort, a dedent model to start with (i.e. a photogenic one) is probably the most important thing in portraiture, getting the lighting and background right is the next stage.

The background is no problem here, classic, timeless black. It's hair lighting that most people struggle with, if not enough light is applied to the hair the darkness of the hair will match the dark background and will just merge. This is not always a desirable effect. A small light can be placed behind the model to act as rimlight around the hair, or alternatively, just above the head.

A good effort, just be careful with your shadows, they look very harsh and on a young lady this is not a good effect, soften your lighting and use either a reflector or another light on the opposite side of her face (the darker side) to even up the lighting slightly.

Hope this helps.

Andrew.

A totally gorgeous upload. Almost looks like a still from a film or an Asian music video.

It's not quite perfect though (but alomst!). I would have changed the pose slightly just to give some separation from her body and legs, just to give the body better definition and make a stronger silhouette, maybe sit slightly further back (a foot) and stretch her legs out a little further. It's about 95% there but just not quite 100%. Also some of the silhouette is merging with the background, especially on the horizon, a step to the left would have avoided this and would not change the composition significantly.

Still a excellent shot.

Andrew.

It's well worth trying something a little different every now and again, it keeps your photography fresh and inspirational. I've even done some photography in this little cathedral myself.

The only little niggle for me is the light immediately above the bible, by propping up the bible a little, with say a wallet or cigarette packet that would have eliminated those lights. The ones at the top of the picture although are also distracting but don't blend into the bible like the white light does. A lower viewpoint would have also worked but you wouldn't have been able to see as much of the text on the page so propping up the bible would have been the preferred option.

Andrew.

A good attempt at an interesting genre of photography. I've said this many times, the key to these type of shots is making it believable, a real scene, for example a football match, waiting in a queue/bus stop, playing a game of some sort/cards/roulette. Use your imagination and you can end up with a surreal series of images that can really make people sit up and take note. A good attempt and you should persevere.

My friend David Griffiths has been quite successful at this genre and maybe you should look at some of his work:

Come on England: link
Billy no mates throws a party: (a massive 59 votes at the moment!)
link

There are a couple more in his portfolio that you should look at at your leisure.

I hope this helps.

Andrew.

A Beautiful model with captivating eyes, she is well lit, tightly cropped and and the background is suitably subdued.

For me, it's her hand on her head that just doesn't work, think about it logically, when would a person naturally pose like that. It just looks a little awkward (sorry for sounding harsh, but I'm a little surprised no-one has picked up on it yet).

One of the most difficult things in modeling is knowing what to do with the model's hands (and arms). Try studying the work of some photographers in this site - JANEYO link is an excellent photographer and see how she poses her models, she is a shining example to everyone.

It's still an excellent photograph but the pose just needs to be different.

Andrew.