Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

7 Hours Old

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

First time with this lens, a Tamron 70-300 on the K5. I have used it a great deal since 2007 on K100d and K20d. It has always focused very well. I never considered it would do any different on the K5. Well, it back focuses quite a bit and therefore I know what I will be doing tomorrow.
Taken at Donna Nook, just south of Grimsby an the east coast of England.

Brand:Pentax
Camera:Pentax K-5 Check out PENTAXPORTAL!
Lens:Tamron 70-300 Check out Totally Tamron!
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:5 Nov 2012 - 2:28 PM
Focal Length:200mm
Aperture:f/9.0
Shutter Speed:1/400sec
Exposure Comp:-0.3
ISO:800
Exposure Mode:Aperture-priority AE
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:Off, Did not fire
White Balance:Auto
Title:7 Hours Old
Username:Ploughman Ploughman
Uploaded:5 Nov 2012 - 10:21 PM
Tags:Close-up / macro, General, Wildlife / nature
VS Mode Rating 102 (60% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum posts Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
5 Nov 2012 - 11:43 PM

Modified this a bit, cropped, blur and noise-reduction to address posterisation in the original image, re-sharpened after resize. Hope you like the mod.

Did you sharpen this image a lot? There seems to be quality-loss in the image, possibly from over-sharpening or playing around with levels tool - there's clear sign of posterisation near the closest eye and in the fur (shadow/highlight area). Careful with that. Hope my mod, though more blurred, addresses these issues to your satisfaction.

Last Modified By alistairfarrugia at 5 Nov 2012 - 11:44 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Focus_Man
Focus_Man  4481 forum posts United Kingdom631 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 9:14 AM

One of those "Ah!" shots, maybe closer up on the face could also appeal.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum posts Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 9:21 AM

Have to agree with Focus_Man... Frank right (trying to remember names now).

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

iancrowson
iancrowson e2 Member 4211 forum postsiancrowson vcard United Kingdom129 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 12:28 PM

Good appealing image. Composition is excellent. Selective focusing on the eyes effective and looks spot on to me. You did well getting that close.
Ian

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum posts Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 12:39 PM

Out of curiosity, what's this animal? An otter?

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Ploughman
Ploughman  228 forum posts United Kingdom3 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 5:53 PM

alistairfarrugia,
Thanks for your suggestions, the animal is a 7 hour old wild seal pup.
Not sure about your modification to the image, it does not look to be an improvement on my monitor. I`m not sure your monitor is calibrated correctly. How do you do your calibrations ?
I had a look at your website, some very nice images there. I particularly like your aircraft shots. My wife and I live on the climb out of RAF Coningsby, the home to The Battle Of Britain flight. By the time the modern jet Typhoons reach us they are very high indeed but, with the Spitfires, Lancaster, Hurricanes and Dakota (DC3) it is a bit different, the Lanc is still on full power and climbing away in majesty. 18 miles to the north is RAF Scampton the home of the Red Arrows, we see them flying regularly.

Focus Man,
Ah, indeed. A closer shot would look good. Thanks for having a look.

Ian,
Thank you Ian, the shot was hand held in a strong wind. I have more and may post another soon.

Ploughman.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum posts Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 6:02 PM

Not sure if this might be the case of seeing the same image in a different manner, but your image looks very grainy and colours are exhibiting some posterisation. I've seen this image on both my work computer and my home computer, and the grain and posterised colours look the same. I calibrated brightness based on the calibration tool on ephotozine itself, but other than that I didn't do anything else. Could this be related to the colour profile? That debate about Adobe and sRGB - not too familiar with the theme but I know it's a possible reason why two people see the same image differently.

Finally, thanks about your comments re: my work - I appreciate. It would be lovely if I lived there, as I absolutely love WW2 aircraft! Pity we don't have them flying here. Only one Hurri in flying condition here, but no one ever takes her up for a flight!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10988 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2984 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 6:54 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

What post processing modifications have you done with this image? Do you still have the original you could upload as a modification? Theres are a number of very odd looking areas in the seal fur, blue, orange, yellow, combined with a complete absence of fur detail in these areas. Behind the Pup, theres bluish areas, and the grass appears over sharpened all over.

