Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Technically speaking I can't see anything wrong with this photo at all, at this scale on the web. You've even used the -2/3rds exposure compensation to help counter the brighter parts of the white bird from overexposing (the whites along the back look strong white, but I don't think they've overexposed - histogram on your computer should be able to give you a more definitive answer, but they don't stand out to me at all).
Lovely series of shots and a great chance to capture shots of both subjects - one could not ask for more. The 3rd appears the sharpest kinfisher shot though I prefer the looks of the first shot overall.
I really like the idea of this shot - good lighting coming through the mushroom and getting a good low angle to show that aspect in the shot! The bright and colourful background also works well to offset against the more drab colourings of the main subject.
I've been looking at this macro shot for some time, even looking at the large version, but something seems off to my eye. It might just be that this butterfly has vastly different colourings to the ones I am used to seeing, but if you look at the wing closest to the camera around the shoulder, lower bpdy and in some areas back along the length of the wing there is a really odd colouring - the like I normaly see when I pull the levels or curves lines a little too much on one direction.
I love the "looking at you" effect this shot has - a great angle to shoot from and well composed as well. A great shame that your ISO was so high though.
I do like the colouring in this shot - have a very real feeling to it which we don't often see much in digital shooting as was seen in the film era
I can't tell what settings you were using, but I suspect a wide open aperture combined with a shutter speed that was as fast as you could go - with a little underexposing as well for more speed. It looks like your focus is good and that you captured the moment, but even with underexposing for a faster speed (assuming this) the shutter has just not been quick enough.
|Choosing an upgrade path - advice needed||03/02/2013 - 8:31 PM|
|Starwars Episode 7 confirmed for 2015!||30/10/2012 - 9:16 PM|
|Moth traps and egg boxes?||15/08/2012 - 2:04 PM|
|DPD - deliveries - anyone got a contact number?||25/06/2012 - 7:18 PM|
|Walking boots - suggestions on good choices||10/06/2012 - 10:23 PM|
|Looking to Pocketwizards||14/04/2012 - 10:56 PM|
|Why would anyone want a 5D (original)?||29/03/2012 - 1:31 PM|
|The American Society of Mammalogists - any members?||20/03/2012 - 2:24 PM|
|Adobé!||16/03/2012 - 10:35 PM|
|Blocking telephone numbers - effective methods||16/03/2012 - 5:50 PM|
|Lightroom 4 - rendering noise differently to Adobe RAW?||07/03/2012 - 8:32 AM|
|Cameravests - what do you use and why?||14/02/2012 - 10:33 PM|
|Suitable external harddrive for games||05/02/2012 - 8:23 PM|
|Banks and Cheques and torment!||02/02/2012 - 10:39 PM|
|Good/big Photography store in the Lakes - any recommendations?||10/01/2012 - 10:20 PM|
|Metz 44 AF-1 & Canon 600d||14/02/2013 - 9:42 PM|
|Poor English||12/02/2013 - 2:52 PM|
|New ePHOTOzine Feature Coming Soon!||12/02/2013 - 12:00 AM|
|Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM Macro Lens||11/02/2013 - 12:30 PM|
|Why is it very few post out of camera shots without any tweaking?||11/02/2013 - 12:29 PM|
|Jessops as a phoenix from the flames...||11/02/2013 - 12:22 PM|
|Tiny slave flashes||10/02/2013 - 11:59 PM|
|Tamron 180 Macro||10/02/2013 - 8:15 PM|
|Identify this Pheasant||08/02/2013 - 12:39 AM|
|warranties||07/02/2013 - 8:27 PM|
|Tipping||07/02/2013 - 4:16 PM|
|Would you like to be a moderator with ePHOTOzine?||06/02/2013 - 11:08 PM|
|Exposure-Morris and Shaw||05/02/2013 - 10:03 PM|
|Why I don't post landscapes||05/02/2013 - 9:01 PM|
|Choosing an upgrade path - advice needed||05/02/2013 - 8:32 PM|
No portfolios comments on yet.