Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

banehawi

Connect to User

loading
03/07/2015 - 10:36 PM

A Muslim Woman In A Mosque

A Muslim Woman In A MosqueNot an easy shot to get, - but I think it depends on where you are in the world.

For me, though I understand the desire to have a dark, contrasty silhouette, its too contrasty and dark overall. If this was restricted to the woman it could be better.

In addition with the large amount of busy, detailed space on the right, she looks quite lost in the frame.

So I would suggest lighter contrast, less saturation (which increases with contrast) and a crop that isolates the woman while retaining the sense of location.

Mod uploaded,


regards


Willie
02/07/2015 - 2:47 PM

Dawn, Cemetery Beach, Narooma

Dawn, Cemetery Beach, NaroomaHi Hob.

Its a lovely location. You have done well to discover the risks of using stacked filters; its a common occurrence, and as far as I know, you either use one filter with more stopping power, or, as Ive seen in some cases, very high quality filters from one of the manufacturers such as Lee may help. I will rely on someone else commenting with more experience on filters to confirm. The colour cast I usually see with stacked filters (Grads) is magenta/purple, - likely what you experienced?

You would usually use white balance to remove a cast in the RAW image, though if the cast is severe, the extent to which it can be removed may be limited.

Youve done a lot of post processing, so you have got the image according to you taste, so a mod such as mine may not suit what you wanted. It does straighten the horizon, removes more magenta, lifts shadows, and is sharpened.

I would suggest not going smaller than f/16 in most cases simply to improve your chances of a sharper image. Diffraction does cause a loss of sharpness below f/11 in most cases.

Presumably you used a very solid tripod or support, with either a remote shutter release, or the self timer release to prevent any camera shake? The slight softness here may well also be down to stacked filters.


Regards



Willie
01/07/2015 - 2:39 PM

Family

FamilyA lovely shot Gary. Certainly does show the bond between them.

Exposed nicely, with good detail.

I would brighten the mothers face a little as Paul suggests, - the baby is shading her to some extent.

Mod uploaded with this done. I used both an exposure increase and the shadow tool for this.


Regards


Willie
30/06/2015 - 1:52 PM

Shag

ShagThis is the general approach I used.

The white balance in the original is good as it is, the altered version to warm (you dad will be surprised I said that!)

In RAW, my changes to the original file, leaving WB as-is: exposure -0.4; highlights +8; shadows 0; whites +17; blacks -69; everything else at zero.

In PS, locate and se the black point, either using curves or leaves and the ALT key, or a threshold adjustment; the stat of black is even lower than the RAW adjustment btw. The centre of the eye is what I used that worked well for me. This puts some of the neck dark that your original, but I think looks more natural.

In PS, locate and set the white point, which is the tip of the bill. These changes affect contrast and fine tune white balance.

Some sharpening applied, and additional sharpening on the eye. Used the burn tool on the bill-beak to tone down highlight; removed a wisp of something from the beak.



regards


Willie

Brightened the light reflections in the eye.
25/06/2015 - 10:29 PM

Fisherman on lake

Fisherman on lakeThis is a really beautiful shot Juan.

Theres really not a great deal to suggest. I would crop this to a 16 X 9 format, as in the mod, and perhaps a little more contrast in the distant hills.

Perfection would have the fisherman more to the right, coming into the open area, but this is very close.



regards


Willie
25/06/2015 - 3:05 PM

Egiptian

EgiptianYou did well to get good detail with a slow shutter. Im sure the VR lens helped.

The bright shiny parts are probably unavoidable in a location such as this.

The main tweak I would suggest is to the overall colour tone, or white balance. It seems to be leaning towards blue, which is visible in the gold, and the white areas. So warming the image a little makes the gold look more gold.

Think about a crop to put a little more space on the left, as in the mod. The mod has a little sharpening in addition to these tweaks.



Regards



Willie
25/06/2015 - 4:23 AM

Time to move

Time to moveIts a good photo opportunity.

I dont think its pablo's eyes, - the image is soft overall. Part of this is due to very bright highlights, and, Im guessing, part isd due to the fact the Tigers are moving towards the camera. With the movement, and the wide aperture, focus will be easily compromised unless you are using focus tracking, - which I cant tell if you were.

The time on the camera is wrong, so I cant estimate the time of day, other than to say this was in bright direct sunshine, a difficult situation.

There is little evidence of the fence, though it could certainly contribute to softness.

I tried some sharpening in the mod, along with toning down highlights. Ive added catchlights in the eyesm cropped a little off the bottom, and added a little to the top, removing the grey strip, to position the tiger lower in the frame.