I cant really add any suggestions unless I see the original shot, as I cant tell if youve introduced some issues, or if they are original. The over sharpening is certainly a function of post processing.

Also, - make sure you assign the sRGB colour space to images uploaded to the web to ensure browsers can interpret colours correctly, - some, as in all except Firefox cannot handle un tagged images correctly.



Regards


Willie

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum posts Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 9:40 PM

Well thanks Willie, seems I'm not the only one to notice those issues then! Smile The original SOOC shot would help here I guess.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Ploughman
Ploughman  228 forum posts United Kingdom3 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 9:58 PM

Hi folks, yes I have the original and will post it soon. At the moment I am not an e2 member and I think I am limited to one small sized image per day.
Thanks for all your help.
Ploughman

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10988 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2984 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 10:08 PM

No, you can upload it now, as a modification. Just select modifications, then upload, thats it.

Willie

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

iancrowson
iancrowson e2 Member 4211 forum postsiancrowson vcard United Kingdom129 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 11:21 PM

I've looked at the original and mod on four screens and three browsers. The mod is not good on any and is particularly poor on my calibrated (with Spyder) iMac screen using Safari. I would add to your advice that alistair checks out his monitor.
I would recommend following Willie advice, it will be useful. I've seen a few instances on this sight were people are seeing the same image very differently due to monitor or browsers differences. It not fully realised how browsers read, not just HTML, but colours differently.
Still a well composed and cracking image,
Regards
Ian

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum posts Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
6 Nov 2012 - 11:44 PM

Ian, I checked this out on two monitors and my mobile phone - same issues occur on each display. I don't think it's a question of monitor calibration here. I hazard to guess that the JPEG was a limiting factor, and that meddling with either saturation, exposure, contrast, sharpness or all of these elements resulted in a picture that is clearly displaying posterisation and high-noise. The original image further proves my original point, as these issues are not present.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

iancrowson
iancrowson e2 Member 4211 forum postsiancrowson vcard United Kingdom129 Constructive Critique Points
7 Nov 2012 - 8:00 AM

Lets wait for Willie to come with his advice, Willie has years of expertise. I have a fair amount of photoshop experience myself but would never jump in with advice based on assumptions/ guess's made by looking at a 600 pp images.
Ian

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  789 forum posts United Kingdom880 Constructive Critique Points
7 Nov 2012 - 9:44 PM

Decent shot. Know the area well. North Lincs born and bred. Would prefer a tighter shot on the face and there is an element of blue. The image does look a bit over processed. I vet the feeling that many people try and go too far. Most images need a density and contrasr adjustment, a bit of dodging and burning in, the a slight sharpen. Nothing more.

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10988 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2984 Constructive Critique Points
8 Nov 2012 - 2:42 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

I can see your dilema that youve tried to address in the mod following your upload of the original. The original is a very good shot, thats underexposed. You used a -1/3 compensation, where a + 2/3 or so was needed.

When the exposure is resolved, it looks quite good. Its then very clear that the discoulouration on the pup are remnants of the birth, and are simply a dark tone.

What this image has though that makes it special, is the (presumably) mother in the background, in a pose that is suggestive of exhaustion. I would definitely leave her in, and go for a wider crop.

So, the mod has exposure corrected, slight contrast boost, very slight sharpening of the pups head, and Ive enhanced the pups eye by lifting the shadows, and lightening the catchlights.

Hope this is helpful.



Willie

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Ploughman
Ploughman  228 forum posts United Kingdom3 Constructive Critique Points
8 Nov 2012 - 4:06 PM

Thank you Willie,
In the original post I mentioned that the pup was born seven hours previously. Yes the exhausted mother is in the background and afterbirth from this pup and plenty of others is all around. It was a grab shot done in jpeg and as the camera tends to overexpose slightly the e/c was set to -1/3.
It is good to see how observant you are. There is indeed afterbirth dried on to the pup.

Richard.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.