Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
this was taken at hunstanton just as the sut was going down , i used 3 exposers ,
These are modifications uploaded by other members of the photo above. Download the photo by right clicking Download Photo and clicking Save As.
You had very attractive light here - not the cliché sunset or long dark shadows, but mellow, hazy, gentle. The interest is in the foreground, the ripple lines and textures. I like the high horizon and just enough sky to balance the proportions.
Two points that I shall address in a Mod - there's a hint of a dip in the horizon which I'm surprised at, it can easily be corrected; and there are various odd little dark blobs, in the sky and the sea. I think that those on the right are wind-surfers but they are not clear enough to be a recognisable feature so I don't think that they add anything.I shall also try adding just a bit of brightness and contrast, for a better sense of luminosity in the sky. But not a big change there.
I will also try passing the burn tool, set to shadows, about 3% exposure, large brush size, over those sand textures. It has the effect of bringing a foreground foreward, making it more real, more tactile. Again it needs to be done discreetly.
I like this a lot and see 2 completely separate pictures here. The first is as you have presented it (with Moira's adjustments). And the second, which I think stands as an image in its own right, is the square at the bottom of the picture, cropping at the top of the first block. The light is lovely there and really picks up the patterns in the sand.
I'm a little confused by the exif data, 28 - 135 mm lens but the focal length is showing as 10mm. If it is 10mm could that account for the dip in the horizon that Moira talks about? Whee I use my 10 - 20mm lens that wide I sometimes have to straighten the horizon on my shots.
Further to Anne's comment - I managed to mangle a chunk of my comment and leave a chunk out, I was puzzled at the Exif data regarding focal lengths... My surprise here was because with wide angle I would expect to see a bit of barrel distortion, not pin-cushion as here - though it is very easy to convert one to the other when adjusting subsequently!!
Very nice use of the groynes as a lead-in, Brian, an extremely attractive sky, and nice traces of footprints in the sand.
However, I first saw this for the interest at the bottom, the pool of water, patterns in the sand, and golden tones. As Anne says, "the light is lovely there and really picks up the patterns".
So I have done a modification in a square format, with just those elements in the frame. I did some tweaking with highlights, shadows, levels and sharpening to enhance the patterns and colours, then cloned out a few bits and pieces at the frame edges so that all attention is focused on the pool and patterns.
It’s a good idea to assign the sRGB colour profile to your images for the web, otherwise viewers won't be seeing the same colours as you do.
For me, the picture is the foreground. I would have concentrated in the first place on the bottom half of the image. The water and sand is pin sharp and extremely well shown. You can get rid of the rest to advantage. Not sure why you needed HDR.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
1st March 2015 - 31st March 2015
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View March's Photo Month Calendar