Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

On The Prowl

EvasiveSkydiver > Gallery > On The Prowl

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

Just a random image of my pet cat 'Pumpkin' edited slightly using GIMP,
Just messing about, trying different things. Think i may have gone a bit overboard with the color enhancment.

Brand:Canon
Camera:Canon EOS 350D
Lens:50.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 78.1 mm)
Recording media:RAW (digital)
Date Taken:2 Apr 2012 - 5:41 PM
Focal Length:50mm
Aperture:f/2.0
Shutter Speed:1/125sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:800
Exposure Mode:Shutter speed priority AE
Metering Mode:Evaluative
Flash:Off, Did not fire
Title:On The Prowl
Username:EvasiveSkydiver EvasiveSkydiver
Uploaded:3 Apr 2012 - 11:29 PM
Tags:General, Pets / captive animals, Wildlife / nature
VS Mode Rating 100 (0% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

banehawi
banehawi (Critique Team)
8
521 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2127 Constructive Critique Points
4 Apr 2012 - 12:02 AM
0

I really love the angle youve shot this it, - different and very nice.

Youve done well to get the eyes sharp at f/2 also. You have gone overboard a little with colour, and also, part of this is that theres a colour cast in the original that might be due to auto white balance making a poor decision


I would suggest you crop space from the top, - it makes the shot 99% cat; Ive done this in the mod, and also worked on the colour balance, and removed some noise. I added 2 small catch-lights using a small white brush, - this helps bring the eyes to life.


Its a really good shot, and shows whats possible when you get right down to the level of the subject.



regards


Willie

Last Modified By banehawi at 4 Apr 2012 - 12:02 AM
Constructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique!
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
4 Apr 2012 - 12:22 AM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.


Quote: I really love the angle youve shot this it, - different and very nice.

Youve done well to get the eyes sharp at f/2 also. You have gone overboard a little with colour, and also, part of this is that theres a colour cast in the original that might be due to auto white balance making a poor decision


I would suggest you crop space from the top, - it makes the shot 99% cat; Ive done this in the mod, and also worked on the colour balance, and removed some noise. I added 2 small catch-lights using a small white brush, - this helps bring the eyes to life.


Its a really good shot, and shows whats possible when you get right down to the level of the subject.



regards


Willie

Hi Willie, Thanks for the great advice you've given me, i'll take it onboard and hopefully keep improving with practice.
Thanks again,

Craig

Sooty_1
Sooty_1 (Critique Team)
2
962 forum posts United Kingdom161 Constructive Critique Points
4 Apr 2012 - 8:38 AM
0

I like it too, Willie's done the mod I would have done, but the catchlights are in the wrong place for the light. As with a lot of things, it is the subtle that can make the difference, but it has to look real, otherwise your brain tells you something isn't right (such as replacing skies that are lit differently to the ground, or adding a moon to a picture against the shadows etc).

I would also love to see a pic like this with eye contact, as cats have such an intense look sometimes.

Nick

Constructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique!
Trev_B
Trev_B (e2 Member)
6
35 forum postsTrev_B vcard England54 Constructive Critique Points
4 Apr 2012 - 11:02 AM
0

Hi Craig... Yes like Willie says you have gone overboard with the colour and I like the jaunty angle. I would like to have seen a little more room to the right as the cats whiskers are very slightly cropped.

In my mod I have removed the dark area in the background and added some room to the right of frame, I have also assume that your door frame is white and adjusted the colours to that. It may have increased the blue in the image but hopefully bought back the natural colours to the muggy.

I agree with the catch light so have added a small amount to the eyes.

Trev

Constructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique!


Quote: Hi Craig... Yes like Willie says you have gone overboard with the colour and I like the jaunty angle. I would like to have seen a little more room to the right as the cats whiskers are very slightly cropped.

In my mod I have removed the dark area in the background and added some room to the right of frame, I have also assume that your door frame is white and adjusted the colours to that. It may have increased the blue in the image but hopefully bought back the natural colours to the muggy.

I agree with the catch light so have added a small amount to the eyes.

Trev

Thanks a lot for the advice!!
Love the mod Smile


Quote: I like it too, Willie's done the mod I would have done, but the catchlights are in the wrong place for the light. As with a lot of things, it is the subtle that can make the difference, but it has to look real, otherwise your brain tells you something isn't right (such as replacing skies that are lit differently to the ground, or adding a moon to a picture against the shadows etc).

I would also love to see a pic like this with eye contact, as cats have such an intense look sometimes.

Nick


Quote: I like it too, Willie's done the mod I would have done, but the catchlights are in the wrong place for the light. As with a lot of things, it is the subtle that can make the difference, but it has to look real, otherwise your brain tells you something isn't right (such as replacing skies that are lit differently to the ground, or adding a moon to a picture against the shadows etc).

I would also love to see a pic like this with eye contact, as cats have such an intense look sometimes.

