Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

keithh

Connect to User

loading

All Change

keithh > keithh Blog > All Change
04/10/2010 - 10:32 AM



Unique views 755 (6720)

There is little doubt that Professional Photography, as people have come to
define or imagine it, has changed and that change has been rapid. It’s not that we don’t want or need photography, it is simply that the way it is used, created and accessed has evolved to such an extent that the industry cannot support those within it in the same way that it once did.

The evolution of photography has only just begun and it will alter in more ways than it has already and probably in ways that we cannot imagine or prepare for. The speed at which developments in the internet and imaging technology have moved means that photographers have to change faster than they ever did and compete in a much wider and even global market. Whilst it is a market that is shrinking, it demands much more from photographers than photographs. Photographer and Graphic Designer. Photographer and Web Designer. Photographer and Teacher. Photographer and Artworker. Photographer and Publisher. Photographer and Marketing Executive.

All of the above are real people describing themselves. Less than ten years ago you’d have been lucky to have found anyone who considered themselves a photographer plus one of the above in any real sense. It is now often the case that simply being a photographer is not enough.

IT Consultant and Photographer. Nurse and Photographer. Hotel Receptionist and Photographer. Taxi Driver and Photographer. Farmer and Photographer. These are also real people who consider photography to be their second job.
They have all got websites and they are all competing with their full time professional counterparts for a large slice of the market. The trouble is that often they will be happy for their slice to come at a cheaper price. This is the point where the professional photographer starts shouting about amateurs being less skilled and that they are undercutting without the same overheads or earning expectations. The latter may well be true but the former will not always be the case – photography is not rocket science or some secretive black magic, it is simply maths mixed with a bit of art and common
sense. No reason why Farmer Fred Blogs shouldn’t be as good as Photographer Quentin de Flugel (Don’t Google him, I made him up). One point not often addressed by those same photographers who have a second string to their bow, is how the Graphic Designer, Artworker or Web Designer view them.

Does, for instance, the Photographer charge the same market rate for his or her art work that they do for their photography, or is it simply a useful marketing tool to add to their business that they can undercut others on?
I recently quoted for a wedding and knew before I even gave it that it would not be taken up. The couple finally went for an amateur photographer who was going to charge them £200. Was this lost business to me? Well, no, because I was never going to get it in the first place. Had the couple not found a ‘photographer’ for £200, they would have asked a relative with a decent camera to do the honours – they never had the money in the first place. Will the photographs be any good? They might be - I know that in this case they will not – but they might have been and the couple won’t have been interested in insurance, back up equipment and experience, they just wanted a few photographs of their wedding day to stick in album from Boots the Chemist.

Same goes for the yoghurt company who want some photographs of their products for their website. It’s a pot of yoghurt. You can pose it in as many ways as you like – but it’s a pot of yoghurt and there are thousands of people who could take a decent photograph of a pot of yoghurt. Is the company going to pay £500 a day for a professional photographer to do the job or are they going to listen to the friend of a friend who can do it for a £150? As a professional photographer you have to ask if you want to sit on your backside for the day, or do you accept that money yourself and knock out photos of dairy products for the day?

A couple of years ago, I quoted a national company with a name known to everybody, for a job that encompassed new print, web and billboard advertising. I was informed that it would be a major campaign. I didn’t get the job – it went in the end to a friend of a friend who did some wedding photography and could muster up some free models and use his house as one of the locations – that particular location had been very specifically described in the brief. I did keep an eye out for the campaign but it never appeared. The point is that this particular company would never have gone down this route for their photography at one time.

It’s not just the lower to mid end of the market either. There used to be a time when Car Photography cost the earth. That’s not necessarily the case now. Fact is that there are scores of companies out there who need a job done on a tight budget and are willing to think outside of the old box to get it done. They employ young people who do not know the old ways, they only know the here and now, they think differently and are more than happy to utilise the internet and their virtual networks to achieve it. Photographers who sit in the old boxes waiting for the knock will be waiting for a long time to come – it’s a changing world and professional photographers will have to change with it to stay with it.

