Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
There was a bit of a discussion last night - Version 1 versus version 2. It was split exactly along the right handed versus the left handed - I would be interested to see if it follows suit.
When I viewed this on the back of the camera I nearly deleted it, however with a little bit of work I think its OK - its certainly how I previsualised the shot - not one for the purists, converging verticles and the like.
EDIT: When previewed the border looked great - after upload looks to be skewed (could be this monitor...goes away to check on laptop)
Big thanks to Jackofalltrades for the Guest editors award on the last image ![]()
| Recording media: | RAW (digital) |
| Title: | Reach for the skies |
| Username: | |
| Uploaded: | 28 Oct 2011 - 8:37 AM |
| Tags: | Architecture, Black & white, Magicianssquare |
| Votes: | 38 |
![]() | Variant - Tests |
Comments
Cheers Richard.
Re the border issue mentioned in the description, on the laptop it looks as it should, I wonder if its down to the screen resolution on the main computer (I've seen it before on images).
V2 works better for me as well Nick. Excellent work.
Derek
Excellent viewpoint and composition, Nick, definitely suits mono. After much toggling between the two, think V1's my fave ![]()
Trev ![]()
Liking this a lot Nick but perhaps a little restrained.
It would work well with a steely curved duotone going on , that hint of blue is a little to subtle for effect.
Its asking for more dynamic contrast (not that its flat) and (without the exif) either a slightly shorter shutter or a tad less motion/Gaussian blur for the clouds to work.
Just a thought ![]()

Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.























