Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Technically speaking I can't see anything wrong with this photo at all, at this scale on the web. You've even used the -2/3rds exposure compensation to help counter the brighter parts of the white bird from overexposing (the whites along the back look strong white, but I don't think they've overexposed - histogram on your computer should be able to give you a more definitive answer, but they don't stand out to me at all).
Lovely series of shots and a great chance to capture shots of both subjects - one could not ask for more. The 3rd appears the sharpest kinfisher shot though I prefer the looks of the first shot overall.
I really like the idea of this shot - good lighting coming through the mushroom and getting a good low angle to show that aspect in the shot! The bright and colourful background also works well to offset against the more drab colourings of the main subject.
I've been looking at this macro shot for some time, even looking at the large version, but something seems off to my eye. It might just be that this butterfly has vastly different colourings to the ones I am used to seeing, but if you look at the wing closest to the camera around the shoulder, lower bpdy and in some areas back along the length of the wing there is a really odd colouring - the like I normaly see when I pull the levels or curves lines a little too much on one direction.
I love the "looking at you" effect this shot has - a great angle to shoot from and well composed as well. A great shame that your ISO was so high though.
I do like the colouring in this shot - have a very real feeling to it which we don't often see much in digital shooting as was seen in the film era
I can't tell what settings you were using, but I suspect a wide open aperture combined with a shutter speed that was as fast as you could go - with a little underexposing as well for more speed. It looks like your focus is good and that you captured the moment, but even with underexposing for a faster speed (assuming this) the shutter has just not been quick enough.
|Equine Event Photography||08/10/2014 - 8:30 PM|
|Noise reduction and Speckles!||06/10/2014 - 9:54 PM|
|Messenger bag recommendations||20/09/2014 - 5:08 PM|
|Using the Classifieds - problems||10/03/2014 - 11:07 PM|
|Finding a good quality fast printing service||08/10/2013 - 1:35 PM|
|Advice on expanding flash setup and support||18/08/2013 - 8:23 PM|
|Choosing an upgrade path - advice needed||03/02/2013 - 8:31 PM|
|Starwars Episode 7 confirmed for 2015!||30/10/2012 - 9:16 PM|
|Moth traps and egg boxes?||15/08/2012 - 2:04 PM|
|DPD - deliveries - anyone got a contact number?||25/06/2012 - 7:18 PM|
|Walking boots - suggestions on good choices||10/06/2012 - 10:23 PM|
|Looking to Pocketwizards||14/04/2012 - 10:56 PM|
|Why would anyone want a 5D (original)?||29/03/2012 - 1:31 PM|
|The American Society of Mammalogists - any members?||20/03/2012 - 2:24 PM|
|Adobé!||16/03/2012 - 10:35 PM|
|computer "virused"||19/10/2014 - 5:36 PM|
|PC Brigade||19/10/2014 - 5:33 PM|
|Equine Event Photography||17/10/2014 - 9:10 PM|
|First macro lens help (canon)||15/10/2014 - 5:10 PM|
|Serious Amateurs and Pro's are at least here:||14/10/2014 - 2:58 PM|
|Thinking of Moving from Canon to Nikon D3300 Plus std kit lens - comments?||14/10/2014 - 11:06 AM|
|It's called "The Eye"||14/10/2014 - 9:03 AM|
|Is sophistication in software reducing the need for full blown studio's?||12/10/2014 - 11:38 PM|
|Sigma ring flash||12/10/2014 - 10:58 AM|
|The upgrade bug - pet or pest?||09/10/2014 - 11:13 PM|
|Noise reduction and Speckles!||08/10/2014 - 10:20 PM|
|Ebay hiccough||07/10/2014 - 1:54 PM|
|Lenses and teleconverters||06/10/2014 - 9:48 PM|
|The Basics of Photography||04/10/2014 - 10:32 PM|
|Messenger bag recommendations||25/09/2014 - 9:55 PM|
No portfolios comments on yet.