Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Connect to User

loading
11/01/2010 - 2:31 PM

River Festival

River FestivalI'm with shawpaul - image in bottom Rh corner not entirely condusive with idea composition for this type of image. Good sense of movement, but would prefer the sharp plane on the driver - difficult though I know this to be.

paul
10/01/2010 - 10:29 AM

Potting shed

Potting shedYes, the mods are a great improvement. The brightest area in the frame tends to drag the eye and if it is over bright it becomes more pulling than the subject.

Experiment and try things.

paul
07/01/2010 - 12:38 PM

Winter Teasel

Winter Teaselgood enough image, but it is better to expose for the highlights and lighten the shadows and darker areas later. Always expose to record maximum detail - thus for the highlights.

paul
07/10/2009 - 11:34 AM

Duck

DuckDon't mind cut off body, but as such would prefer evn closer. Head well separated from background by shallow depth of field.

Paul
30/08/2009 - 11:28 AM

Kippers for breakfast!

Kippers for breakfast!Very good clean and interesting record. Possibly a bit more appealing with, as mentioned, with a jaunty angle and a bit closer.

paul
23/08/2009 - 4:43 PM

dead cork oak (ec01)

dead cork oak (ec01)The image is a good record, but I think you were struggling simply because you are in bright sun with no interesting lighting.

This image requires a 'sky'. Sunset, clouds, storm, whatever - but not just a blank blue.

A polariser on camera might have helped, depending where the sun actually was - it needs to be at right angles to your viewpoint.

Paul
23/08/2009 - 4:37 PM

Staircase

StaircaseYou have done your own crit. Nice subject and good composition but the bottom is washed out. Try burning in or a step wedge to darken the bottom. Better, expose for the highlights when shooting.

It is much easier to lighten the dark areas in software than try and put detail back into blown highlights.

paul
19/08/2009 - 6:36 PM

Exposure By The Elements

Exposure By The ElementsVery over exposed and the final mod above is much better. You must check your LCD and histogram if you have time and always expose for HIGHLIGHTS, not shadows. You can retrieve detail from shadows, but you cannot replace burnt out detail in highlights.

Paul
19/08/2009 - 6:05 PM

Bee on my Lavender

Bee on my LavenderQuite interesting to look at, but better if you get in rather closer, and your 18/55 - if it is the kit lens, will not let you.

Macro is a specialist subject and you have made a good try. It is better not to have very large blurred items in the forground thought - the sharpest image should be the most prominent.

Paul
20/04/2009 - 9:24 AM

flowercompo

flowercompoInteresting - a lot of impact. The type of shot seen on the wall in a modern minimalist appartment. Not sure about the very high contrast, but that is a very personal observation. Nice to see you trying siomething different.

Paul
19/03/2009 - 7:49 AM

Windmill 1

Windmill 1A good shot WITHOUT the artificial sun and rays - I'm afraid that destroys the image for me - but at least you tried something different.

I have to ask - are you adding or increasing image saturation. If so, i would hold back a bit. I've looked at some of your other work and it is all heavily saturated.

I have a 300D, now rarely used, but it tended to uder saturate if anything. Check your onboard settings.

paul
15/03/2009 - 8:19 AM

Dunmore Petrol Pump - B&W

Dunmore Petrol Pump - B&WInteresting and worthwhile. Definately a B&W shot and would be in Ireland. Modification is better - B&W needs depth, contrast and punch - I printed in a wet darkroom for 40 years! There MUSt be pure whites and full blacks - usually.

Paul