Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Who?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

f13, ISO 200, 1/200sec

Reading can be a challenge when the words are so big!

Setup:
Taken with Canon 400D, Sigma 70mm macro and sigma 1.4 teleconverter. Camera and lens arranged on a single focusing rail (cheap ebay rail) which was attached to a Manfrotto Junior Geared Head and then onto a set of tripod legs.
Lighting was a 580 EX2 with lumiquest softbox mounted on an offcamera flash cord and held from an above position with the flash head directed slightly toward the front of the insect.

The insect itself was slightly cool (naturally) and just happened to be in the room at the time. It was placed onto the book where it eventually settled somewhere (I honestly didn't pose it right over that word, I just let it move itself around till it came still - a thing which made focusing tricky when it would suddenly get up and go).

edit: any advice on dealing with the reflections of the flash and softbox on the insects back would be most welcome. I;ve tried making the softbox itself larger, but it still showing. Is the next stage to move it further away or do I have to go all the way toward lightboxes to get smooth flashbased lighting on such a subject? (I would prefer not to have to use a box as whilst in this shot it would not have been a problem it does pose more limitations outside - and further increases setup time).

Camera:Canon EOS 400D
Lens:Sigma 70mm macro + 1.4 Teleconverter
Recording media:RAW (digital)
Title:Who?
Username:Overread Overread
Uploaded:17 Jan 2010 - 11:00 PM
Tags:Close-up / macro, Wildlife / nature
VS Mode Rating 100 (0% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
VINAI_OF_THE_BOSTON_RED_SOX

Wonderful macro shot! Focusing is spot on!
Vinai

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

metro074
metro074 e2 Member 4metro074 vcard Australia8 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jan 2010 - 4:23 AM

Good macro shot. Well done
Carol

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

LilyWren
LilyWren  4 United Kingdom
18 Jan 2010 - 6:26 AM

Wonderful shot. Love the title too, made me smile!
Smile

Melanie

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  781 forum posts United Kingdom858 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jan 2010 - 9:15 AM

My kind of thing, so I appreciate it. Very difficult to do well, but you have done just that. A lot of work but worth it. Flash beautifully handled.

Didn't know the Sigma converter fitted the 70mm? Obviously does.

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

CathR
CathR  7139 forum posts United Kingdom563 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jan 2010 - 10:15 AM

This shot shows well how little depth of field you get with macro shots Alex even though you have got quite a small aperture. It's a nice idea and definitely made me smile on a foggy Monday morning.

Best wishes

Catherine

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

FredF
FredF  8 France
18 Jan 2010 - 10:43 AM

superbly shot.

Fred

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Overread
Overread  63806 forum posts England18 Constructive Critique Points
18 Jan 2010 - 2:47 PM

Many thanks all Smile
Paul - yes both the sigma 1.4 and 2* teleconverters will fit to the 70mm macro - the join is even very smooth with no forcing needed.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

arhb
arhb e2 Member 72327 forum postsarhb vcard United Kingdom68 Constructive Critique Points
21 Jan 2010 - 2:18 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Just a thought, but maybe a thin grey cloth over the soft box would lessen the reflection.
Also try to fit a deflector inside the softbox to deflect the main beam of light out and onto the reflected surface of the softbox, instead of straight through the front fabric (I dont know if this is fitted already, as part of the softbox - I would like to know either way, as I'm thinking of getting one for my flashgun).

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

strawman
strawman  1022010 forum posts United Kingdom16 Constructive Critique Points
21 Jan 2010 - 2:23 PM

Given your set up I would think of bouncing the light even more, sat having a piece of white card/paper above the insect and bouncing the light down.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Overread
Overread  63806 forum posts England18 Constructive Critique Points
21 Jan 2010 - 3:53 PM

Thanks Arhb and Staw.
The idea of using a deflector is something that I have seen in some of the larger softboxes (studio sized ones) but only ever seen it being used in one custom smaller softbox. The Lumiquest sofboxes don't have any deflector fitting, though they do have a thicker fabric section to the middle of the front of the flash - so as to lessen the light from the very middle.
I'll give some thought to making and fitting some form of custom deflector into the softbox though - it could prove very interesting to see the results of such!

Straw - just to comfirm but when you say break the light up even more do you mean shoot with the sofbox at the reflective paper or to use the flashhead bare onto the paper? The idea of bounclight is something I should be looking more into (esp now I have a 30cm reflector to actually use)

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

User_Removed
21 Jan 2010 - 4:16 PM

Personally, I think there is a little too much foreground. I think a crop to just below the main 'word' would be better.. might upload a mod just to see if that IS the case.

Other than that, very nice (where did you get a ladybird that was that big and could read Wink):

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

arhb
arhb e2 Member 72327 forum postsarhb vcard United Kingdom68 Constructive Critique Points
21 Jan 2010 - 4:45 PM

A cheaper and easier way to lessen the cenre spot light would be to make a ~4inch circle out of white gaffa tape, and stick it to the inside of the softbox front cover at the centre.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

naturenut
naturenut  111801 forum posts England
21 Jan 2010 - 4:45 PM

I think it's a harlequin,
in which case it may have the family lurking somewhere indoors as well Wink

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

zanzibarwinds
21 Jan 2010 - 6:09 PM

Nice photo Alex and welcome to EPZ. Bumped into you on flickr btw

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

dlegros
dlegros  12217 forum posts England
21 Jan 2010 - 8:16 PM

It's a great shot, wonderfully focussed but I think I agree with Barrie about the crop.

As a demonstration of limited depth of field - it's ideal, but artistically, I think the FG is a little distracting.

As for the softbox reflections, I think it's already been said, bounce the light around more.

Great shot though.

Dom

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Paintman
Paintman e2 Member 8869 forum postsPaintman vcard United Kingdom173 Constructive Critique Points
21 Jan 2010 - 8:51 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

I felt a crop would distill the message and focus more on the word and the bug. I straightened the image then increased the contrast selectively. I also selectively sharpened and blurred the image.

Your camera's sensor is due for a clean. It looks like my hoover's dust bagSmile

Alan.

Last Modified By Paintman at 21 Jan 2010 - 8:52 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Overread
Overread  63806 forum posts England18 Constructive Critique Points
21 Jan 2010 - 9:45 PM

Meggsy - yep there is a small army of them hiding out behind the computer at home- sadly I got told this fact after I got back to uni so no chance to get pics of the army.

Thanks for the mod Paintman and for the cropping suggestions Dlegros - I have to say whilst I was thinking of cropping the shot to move the insect more into the upper right corner a bit more the foreground areas were something that I didn't consider adjusting at all.
The contrast enhancement is also telling me that this monitor is really not that good at all - I've had some say that the shot looked a little underexposed and your boost to contrast is really much stronger than I thought the shot needed based on the image I get through this screen. I'll have to play around with getting used to this cheap LCD some more it seems.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Paintman
Paintman e2 Member 8869 forum postsPaintman vcard United Kingdom173 Constructive Critique Points
21 Jan 2010 - 10:21 PM

I've rechecked the histogram and there is little shadow and highlight clipping. It looks fine on my monitor. The contrast isn't OTT, just enough to add impact to the bug.

Regards, Alan.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.