Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Photo for critique, practising Macro. I am an amateur photographer with huge ambition to have a photo in an exhibition.I enjoy Macro photography as it is another world close up.
| Brand: | Canon |
| Camera: | Canon EOS 1000D |
| Lens: | 18-55mm , macro extension lens |
| Recording media: | JPEG (digital) |
| Date Taken: | 24 Apr 2012 - 11:03 AM |
| Focal Length: | 55mm |
| Aperture: | f/7.1 |
| Shutter Speed: | 1/100sec |
| Exposure Comp: | 0.0 |
| ISO: | 200 |
| Exposure Mode: | Not Defined |
| Metering Mode: | Multi-segment |
| Flash: | Off, Did not fire |
| Title: | Summer Flower |
| Username: | |
| Uploaded: | 20 Jun 2012 - 9:03 AM |
| Tags: | Close-up / macro, Flowers, Macro |
| VS Mode Rating |
101 (100% won) These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon. Signup to e2Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode |
| Votes: | Voting Disabled |
![]() | Critique Wanted |
| Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification) |
Comments
Nice shot, let down a little for me by the brightness of the petals and the small bit of leaf (?) at 7 o'clock.
You can also see some chromatic aberration on the edges of the petals.
Good off-centre composition, and plenty of detail, just a bit overexposed. It is easier to recover detail from shadows than it is to recover blown highlights. I'd do the same again, but dial in between -1 and -2 stops exposure compensation. It would help make the CA less obvious too.
Nick
It depends if you are after a record of the bloom or a pictorial effect - the image is quite strong pictorially but is quite over exposed i you want record. You say macro extension lens - do you mean tubes behind the zoom or a close up filter screwed into the lens front? It matters.
You will get better quality with extension tubes than screw in lenses, but your 18/55 is not the ideal lens for macro - no zoom is. If you are really keen on macro you will need a fixed focus lens on tubes, or better still, a dedicated macro lens. If you decide to invest, look at 90 to 105 mm at least - you are too close physically with a 50mm. !50mm is even better but they do cost a lot.
Make sure you get one that does 1:1 - full size. In this image I would have given less exposure and kept the of centre composition, but with the bias to the top right third. The sharpness is actually quite good but there is a vicious circle in macro - depth of field - aperture and exposure. You need depth of field usually, so a small aperture but then there is not enough light for hand holding. Use a tripod for all static subjects, but for things that move - insects - you need to ramp up the ISO - so down goes the quality. Flash becomes imperative.
Paul
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.