Take a look and see whats you think.


Regards


Willie
25/06/2015 - 3:59 AM

Catia

CatiaGood feedback from dark lord. Nice pose, and theres a trust relationship between both of you.

The light at this time is coming mainly from overhead, so the top of her hand, her forehead, are quite brightly lit; her eyes are shaded, and her nose has a slight shine, with a deep shadow underneath. This is all typical of overhead lighting, and it can often be dramatic.


Apart from removing the plant, I would like to see less glare from the brightest areas of her skin; the shadows reduced around her eyes and under her nose.


Thats about all I have done in the mod, - with a slight sharpening also.


Regards


Willie
24/06/2015 - 11:56 PM

Alley

AlleyI like what you did yourself Billy. Looks like a rock slide at the far end.


I took some of the original and some of your mod, and produced another version that shows a slight glowing light coming in behind the fallen rocks, with the entranceway a lot brighter.


See what you think.


Regards


Willie
24/06/2015 - 9:59 PM

On The Alert.

On The Alert.Pose is good, hand is on the sword, colour is way over saturated.


Looking at your raw adjustments, this is what I think occurred:

The exposure on the shirt collar, and the centre of the wall behind is very hot, - the collar being blown completely. In RAW, I can see a lot of adjustments that were targeted at reducing the brightest areas, highlights are way down, white is way down, etc. This has the effect of concentrating colour to the extent it becomes oversaturated.

The mod has reversed the adjustments, and I accepted the fact that some highlights are a little blown, not a big deal.

Its cropped, and also has some height added also.


Take a look and see what you think. Its not desaturated, - though I did set vibrance to zero.


regards


Willie
16/06/2015 - 1:53 PM

One flew over..

One flew over..Terrific shot.

Not an awful lot to suggest.

With the original, instead of Gaussian blur, try a lens blur, - it will avoid that hint of soft double images in some of the birds.

Mod1 has a slight downward bend in the left side of the curves line, just to get black = black. Its very small, but does make a difference.

Mod2 is a 10 X 8 portrait just for the hell of it.

I would slightly warm the wb in the RAW file.


Well done

regards



Willie
12/06/2015 - 1:04 PM

Mexican Daisy

Mexican DaisyThis is very nice. You have been doing very well with flower macros from what I see.

I would not use that colour for the border, - thats just me. The pastel does go well with the image, which is a negative for me as it can dilute the image. Better with black I think, - like the jeweler displaying a diamond.

But an excellent flower macro.


W
11/06/2015 - 5:03 PM

Freyja

FreyjaHi Elaine,

This is certainly one to benefit greatly with some work on the RAW file, - great that you have it. That fill flash has provided wonderful catchights in her eyes.

I have outlined RAW file adjustments that you should do as written to get a result similar to my mod. Working on the RAW file is the way to approach this

White balance warmer, - set to auto, or daylight, or in ACR, set to +15 and -9. At least endure that the temp is above 5500K. Thats why the WB adjustment is the first adjustment you see in the workflow, - it affects every other adjustment.

Exposure set to +1.2

Highlights to -4

Shadows to +13

Blacks to -22

Saturation to -10.

Then open as TIFF or jpeg and apply finishing touches.

What Ive done after RAW is crop to a 5 X 7; slightly brighten the face ONLY )layer and mask, or if in LR, use the adjustment brush on her face alone at +0.25)

Darken the sign only, - dont paint over it now.

Sample the darkest red in the sign, and then paint that over the lettering and advertising in the sign, leaving the wooden borders and the pigeon.

If its not dark enough, then darken the now painted sign only some more,

Sharpen her face a little.

I hope you like the result! If you need any assistance or have questions about this approach, just lte me know.


Regards


Willie
10/06/2015 - 7:07 PM

Got It!

Got It!This is an excellent shot. Great mid air action, well focused, and even the white balance is good Wink Taking advanmtage of the cropped wings to crop closer is a very good idea, makes it look as intended.

Its sharp, and perhaps a tad too sharp on my screen, but its minor.

I would use the burn tool just lighly behind the neck where its brightest, theres good detail in there.

In the mod, Ive cropped a bit off the right, brightened the background, slight burn on the neck, and a little less sharp.


really well done.


Regards


Willie
08/06/2015 - 9:53 PM

Curves

CurvesHi Anita, and welcome to EPZ.


Youve been here a couple of months now, so you know what the critique gallery is about.

This image is very underexposed, with a hint of curves. I think its a building? What I see and you see can be a a little different, unless you use a calibrated monitor, and especially if you use a tablet or laptop.

