Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Friends

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

I can't figure out how this got displayed horizontally , because in my photos file it appears vertically Blush

I had two film cameras with me one for myself and one for the friend who appears on the background. Shot with my friend's digital camera again, during a photo visit to a park. The dog isn't his, its owner was at my back at the moment the picture was taken.

Do you think that the picture works with his face as being that dark? By the way, the white balance had been set from him while he was shooting at a bright waterfall.

Brand:NIKON CORPORATION
Camera:Nikon D3100 Check out Nikon Nation!
Lens:18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:30 Jul 2013 - 7:02 PM
Focal Length:40mm
Lens Max Aperture:f/5.3
Aperture:f/5.3
Shutter Speed:1/50sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:100
Exposure Mode:Manual
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:No Flash
White Balance:Sunny
Title:Friends
Username:pablophotographer pablophotographer
Uploaded:3 Aug 2013 - 11:34 AM
Tags:Dog, Flowers & plants, General, Pets / captive animals, Portraits / people
VS Mode Rating 92 (6.67% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
lenocm
lenocm e2 Member 1lenocm vcard United Kingdom
3 Aug 2013 - 1:45 PM

Uploaded a modification done in Photoshop Elements 11. Sharpened a little, increased the shadows, decreased the highlights and rotated the image. Wink

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

pablophotographer
pablophotographer e2 Member 3496 forum postspablophotographer vcard 188 Constructive Critique Points
3 Aug 2013 - 3:29 PM

thank you Mile!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

pablophotographer
pablophotographer e2 Member 3496 forum postspablophotographer vcard 188 Constructive Critique Points
3 Aug 2013 - 3:30 PM

typing error there..Thank you Mike!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10988 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2984 Constructive Critique Points
3 Aug 2013 - 3:35 PM

Interestingly, when I downloaded this and opened it in Photoshop CS, the orientation was correct, - I didnt have to do anything!

The question is, does it work with the shade, and it does for me, as theres enough of his features visible with the touch of sunlight. Its a sort of partial silhouette. You can lose the atmosphere of the dappled light scene if you increase shadow detail too much. I would just crop some space from the bottom.

Regards



Willie

Last Modified By banehawi at 3 Aug 2013 - 3:36 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

pamelajean
pamelajean Critique Team 8831 forum postspamelajean vcard United Kingdom1638 Constructive Critique Points
3 Aug 2013 - 8:04 PM

It works for me, Pablo. I like the play of light and shadow. I don't need to see any more detail of the man.
However, if it is a friend and you really wanted a good picture of him, then it may not be ok for you personally. Did you consider using flash at the time of shooting?

If the image is not for that purpose, but purely aesthetic, then it is quite artistic, with the strength of the dark figure against the bright background. With the strong light behind your subject, he is bound to be dark, but I wonder if this was your intention. The effect of backlighting adds drama and mood, and can be used to create very appealing photos, making use of the contrast between bright light coming from behind and the shade on your subjectís face when he turns away from the sun.

On the contrary, just because your subject is backlit doesnít mean you need to forget about how he is lit from the front, and using a fill flash can be a great way to get the balance right for a well exposed shot, providing more even lighting. The choice is yours.

In my first modification I cropped the image, maintaining your aspect ratio, removing the handbag on the fence, and a bit from the top and bottom, concentrating on your friend, the dog, the man in the background and the glorious effect of the light. I cloned out a few hot spots in the trees and a few marks on the ground. I also ran the burn tool over the bright area behind the man's right shoulder.
My second modification simulates the use of flash. I selected the near-silhouetted man and gave him a Levels adjustment.

Pamela.

Last Modified By pamelajean at 3 Aug 2013 - 8:07 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

pablophotographer
pablophotographer e2 Member 3496 forum postspablophotographer vcard 188 Constructive Critique Points
5 Aug 2013 - 5:05 PM

Thank you Willie and Pamela. I think the somehow darker versions are more true to the original scene as I remember it. My friend was walking towards me and it is true as Lenocm noticed he may needed some sharpening, but to be honest with him almost in the dark and my manual focusing simultaneously, not to mention my vision, the result was errrmmm ok Smile My friend did not complain for the original file so all good. Thanks agian everyone for their input and time.

Kind regards
pablophotographer

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

jrpics
jrpics e2 Member 6jrpics vcard United Kingdom
22 Nov 2013 - 10:38 PM

Just call it Sidewalk. Looks good to me.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

pablophotographer
pablophotographer e2 Member 3496 forum postspablophotographer vcard 188 Constructive Critique Points
22 Nov 2013 - 11:39 PM


Quote: Just call it Sidewalk. Looks good to me.

Hi John, your title makes me suppose you see it sideways... like everyone else I suppose - (thanks for the title idea) Willie (banehawi) had said when he opened it in Photoshop the orientation was correct... the mystery deepens, lol.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

WesternRed
WesternRed e2 Member 3WesternRed vcard Australia
15 Jan 2014 - 3:09 AM

A great capture using the shadow for a theme. Well done.
WesternRed.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.