Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Little Drayton Church

salopian > Gallery > Little Drayton Church

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Scheduled Downtime: 19th June 2013 @ 11pm BST. Read More
Add Comment

I was attracted by the symmetry and general tidiness of the area and the sunlight, reflecting off the light coloured paving, seems to give a pleasant non directional lighting to the stonework. The question is " have I seen the light?", in this case the security light - one minute I am tempted to clone it out, then I change my mind - any thoughts?

Geoff

Brand:FUJIFILM
Camera:Fujifilm FinePix X10
Lens:fujinon f2 28-112 (eq)
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:31 Aug 2012 - 1:07 PM
Focal Length:14.8mm
Lens Max Aperture:f/2.0
Aperture:f/3.6
Shutter Speed:1/320sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:100
Exposure Mode:Program AE
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:Off, Did not fire
White Balance:Auto
Title:Little Drayton Church
Username:salopian salopian
Uploaded:24 Sep 2012 - 5:57 PM
Tags:Architecture, Church, Light
VS Mode Rating 100 (44.44% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Modifications wanted Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

paulbroad
24 Sep 2012 - 6:27 PM
0

I would clone it out. It is rather ibvious and out of place. A great pity such things are needed, but an older light fitting could have been used. Otherwise a nice shot of some technical competence. I would have no idea what the rest of the church looked like, so title a little general.

Paul

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
24 Sep 2012 - 9:35 PM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

I'm of the opinion these days, prompted by a certain Mr. McFade, that cloning things out isn't such a necessity as I used to think it was. Consequently, I've begun leaving telephone lines and such like in my images because, in actuality, they were there.

In this particular instance, although I'm leaning towards leaving the light where it is, I'm undecided.

There, that was no help whatsoever, was it . . . ?

Bren.

Focus_Man
25 Sep 2012 - 8:37 AM
0

I most certainly would clone it out. It looks out of place and there is absolutely no necessity to leave it in. You are not recording as "As is" record shot but attempting to create a pleasing picture, as per your 'description'.

This door would make for a nice backdrop for pictures of a bride & groom.

Frank

Last Modified By Focus_Man at 25 Sep 2012 - 8:48 AM
paulbroad
25 Sep 2012 - 8:51 AM
0

Cloning out certain objects depends onthe purpose of the image. If pictorial, then removing certain items is a good idea. If pure record, leave them in. Up toyou, actually.

Paul

salopian
salopian (e2 Member)
1
salopian vcard United Kingdom9 Constructive Critique Points
25 Sep 2012 - 11:48 AM
0

Looks as though it will have to go!. Thanks for the comments - Bren made me smileGrin
Geoff

pamelajean
pamelajean (Critique Team)
7
537 forum postspamelajean vcard United Kingdom1312 Constructive Critique Points
25 Sep 2012 - 4:38 PM
0

The image is lovely, lots of shape and texture, and I love old doors.
If it were mine, I would clone out the light. My reasoning is that it spoils the overall effect because it isn't old, and the chances of someone saying, "There is a light missing" is extremely unlikely.
Pamela.

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.