Nick

Thanks a lot for the advice!! Smile

Trev_B
Trev_B (e2 Member)
6
35 forum postsTrev_B vcard England54 Constructive Critique Points
4 Apr 2012 - 11:35 AM
0

Just another thought Craig.. Willie alluded to Auto White balance. I don't know if you use it, however I find using the correct WB for the lighting, set it to sun light, shadow, tungsten... what ever light you are in helps. If it's not quite right then as you are shooting RAW then you can adjust in software.

Best of luck Trev

Last Modified By Trev_B at 4 Apr 2012 - 11:37 AM


Quote: Just another thought Craig.. Willie alluded to Auto White balance. I don't know if you use it, however I find using the correct WB for the lighting, set it to sun light, shadow, tungsten... what ever light you are in helps. If it's not quite right then as you are shooting RAW then you can adjust in software.

Best of luck Trev

Thanks again for the great advice,
Any help I can get is much appreciated. Im quite new to SLR photography and editing software, so I need all the help and advice I can get!
Hopefully I will improve with practice Smile
Thanks again

Craig

mhfore
6
England161 Constructive Critique Points
4 Apr 2012 - 6:14 PM
0

Hi Craig,

I guess i'd better be careful what I say about your image of "Pumpkin", well people and pets you know Wink Grin .
First off I agree with you, you may have been a touch over zealous woth the vibrance or saturation but so what it's what you like that matters. The angle is right for Pumpkin to prowl into and works fine in to my eyes. If you use ACR to process your image then alonr the top left is a white balance eyedropper, click on a section in your imag ethat should be white and it will adjust the colours.

Take care

Martin

Constructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique!


Quote: Hi Craig,

I guess i'd better be careful what I say about your image of "Pumpkin", well people and pets you know Wink Grin .
First off I agree with you, you may have been a touch over zealous woth the vibrance or saturation but so what it's what you like that matters. The angle is right for Pumpkin to prowl into and works fine in to my eyes. If you use ACR to process your image then alonr the top left is a white balance eyedropper, click on a section in your imag ethat should be white and it will adjust the colours.

Take care

Martin

Excellent, thanks for the comments and advice Smile

paulbroad
4 Apr 2012 - 7:10 PM
0

It is a bit too ginger I think. The basic shot and plane of sharpness are good, however, and this is where personal preference comes in - I don't go for the angle because too many lines in the background scream tilted! I would crop in much closer top remove much of the background.

You pays your money......


Paul

Hi Craig,
If you're setting the white balance in your camera via a pre-set to suit the shot you're about to take, you'll get a shot with the white balance adjusted as the camera thinks it should be, which may, or may not, be what you actually want. In other words, you'll want to adjust it later in software.
Also, there's every chance that you'll forget to change the setting the next time you use the camera which could mean that the next images will need fixing.
Alternatively, if you leave the W/B setting in the camera at "auto" it makes no difference to your images at the time of shooting because you're going to have to adjust them in processing anyway.
I use "auto" W/B, in camera, every time.
I do however avoid "auto" anything in processing.

Bren.

Constructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique!


Quote: It is a bit too ginger I think. The basic shot and plane of sharpness are good, however, and this is where personal preference comes in - I don't go for the angle because too many lines in the background scream tilted! I would crop in much closer top remove much of the background.

You pays your money......


Paul

Hi Paul, thanks for the feedback Smile


Quote: Hi Craig,
If you're setting the white balance in your camera via a pre-set to suit the shot you're about to take, you'll get a shot with the white balance adjusted as the camera thinks it should be, which may, or may not, be what you actually want. In other words, you'll want to adjust it later in software.
Also, there's every chance that you'll forget to change the setting the next time you use the camera which could mean that the next images will need fixing.
Alternatively, if you leave the W/B setting in the camera at "auto" it makes no difference to your images at the time of shooting because you're going to have to adjust them in processing anyway.
I use "auto" W/B, in camera, every time.
I do however avoid "auto" anything in processing.

Bren.

Hi Bren, thanks for the advice, I really appreciate it!! Smile

We aim to please Craig!
We weren't all born knowing how to do this and we're each learning from each other all the time.
Sometimes the advice we put out can seem confusing, even conflicting, that's because we each have our favourite methods but by listening, which you obviously are, and more importantly, by trying things, which you obviously are, you'll soon develop your own favoured ways of getting things done.
So!
If you ever have a question, no matter how daft or silly it might seem to you, ask it anyway. The chances are that, not very long ago, we were asking that same daft question!
Good luck!

Bren.


Quote: We aim to please Craig!
We weren't all born knowing how to do this and we're each learning from each other all the time.
Sometimes the advice we put out can seem confusing, even conflicting, that's because we each have our favourite methods but by listening, which you obviously are, and more importantly, by trying things, which you obviously are, you'll soon develop your own favoured ways of getting things done.
So!
If you ever have a question, no matter how daft or silly it might seem to you, ask it anyway. The chances are that, not very long ago, we were asking that same daft question!
Good luck!

Bren.

Cheers Bren!! Smile

paulbroad
5 Apr 2012 - 8:04 AM
0

Reading back, many people should consider Bren's comment on WB and auto, which is spot on. Auto WB is correct, or nearly so, 99% of the time and can be easily adjusted later, but any kind of auto processing in software is quite likely to be wrong.

Paul

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.