Its almost abstract really, as theres some ambiguity about what it is, so I can see some attraction in that sense.

When I try to brighten it, it doesnt really do well due to heavy ISO noise, so an aggressive noise reduction, which softens it, combined with some contrast could work.


Ive uploaded 3 version done this way, scroll up, click the modifications tab to view.


Enjoy the site.


W
06/06/2015 - 9:51 PM

no title

no titleExcellent shot mallal.


It can look better if thw white balance is corrected to reflect what an early morning colour temp would be; its currently 4800K as shot, so a little warmer allows the golden light of the time of day to show.


Ive don thti in the mod, which also has a very tiny rotation to get the reflected feathers directly below the main feathers so its level.

Very well done, If this was uploaded in the general gallery, Im sure it would pick up some awards.


Regards



Willie
03/06/2015 - 1:51 PM

Model in red.

Model in red.Hi Wimpy.

You have all you need here to take a good model image.

On my monitor, the overall image seems a bit soft, especially her face. I assume you know about sharpening before you upload by now, so perhaps the large original is also a little soft?

You used shutter priority, which would not be most photographers choice for this situation. Its aperture, as Moira suggested thats most important in a studio like setting, where you have control over the light. Even if you still selected f/2.8, use Aperture, or Manual. Then its you that decides the depth, not the camera.

Did you decide on -2/3 after you took some shots with no negative compensation? If not, why did you decide on -2/3?

The Canon uses TTL2 flash control, assuming you are using Canon speed-lights? Look at the front edge of the table top. Its reflecting a lot of light back to the camera, and may affect exposure, causing the flash power to drop. It appears underexposed, and this in addition to the -2/3 could be the problem. You would probably need to re position at least one flash to avoid the reflection, or, dont use -2/3. Theres a very bright area on her chest, her left side, that indicates too much light concentrated in one spot, - be careful to diffuse the light, perhaps even more.

Its very important that you use a single focus point, and not multiple focus points for this shot, and place the focus point on her eye nearest the camera. I wounder did you do this?

I think that you are improving at this type of shot, - so take the feedback into account, take your time, and take control over aperture. F/4 or 5.6 would be better here. To control the light, move the flashes closer, or further away. Try setting one flash to half the power of the other, Experiment.

The mod is sharper, cropped a little. Colour tone is a lot less red, and sharpening applied.



Regards



Willie
Hot Summer Evening, Berthong RoadWelcome from me too Bob, enjoy the site.

Nice shot and lovely scene, - the road winding off into the distance does trigger the instinct to travel.

Its overall slightly soft here (sharpened a bit in my mod), and that may well be due to how you resize for the site. Assuming you are resizing yourself, the process to ensure you dont lose sharpness is: resize to 1000 pixels long side; save-as, using a unique file name, and at MAXIMUM quality, - largest possible file size, the ppi doesnt matter; then open the new file, check and adjust sharpness, save, and upload.


Regards


Willie
31/05/2015 - 6:25 PM

Lost in the Infinity

Lost in the InfinityYou have some very nice shots in your PF, including one of this model shot on the same day thats really first class.

So, you know what youre doing, and I guess your looking for feedback on the concept more than on any technical aspect.

I think she is too small in the large area also, but since the off-centre crops are done, I tried something that keeps here right where she is, but makes her appear larger. For me, square works with central in many cases.

If we could see this full size and at the resolution it was shot at, I think it would have a great deal more impact.

I also brightened the lower area, warmed it a little.


Regards


Willie
31/05/2015 - 3:37 PM

Mont Tremblant

Mont TremblantWelcome to EPZ Ali. This is the critique gallery area, where we do our best tp provide constructive feedback to help you improve your overall skill with camera knowledge, image composition, and post processing.


This is for me an unusual image from Mont Tremblanc. Im used to seeing ski images, rarely something like this. It is a beautiful area, with lots of opportunities for good photography.

My first impression is that I like it overall. The composition works quite well, even without that focal point Paul mentions.

Then I notice its very high contrast and a little harsh. This may well be a style you want, however it gives the impression that the image has had a lot of post processing done to it.

Youve used a Program mode that has selected f/8, and at 200mm, this provides a relatively shallow depth of field, so you could use a smaller aperture for increased depth.

Since theres quite a bit of processing, I am limited to some extent in how I can modify the appearance to be less contrasty, but I did upload 2 mods.

The second one is intended to be somewhat like an impressionist painting of the scene.

Scroll up, click the modifications tabe to view.


Enjoy the site,


Regards



Willie