Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Pete

Connect to User

loading

How things have changed

Pete > Pete Blog > How things have changed
10/05/2012 - 10:16 AM



Unique views 390 (582)

I just saw a lens review on a camera equipment hire company's web site. It made me reflect on how the publishing industry has changed in the past decade or so.

When I started reviewing equipment for magazines, I was in a position of authority. It was before the web, so the only advice photographers could get would be from friends (did they really know), local camera shop experts (could they really be trusted) or one of the few magazines in circulation (assumed a trusted source). If you were blessed with an ability to read another language you could pick up a foreign photo magazine from the airport or abroad. That was more or less it.

As a reviewer of the leading photo magazine, Practical Photography, I always got one of the first products in the country. The companies usually had two or three samples and we, along with Amateur Photographer, were top on pecking order.

We received the cameras before they reached the dealers, and way before the deadline for the magazine, that would be out when the cameras first appeared in the shops. We had a month or so to use the camera and perform a thorough test. We thought we had a challenging job. The camera was probably several months old by the time the public heard about it.

Now, as soon as a camera appears from the factory product line it's announced. They are rushed into individual countries and a few more samples are available for test, but often at the same time they appear in the shops. The demands from reviewers has risen ten-fold. Now, not only do you have the hardcore photo mags (of which there are four times as many as there where when I started), but also tech mags, lifestyle mags, newspapers technology supplements, online resources, freelance journos and a stream of bloggers (often enthusiasts who can set up a web site), not to mention camera retailers and random other streams, like our camera repairer that prompted this thread. Hundreds all wanting the same few cameras. Fortunately ePHOTOzine has always been higher up the pecking order than most, but what we thought was challenging back in the day is now a totally different ball game.

Not only that, because the camera is out in the retailers at the same time as we get one, there's often some enthusiast / anorak who queues up to buy one and then writes a fully comprehensive review and publishers it on his blog that night. Not to forget the umpteen other countries magazine web sites and bloggers who are all fighting to be first to publish.

We used to have a month to use a camera, thoroughly test it and write a review, now we often only have days, sometimes a few hours!

Where does that leave the trusty old paper based photo magazine? Well you can guess - they're struggling big time.

Comments

conrad
conrad  910873 forum posts116 Constructive Critique Points
10 May 2012 - 9:29 PM

Being a brave new world doesn't always mean that this new world is easier!

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links 
11 May 2012 - 11:08 AM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

SlowSong
SlowSong e2 Member 54168 forum postsSlowSong vcard England28 Constructive Critique Points
11 May 2012 - 11:08 AM

I often read internet opinions and critiques of new equipment but have always waited for respected magazines to do their in-depth try outs before actually buying. Both have their advantages. You may read about niggles and glean snippets of useful information from the internet reviewers that magazines don't always pick up on or publish. Most recently I was aching for a Fujifilm X10 but having waited and read everything, and taking in all the pros and cons, finally decided on a Canon S100. I can't see the internet taking over from a proper photography magazine. If that were the case we wouldn't have seen the mushrooming of new titles over the last few years.

joshwa
joshwa ePHOTOzine Staff 3593 forum postsjoshwa vcard United Kingdom
19 May 2012 - 5:07 PM

It seems that retailers get the information first, and it's often them that leak the information before journalists have even seen or heard about the products...

croberts
croberts  102160 forum posts Ireland8 Constructive Critique Points
11 Jul 2012 - 12:58 AM

Make your reviews better than everyone elses, then. Not rocket science! Its a really feckin competitive world out there. no point in complaining.... I wonder about camera reviews anyway, they rarely if ever tell me what it was like to use the camera, how it felt, did it get in the way etc.. just a lot of measurebating, and rewording of spec announcements... and usually from someone who cant shoot a bloody picture anyway, no matter what they have to work with..

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.