Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
I don't know if you applied the spectral additions in post production, or if it's all down to a dirty Lens &Sensor combination (if that could work in this way). Whatever the outcome works well in a curious way and gives your picture a bit of a 'Turner' feel, that might be further improved with some carefully controlled selective softening, nice work well done.
Superbly executed photo Matt and you obviously have a good eye for an image, though the wide angle has induced a bit of lean on the mill tower, somewhere in the back of my mind, something seems to be telling me that there is a Nikon dedicated lens distortion correction software out there that may help you sort that problem and hopefully without loosing the overall dynamic affect, including those streaked clouds (could be in Nikon NX View) but check out the web.
Affirmative Steve it is a Silver 'Y' though your image is rather soft in places, no doubt due to the angle that you have chosen to photograph this moth from, the problem is that Depth of Field (Sharp Focus range over the subject) is always inclined to be shallow with Macro shots and exasperated by the the long focal length you have used (zoom setting) and the fact that these moths are the sort that hold their wings in a tent like fashion when at rest, next time try to get overhead and keep the camera at right angles to your subject (make all your settings prior to moving in on the subject for least disturbance)and also use a smaller aperture too, f/5.6 is far too wide unless you are deliberately trying to draw attention to only a very small part of you image, f/11 or f/16 is more ideal, any more than this will give other problems with image softening though can be used if the situation demands it. Taking control of your aperture will mean getting into Manual or Aperture Priority mode though, so refer to your camera's instruction book if you are not sure how to do this, any way well done for getting this beast at rest as they flutter incessantly otherwise and good luck
Nice image with good light /modelling on the cliff face (central) The L/H horizon is over bright in relation to the rest of the picture and gives the impression of sloping down to the lower L/H/S, either crop this edge to reduce the effect or a tweek of levels in your raw converter may help, though I guess this may be caused by lens distortion, so a distortion correction plug-in may do the job a bit better, but overall a good effort
Hi Smee, I've only just seen your other effort "Captain's Log" It's a great picture and in a different league to the two previous images that I have reviewed for you. I particularly like the contrast both in terms of colour and textural contrast between the fall and the pool below, that splash of sunshine hitting the water works a treat and the exposure in this part of the picture is bang on, also your presentation is excellent. There is still room for improvement though, the biggest and only major fault is that bit of what looks like a tree stump poking out into the bottom R/H side and to add injury to insult your Highlights blown out on the top edge of it! (Trees seem to be bit of a stumbling block to you at the moment, as a rule of thumb, unless you are making them the focal point keep them in the background! Though they can be used sometimes to frame a view if kept to the periphery) to be honest it's a clumsy distraction in what otherwise would be a truly excellent photograph, remember "That simplicity is the essence of good design". Resist the temptation to include these additional elements, they are not needed. It's also important to remember that any bright spot in an image will draw the eye. The only other thing to comment on and at a minor level, is that I feel that water in the fall could benefit from being slightly lighter, this latter issue could have been resolved at the moment of taking by balancing the exposure with the use of a relevant strength N/D Graduated Filter or later in post-production by adjusting your levels, preferably in your Raw Editor. as a final note: It might help you to have work flow list and checks for setting up your camera before a shoot and get into the routine of using it every time, things to include are: Focus Point, Depth of Field, Exposure, Controlling Dynamic Tone Range, Composition, ISO, White Balance and a final in your list should be a test exposure with review and adjustment if needed etc. One of the advantages of Landscapes, is that they cannot run away from us so slowing down is not the problem found in genre's of photography and another saying: "We are what we do most, therefore excellence is a habit".
Great shot in the making with good rendition of the water in the fall, but a little untidy in places, It is subjective but I feel that a slight crop would make for a stronger image, loose the L/H trunk & overhead branch, in this case they distract the eye from the focal point of your picture, there is also a scruffy tangle of small branches & litter just behind & to the right of the trunk, and the patch of water on the same side in the foreground is too light adding further distraction, finally you could trim back the bottom edge roughly in line with the base of that troublesome trunk, try it and see what you think. Note: This all could have been sorted at the taking stage with a little more observation and tighter framing, with landscape it is easy to get carried away with a good location, but it's always worth taking a little more time analyzing your scene and even revisiting at different times of year and to get a fresh perspectives, for instance this place would likely make for a great autumn shoot etc.
Hi Sue, This photo shows a lot of promise in regards to your composition, but falls down badly in the processing department. I do not know exactly you are doing bar the fact that the image is recorded in jpeg format and displays a strong over processed look, witness the halo effect around the large rock/focal point in your picture, it also looks as if it is oversharpend as the end result looks very harsh giving an un natural look, for most images little or no sharpening is required, many cameras apply a degree of additional sharpening to start with! To overcome the contrast problems that are leading to that halo, there are a number of differing routes so I won't go into detail, HDR is already mentioned, another good starting point is to shoot in your cameras RAW format if you can, as it's a lot more forgiving than jpegs in the processing department, the use of Nutral Density Graduate Filters at the taking stage can be helpful in the right situation, but there is a lot of advanced technique within all these methods so you might do well to go and get some tuition in the relative areas. Online tutorials, joining a local photo class or club are just some options, you clearly have agood eye so taking this further would be well worthwhile. In the meantime just go a lot more gently with those sliders in your editor.
|Giottos MTL 9351B tripod tool kit anyone?||01/07/2013 - 9:13 PM|
|any advice for||19/04/2013 - 9:44 PM|
|Medium format advice||16/01/2013 - 3:32 PM|
|777mm filter choice||10/12/2012 - 9:29 PM|
|Help!!!||20/10/2012 - 9:24 PM|
|Macro Sharpness||22/07/2012 - 9:32 PM|
|Which One?||16/06/2012 - 11:13 PM|
|Nikon D3100 or D5100 ??||17/05/2012 - 10:32 PM|
|Help! Macro focusing||05/05/2012 - 11:59 PM|
|best lens match for nikon - brand||18/04/2012 - 5:14 PM|
|Nikon D700 or D7000||19/02/2012 - 12:37 PM|
|Help - Resolution||11/01/2012 - 10:00 PM|
|Nikkor 40mm or 60mm or Sigma 70mm?||11/01/2012 - 9:49 PM|
|Lots of Skill - No photographs||05/01/2012 - 3:36 PM|
|Memory Card Puzzle||05/01/2012 - 2:52 PM|
No portfolios comments on yet.