Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
And another welcome to the site from me!
Technically speaking I can't see anything wrong with this photo at all, at this scale on the web. You've even used the -2/3rds exposure compensation to help counter the brighter parts of the white bird from overexposing (the whites along the back look strong white, but I don't think they've overexposed - histogram on your computer should be able to give you a more definitive answer, but they don't stand out to me at all).
Lovely series of shots and a great chance to capture shots of both subjects - one could not ask for more. The 3rd appears the sharpest kinfisher shot though I prefer the looks of the first shot overall.
I really like the idea of this shot - good lighting coming through the mushroom and getting a good low angle to show that aspect in the shot! The bright and colourful background also works well to offset against the more drab colourings of the main subject.
I've been looking at this macro shot for some time, even looking at the large version, but something seems off to my eye. It might just be that this butterfly has vastly different colourings to the ones I am used to seeing, but if you look at the wing closest to the camera around the shoulder, lower bpdy and in some areas back along the length of the wing there is a really odd colouring - the like I normaly see when I pull the levels or curves lines a little too much on one direction.
I love the "looking at you" effect this shot has - a great angle to shoot from and well composed as well. A great shame that your ISO was so high though.
I do like the colouring in this shot - have a very real feeling to it which we don't often see much in digital shooting as was seen in the film era
I can't tell what settings you were using, but I suspect a wide open aperture combined with a shutter speed that was as fast as you could go - with a little underexposing as well for more speed. It looks like your focus is good and that you captured the moment, but even with underexposing for a faster speed (assuming this) the shutter has just not been quick enough.
|best Macro lens for D5200||01/06/2015 - 11:08 PM|
|Is exposure to and study of good photography a bad thing?||28/05/2015 - 10:24 AM|
|Can anyone recommend a wedding photographer please ? :)||26/05/2015 - 8:21 PM|
|Vaping||25/05/2015 - 8:49 PM|
|Transfer internal images from Canon 6d to PC, can anyone help please||25/05/2015 - 7:26 PM|
|"The fact, though, is that every digital photographer enhances their pictures."||23/05/2015 - 11:06 AM|
|Paying to be on a recommended suppliers list?||19/05/2015 - 1:29 PM|
|Building a Personal website - advice needed||26/04/2015 - 5:11 PM|
|Award shake up||26/04/2015 - 5:06 PM|
|Tripod - quick release plate||26/04/2015 - 4:49 PM|
|what is your pet hate||18/04/2015 - 1:36 PM|
|Choosing a 70-200mm f/2.8 for FF canon||14/04/2015 - 11:17 PM|
|What is more important, the shot or the editing software afterwards?||12/04/2015 - 10:38 PM|
|Taking close ups||11/04/2015 - 12:06 AM|
|Sharpness||11/04/2015 - 12:01 AM|