This changing world isn’t only confined to commercial or portrait and wedding
photography. The world of Landscape/Fine Art Photography (hard to define in a few words but you know the genre and area I’m talking about), once the domain of large and medium format cameras is changing because the buying public don’t give a monkey’s.

Ask yourself where most of the house owners of the UK buy pieces of ‘art’ for their wall? The Range? Ikea? Dunelm? All of these places and more just like them. Why go to the bother of producing a photograph on a large format
camera to have it poorly printed on a bit of cheap pseudo-canvas to sell for £20 in The Range? How much does a Phase One Digital Camera cost? Yes, the files are beautifully detailed, the colours and contrast are superb and the overall quality is sublime – but then you whack it on a bit of cheap paper and put it in a black plastic frame called the Osterglumbo or some other unfathomable name and charge ten quid.

When I talk to gallery owners, all I hear is how depressed the market is. Even when framing a photograph, the largest percentage of buyers will head off to the racks of affordable ready made frames rather than have a bespoke one
made by their local framer or gallery owner. Sure there’s a market up there in the high echelons but how many photographers can it support when there are far too may photographers in the slush pile beneath it? It’s a sure thing that the upper stratosphere above it has become thinner at the same time. One local gallery recently rang me and said that they could do with a few local village scenes, about 7x5, that they could frame and knock out to the tourists for about £3. It doesn’t take a mathematician to see what is in this for the photographer.

I was prompted to write this blog following a visit to a high school sixth form. They were sending would be photographers off to college and university with some misplaced idealistic view of a world 15 years out of date. A world in which half the class were going to become ‘Art Photographers’ and the rest would be Travel Photographers and be paid huge sums of money to circumnavigate the globe with their camera. They also had pupils interested in Commercial Photography using curriculum time to learn darkroom techniques. It’s great fun but it’s something that needs to be done out of school hours
because why would they need it?

New photographers need to be on Facebook, Myspace, Twitter and the like, networking, linking, posting and building traffic to their own website. They need a You Tube account with a few home made virals on there. They have to have a Flickr stream and attract the euphoric homilies of thousands of other Flickry photographers and hope that somewhere, someone is watching and thinking that here is the next great thing. The replacement for the ‘butterfly on my shoulder’ generation with their own fresh angle on an old theme.

But most of all, they will need to diversify. It’s been a buzz word for a long time now in many industries and it will become one in the world of photography. So with that in mind, we should all stop bemoaning and belittling
the Farmer, Taxi Driver and Hotel Receptionist who are also diversifying and adding Photographer to their CV. We are lucky, or unlucky depending on which side of the fence you stand on, to be involved in an industry that has more hobbyist devotees than it does professionals. Your average GP doesn’t have to compete with Bob the Builder who prescribes a few painkillers after work, your average Photographer does and these days even more so.

Maybe that’s how it should be, after all, photography was invented by amateurs.

Another worrying aspect for many photographers, who base their business in Stock Photography, is that although the internet demands photography and graphics on a huge scale, it does not pay in the same way. Factor in the huge numbers of photographers who now contribute to image libraries and then couple that with the ever increasing availability of cheap and even free images and you have a whole section of the industry which will probably within a few years be provided almost totally by the amateur market – certainly the web supply side of it. Each of the images used in this article (obviously not here on EPZ) cost me nothing to use and legally so. I am allowed to use them commercially and to alter them to suit my needs. All that I am asked is not to use them as stand alone products. Another website simply required that I provided a link back to the photographers portfolio – even the library admit that this link can be anywhere on my web site, it does not have to be on this page. Had I wanted to do away with that link the images would have cost me $5 each and if I wanted to use them commercially in print, $10.00.

Quite simply there are more people trying to earn a living from photography and less money in the kitty to pay for it. Cameras have become more capable and more open to everybody and backed up by the safety net of Photoshop.
They will get more intelligent, produce better results with minimum input from
the user. Software will follow suite.

