New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
This is a first good attempt at portraits but the white fade in totally spoils it for me. You also have a little red eye as previous mentioned. This can be remedied at the time of the shot by using off camera flash or in PS. Unless you are using umbrellas in a pro photo studio it is also too harsh. Try using reflectors - a gold reflector would cast a warm light onto the face. Also Personally I would never use landscape format for a head and shoulders portrait as it leaves too much space at either side which is why the white fade is probably so over powering and distracts from the image. I would like to see the original shot. Also if you use the modification option people can show rather tell you what they mean.
Love the contrast between the tones of the bird and the White snowy branches. As suggested the contrast, saturation adjustments would bring out the bird a little more but you would lose the softness -depends what you went for. One other thing to try and Im not saying it would be better is a slightly tighter crop to focus the attention on the pigeon a little more.
Love the angle but you need to include the whole face including the ears. You could take the same shot including all the face and the front paws sacrificing some of the body which would give much more drama and impact. You also have a little glare from the window in the bg so make sure you take this into account when composing your shot which I realise is not easy when working with animals. on a positive note love the pose, colour and detail (the eyes are sharp which is important in a portrait).
Simply a beautiful shot. I love the contrast in colour between the Autumn leaves and the mossy rocks and the way you have composed this and used a long enough shutter speed so that there is just a hint of the water. I also like the comp but wonder what it would look like in a more letter box format with the water running right across the diagonal. That is not a critism but a thought.
This is a nice idea but one thing that I would suggest is to clone out the tree branches on the right hand side. An abstract should be something without being anything - if you know what I mean, not sure I know entirely - but the out of focus leaves add too much realism.
I like the effect as it gives the flower a look of luxury velvet however I feel the composition and the isolation of the flower is a little off. Firstly the composition - the image would have looked more balance if the distance from the centre of the petals was the same to the left and to the bottom ie the petals coming together towards the bottom left I would have put right in the corner. The isolation of the flower to make the very dark bg I think has been done too precisely. I use the magic wand tool in PS to isolate the bg but then feather, (5 pixels), the marching ants before taking the bg brightness right down. This will give a less severe edge and make it look more natural.
Hi Mary
Like this very much for a number of reasons. Firstly the DOF is spot on and goes very well with the different textures of the feather ie the more fluffy stuff is in the softer focus. love the composition also - love the way it curves into the frame and as it happens into focus. lastly but not at all the least I love those sheen like rainbow colours.
A nice shot and I liked the other version but I'm gonna be brave and say that the angle of the flower stem to the vase looks awkward. Dont know how you would get around this as I know the flowers hang from a horizontal branch. Maybe a vertical piece of the plant and not just the flowering bit could be included, or a different vase used (something that is longer than it is tall) or the vase could be presented at an angle to the vertical. Its a difficult one.
I think this has a lot of potential - nice low angle with good colour in the fg and the church in the bg. However this looks like it could be a HDR image, (if not it is overworked), and nothing is quite in focus - the church needs to be pinsharp. Also as suggested by Gary the verticals are not vertical which can be remedied in PS using the transform tool and will greatly improve the image. Also the flower pots take something away from the rest of the flowers and I appreciate that you cant go moving stuff - which would be a lack of respect - but you could thnk a little more about your composition and position when taking the shot as to not include them.
Now that is a daffodil photo - they are such a difficult flower to photograph in an interesting way but this has done just that. The daffs you have made almost just an accent to the image which works very well. The only thing I would say is as above it needed more flowers which can be done as above or cloned in PS.
Hope you dont mind me saying this as its meant in good spirit - this is all wrong for a macro. A macro no matter how close has to have a single point/area of absolute sharpness - in flowers this is usually the stamens when you are so close that yu have a very narrow DOF. For best results you also have to use a tripod to keep things rock steady as the slightest movement is magnified even down to using a remote infrared shutter release so you dont have to touch the camera onece the shot is set up. Use Single point focusing or manual. when using single point AF make sure the camera focuses on the part you want.
I like the spray of dirt from the rear in this shot - looks very dramatic. Just one little thing - try giving the cars a little more space to drive into as it were - it will give a little more sense of drama and stop the car being so central in the image which should add even more drama to your shots.