Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Camden.

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

Taken on a stroll from Camden Lock.

Another point and shoot, no RAW file, just jpeg.

Not the best but, again, I like it.

Nige.

Brand:Canon
Camera:Canon EOS 700D
Lens:18.0 - 250.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 28.5 - 396.1 mm)
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:7 Jul 2013 - 12:20 PM
Focal Length:61mm
Aperture:f/5.6
Shutter Speed:1/100sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:100
Exposure Mode:Program AE
Metering Mode:Partial
Flash:Off, Did not fire
White Balance:Daylight
Title:Camden.
Username:Nigwel Nigwel
Uploaded:23 Mar 2014 - 12:03 AM
Tags:Architecture, Wildlife / nature
VS Mode Rating 102 (62.5% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
Digby
Digby e2 Member 541 forum postsDigby vcard Wales
23 Mar 2014 - 12:12 AM

Nice image.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  681 forum posts United Kingdom843 Constructive Critique Points
23 Mar 2014 - 8:14 AM

Nice, but just needs a bit of finishing off. Clone out the very bright spot bottom right, then burn in the cyclists and scene through the arch a bit. Both slightly over exposed. Just inspect and correct the detail.

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  681 forum posts United Kingdom843 Constructive Critique Points
23 Mar 2014 - 8:59 AM

Just read the comments on your previous image. You advocate no post processing and just viewing the image out of the camera. If that is the way you want to go, that's your decision, but, if so, you need to get it right in camera. Here you should have exposed for the scene through the bridge. Then the exposure would be correct out of the camera.

If you want to follow your route, you must master camera technique. And the camera will still get it wrong on occasion, it is an imperfect tool.


Paul

Last Modified By paulbroad at 23 Mar 2014 - 9:00 AM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Coast
Coast Critique Team 6804 forum postsCoast vcard United Kingdom290 Constructive Critique Points
23 Mar 2014 - 9:27 AM

Paul is absolutely right - if you do not like to process your images then camera technique is paramount to get the best out of the auto process the camera does for you.

The digital image you have taken is auto processed into a JPEG by the camera. This is based on algorithms pre-programmed into the camera to produce the image. A camera sensor can read quite a decent dynamic range but no where near that of the human eye where the brain is compensating for the degrees of light and tone we see. In one single exposure you are relying on the dynamic range of the sensor and the camera software to produce an average calculation to give an image.

So here you can see this in operation where the camera has tried to average it all out to give a reasonable and usable image. The canal boats in the distance are slightly over exposed as the cyclists are slightly under exposed.

With a RAW file you have the ability to edit for these various differences to correct. You can do it with a JPEG file in editing software but the image will not have all the data and has less tolerance to editing than the original RAW.

I started with film and my analogy in the modern day with digital is that using JPEG straight from the camera is a little like sending your film to Bonus Print to process and develop for you. All machine printed and averages produced from the negative. Using RAW and editing in software such as Photoshop is then akin to going into the darkroom and hand printing your work. Hand prints always give you a better finished image.

If using the camera processed image is what you prefer then there is nothing wrong with that. Equally for me, part of the whole process of producing images is in the processing and Photoshop/Lightroom/Aperture/Paint Shop Pro etc give the digital photographer his/her darkroom. In some instances, even with the best camera technique, you will need some level of human intervention in the processing to get the best out of the image.

Regards
Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

mrswoolybill
mrswoolybill Critique Team 7396 forum postsmrswoolybill vcard United Kingdom971 Constructive Critique Points
23 Mar 2014 - 10:51 AMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Given the inherent difficulties of the subject you have done pretty well, there's detail visible in both the sunlit areas and the shadows. But why the insistence on avoiding post-processing? It's not 'cheating', it's a different matter to 'image manipulation', digital art etc - it's simply part of the whole process. We all try to get it right in the camera, but that's the start of the story, like exposing a film. The digital camera's sensor captures available data, the photographer turns that into the finished image. Like darkroom processing but less messy and without the smells!

And while for many subjects jpegs are fine, this is typical of the area where Raw really is worth considering. Bright sun and dark shadow are both difficult to photograph, put them into the same composition and difficulties multiply.

With jpegs, the camera's 'brain' automatically selects the data that it thinks is important, a relatively small proportion of the total, it edits for you. You have no way of getting at the rest of the data, it hasn't been recorded.

Camera Raw (it's a word not an acronym) really does what it says on the can it records all the raw data available to the camera, 100%, without editing. It has its downside (it's a steep learning curve, it takes additional time, and storage space). For a subject like this, believe me, it would make a big difference! But the first priority should be to get to grips with basic editing.

Looking back over your comments on previous uploads, it would help if you let us know what you are looking for by uploading into the Critique gallery. We are here to give advice and to try to help people to progress . That covers both the taking and the editing of pictures. Let us know what you are trying to convey, capture. And how you hope to progress photographically. It's also important to consider other people's points of view, part of the ethos of the Gallery is to be able to see your own work through other people's eyes.
Moira

Last Modified By mrswoolybill at 23 Mar 2014 - 10:54 AM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  681 forum posts United Kingdom843 Constructive Critique Points
23 Mar 2014 - 3:22 PM

Yes, the camera is simply a tool. A bricklayer has a trowel, often his favourite. My father in law was a bricklayer and often bought second hand trowels from car boot sales because they were, as he put it, worn in. The camera is a tool manufactured to certain standards and tolerances.

It does a certain job depending on your ability to manipulate it. Auto means some elses idea of what is right, the programmer. Youneed to use the tool to create the base image. Younthen use other tools in your virtual bag to finish the job off. Wrongly used, the camera, and the trowel, get it wrobg. Even correctly used, the joints need cleaning up and smoothing.

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.