I can honestly see a day when the idea of being a Professional Photographer will cause people to raise their eyebrows in astonishment. A little like someone telling you today that they are a Gong Farmer or a Knocker-Up… who needs them?

Either that or they will fall over in shock when you tell them that you are not a wedding photographer.

Comments

JJGEE
JJGEE  96339 forum posts England18 Constructive Critique Points
4 Oct 2010 - 10:30 PM

An interesting read.


Quote: I recently quoted for a wedding and knew before I even gave it that it would not be taken up.

But why bother if you were convinced of it not being taken up.
Surely it is better to sometimes say no ?

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links 
5 Oct 2010 - 5:40 AM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

keithh
keithh e2 Member 1023173 forum postskeithh vcard Wallis and Futuna33 Constructive Critique Points
5 Oct 2010 - 5:40 AM

Because a quote takes minutes and costs nothing

keithh
keithh e2 Member 1023173 forum postskeithh vcard Wallis and Futuna33 Constructive Critique Points
27 Apr 2011 - 7:41 AM


Quote: I think to be replaced entirely by amateurs with the more skilled of the amateurs making enough to cover their equipment costs.

and then as they get more work they'll decide to go full time and we'll see the rebirth of the Professional.
Wink

KevSB
KevSB  101410 forum posts United Kingdom5 Constructive Critique Points
31 Jan 2012 - 11:17 AM

Enjoyed reading this and so true

Ade_Osman
Ade_Osman e2 Member 114521 forum postsAde_Osman vcard England36 Constructive Critique Points
31 Jan 2012 - 11:31 AM

Makes complete sense even from an amateurs stance......I certainly don't envy folk trying to make a living from the business, but then again I would never have the gall to call myself a pro, unlike many others....

Ade

BillyGoatGruff
BillyGoatGruff e2 Member 7191 forum postsBillyGoatGruff vcard England199 Constructive Critique Points
31 Jan 2012 - 12:05 PM

Brilliant article, Keith. Especially in today's world.
As I suspected, you really do know everything! Wink

Like a great many people, I'm sure, I once entertained the notion of being a pro and have even scratched the surface of that particular minefield, albeit in an infinitessimal way, and can only support everything you have just written. David Noton has also written a similarly cogent piece on the notion of being "a pro," and both his and your thoughts remind me of a particularly appropriate notion relayed to me by a old art tutor of mine (himself a very successful portrait painter) which was that to succeed in Art (whether it be painting or photography or anything else) one must be tenacious first and foremost. Something which must inevitably become more and more difficult with the multitudinous means by which imaging is now possible and the consequent "dumbing down" not only of the potential image-makers but also of expectations of the audience and their willingness to pay for quality. Indeed, with the current digital explosion that Chris mentioned above, the notion of what actually constitutes quality is also called into question in my own humble opinion!

A couple of questions I have often asked myself when I feel the need to "get real" are:

Do I really want to make a living at this, with all its attendant pressure of constantly chasing work, actually keeping myself alive, feeding my family and keeping a roof over my head.....or, do I retain the luxury of honing my own skills and notions of "quality" without that kind of pressure?
Do I want to turn something I love to do into something I must do to earn a crust...i.e a job?

Asking myself this tends to help keep things in some sort of perspective, I reckon.
When I don't have to make an image, making an image remains a joy and if I sell a print, well, it's a nice bonus!

I take my hat off to people like your good self who are able to continue to earn a living from being a pro-photographer in an increasingly unappreciative world....Smile

