Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
This image was taken with a purpose in mind – a large white wall in a very minimalist almost clinical environment. I wanted to create a tranquil, sombre mood with a space less feel. Printed (white mount, white frame), I feel that I achieved my aim but I would appreciate any feedback.
Please also, if you have time, take a look at some other images on my facebook page https://www.facebook.com/chrisweedonphotography
| Brand: | Canon |
| Camera: | Canon EOS 1D X |
| Lens: | Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZE |
| Recording media: | RAW (digital) |
| Date Taken: | 23 Dec 2012 - 3:44 PM |
| Focal Length: | 21mm |
| Lens Max Aperture: | f/2.8 |
| Aperture: | f/10.0 |
| Shutter Speed: | 0.4sec |
| Exposure Comp: | 0.0 |
| ISO: | 100 |
| Exposure Mode: | Manual |
| Metering Mode: | Multi-segment |
| Flash: | Off, Did not fire |
| White Balance: | As Shot |
| Title: | Tranquillity |
| Username: | |
| Uploaded: | 21 Feb 2013 - 8:53 AM |
| Tags: | Architecture, Black & white, Digital art, General, Landscape / travel, Specialist / abstract |
| VS Mode Rating |
107 (72% won) These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon. Signup to e2Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode |
| Votes: | Voting Disabled |
![]() | Critique Wanted |
| Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification) |
Comments
Nice image, would increase the contrast just a touch as I can just see the horizon on the left hand side of the image. Would have shot it with a smaller aperture and slightly longer exposure as well to get rid of any detail in the water.
Nice composition though.
Dave
Hi Valveman, I just use the watermark for web use to protect the image. Should I make it smaller or remove it completely? What are the views on using watermarks?
Quote: What are the views on using watermarks?
The choice is yours.
Some people hate them, others don't mind.
They offer a very limited amount of protection, most people here could remove yours, for example, in seconds but it might put off an opportunist.
What matters here for me is the total lack of visible horizon - water melts into sky.
I don't like watermarks but appreciate why they are used. But given that it could easily be cloned out here it seems counter-productive on balance.
Moira
Mike43 - ''...for me the best I have seen for a long time.'' Thank you very much!
A very fine simple image. I would not change anything but the logo. I do understand why people use them but it is pointless in this critique section on such small images and I could clone this off in seconds, so it serves no purpose. It does pull the eye, especially on such a delicate image.
To stop people stealing work, watermarks need to be across detail or embedded in the file invisibly.
Paul
I added a gradient to the sky on the mods and changed the composition and formats. The mods are only possibilities from your very good photo. I also removed the watermark. I think they are totally acceptable though as I have had photos stolen. If a person removes them then they know they're stealing and deserve to be sued for breach of copyright.
Alan.
Paintman, I like what you have done with the subtle gradient. It creates a nice balance. Thank you ![]()
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.























