Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

7 hours old - original

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

For those who asked, here is the original seal image.

Ploughman.

Brand:Pentax
Camera:Pentax K-5 Check out PENTAXPORTAL!
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:5 Nov 2012 - 2:28 PM
Focal Length:200mm
Aperture:f/9.0
Shutter Speed:1/400sec
Exposure Comp:-0.3
ISO:800
Exposure Mode:Aperture-priority AE
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:Off, Did not fire
White Balance:Auto
Title:7 hours old - original
Username:Ploughman Ploughman
Uploaded:6 Nov 2012 - 10:10 PM
Tags:Wildlife / nature
VS Mode Rating 101 (66.67% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:1

Comments

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 1164 forum posts Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 11:40 PM

This is way better quality wise. You clearly did something to this image to end up with what you uploaded in the first instance. There seems to be a fade overall but quality-wise there's much much less noise and no signs of posterisation. This isn't a monitor calibration issue, something happened in post-processing to introduce noise and posterisation. One reason could be that since this was JPEG format, it didn't allow you to play around with it much, hence the noise and posterisation.

Try shooting in RAW and doing image adjustments in a RAW editor, works better in the long term.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10781 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2795 Constructive Critique Points
8 Nov 2012 - 2:32 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Thanks for uploading this. Its a very good shot, - much better than the last version would lead you to believe.

I can see your dilema that youve tried to address in the mod and if you go back to that one, I have uploaded a mod of this shot.

This one starts out underexposed, and when this is resolved, it looks quite good. Its then very clear that the discoulouration on the pup are remnants of the birth, and are simply a dark tone.

What this image has though that makes it special, is the (presumably) mother in the background, in a pose that is suggestive of exhaustion. I would definitely leave her in, and go for a wider crop.

So, the mod has exposure corrected, slight contrast boost, very slight sharpening of the pups head, and Ive enhanced the pups eye by lifting the shadows, and lightening the catchlights.



Willie

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.