hoopsa
hoopsa  6 United Kingdom
9 Mar 2012 - 10:43 AM

There are obviously a few fortunate individuals who are able to take photographs and make a good living from just that, and are treated with the respect of those employing them, but these are few and far between. Many well known photographers seem to have gone down the route of workshops for the keen amateur as either a supplement to their income or their main income, as well as doing paid presentations. I once romanced about going professional and went on a few courses with professionals to perfect my skills in specialist areas. It was enlightening and put me off. Key things learnt:
1) The amount of money likely to be paid is not significant especially when you take into consideration travelling and post production time, and any pre and after photographing meetings. When you work out the per hourly rate it is not that much. And if you are lucky, there will be tax to pay!
2)You need to factor in all the time when you will not be working. You still have mouths to feed and bills to pay. That is a lot of pressure, especially those who are not single.
3) You cannot realistically turn down work. That means that you are likely to be doing work that you do not enjoy and probably accepting quantities of work and schedules that you would rather not. Feast or famine come to mind. Can any photographer realistically turn down work because it means an early start and late finish and it will be the 4th day that they have been on the road away from home working in the wet.
4) The weather may mean a cancellation of a job (and at best a reduced fee, and at worst no fee).
5) Little time available for the photography that you enjoy yourself.
6) Little income available to buy the latest and better photographic equipment because the income is needed to pay bills (see 1) above)
7) The total lack of respect that seems to be paid to many photographers particularly in the fashion / glamour area

The opportunity to make money is there from doing event photography where someone wants a half decent photograph on the spot and will pay a premium for it or from doing family events (weddings, christenings, birthdays, engagements etc.) at a low flat fee with minimum post production work. It's a lot of work and does not "rock my boat" That is not why I got into photography.

For those who do make a living exclusively from photography, I take my hat off to you. It is a tough world.

I carry on doing my day job. This gives me an income that is not a fortune but is still one that many photographers would dream of having and lets me buy equipment that many photographers could not realistically afford to buy from their income from photography alone.
I take the type of creative photos that interest me in my spare time and do not spend most of my time taking non creative photographs that I know will provide an income.
One day I will retire and hopefully have the skills, equipment, time and money to travel the world. If I sell any of the photos that I take, that will be a bonus

cuffit
cuffit  7180 forum posts England2 Constructive Critique Points
22 Mar 2012 - 7:43 PM

Hi Keith, enjoyed your article. It is some years since I attended one of your photography weekends and while I don't see as many of your photos on Ephotozine these days, I reckon I could still spot a shot of yours among the masses: faultless composition; great light and stand-out subjects. Your shot of the Red Arrows still remains one of the very best I have seen. To me, this talent is what sets you apart from the majority of photographers, amateur or otherwise and why you remain a professional. But photography is going the way of painting. At a military college I know, each top man was remembered by a painted portrait but with the introduction of photography, a photograph was considered better and, at that time, much more expensive; the deputy was given the cheaper painted option. Up until the mid-2000s, the top men were photographed but they railed at the more expensive and prestigious paintings of the deputy - the deputy is now photographed; the top man has the prestige and the painter commands the money!

The advent of digital and the reduction in price and types of camera have indeed made photography available to all, along with the associated technologies and skills you outlline. So, an expensive camera is not a barrier to entry as far as taking photos is concerned, but there are still barriers to 'access'. For example. access to the inside track at motorsports venues is restricted (no less safe than the outside). Other sporting venues now see anyone with an SLR as a 'professional' and rock concerts go to great lengths to explain that there is a professional photographer on the tour and and all photography is therefore forbidden - cue mobiles and some ace compacts but who will be able to compete with a professional in that arena if selling pictures is their objective. Clearly, amateurs in some arenas (sic) will be able to compete - landscapes for example. You mention weddings. I would not want to compromise the quality of photos and, while accepting that talent doesn't come cheap, the cost of a photograper is fearsome and, therefore, many (perhaps a lot) are going to try and get it done some other way.

While millions take many more pictures than ever before and some subjects are likely to undermine certain subject areas of the photography profession, the good photographers will move in different directions, just as you have done, because that ability to capture a photo in a way that many will not do even with years of trying will still set good photographers apart - whether professional or amateur. If the two categories of photographer compete and can produce the same quality, then price will be the arbiter. If all barriers to access were removed and picture editors or companies could choose from pros and competent amateurs, then perhaps photography as a profession would be in terminal decline as a money-making pursuit. But I wonder if interest by the photographers would also then decline, spending all that time and effort for no return. Just as the artist has made a comeback at that military college, so surely would the trusted photographer - or whatever technology driven substiute appears - return.

Chris

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.