Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Garden Lights

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

This was taken with a Canon 600D

Aperture: f/8
Shutter: 30 sec
ISO: 200
Lens: 18-55mm
Focal length: 33mm
Tripod was used

Brand:Canon
Camera:Canon EOS 600D
Lens:18.0 - 55.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 28.3 - 86.5 mm)
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:12 Feb 2013 - 7:45 PM
Focal Length:33mm
Aperture:f/8.0
Shutter Speed:30sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:200
Exposure Mode:Manual
Metering Mode:Evaluative
Flash:Off, Did not fire
White Balance:Auto
Title:Garden Lights
Username:Sone Sone
Uploaded:30 Mar 2013 - 11:58 AM
Tags:Flowers & plants
VS Mode Rating 98 (0% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum posts Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
30 Mar 2013 - 12:19 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Hi there. I'll try be the first to offer some critique here. First off, may I congratulate you on the original subject. It's not often we see pictures of garden lights here. This, however, is the first element I'll tackle - what was it that made you take the picture? What effect or theme were you after? Did you want to send across a particular message with this photo?

One suggestion I can put forward is to maybe use a different angle on the light, maybe go for a much lower angle to show the lights as a taller object, sort of imposing on the surrounding flowers and leaves. You would get very low and aim high, position the bulb on a third intersection, and ensuring that the glow from the lighting would brighten up the nearby leaves, as was done with the above picture. The edges of the image would then be darker where the glow fades out, and it would form a natural vignette, once again, as is already the case with your original upload. I like that element.

One further element that you could try show more of is the pebbles on the floor. This would give you three different elements - the flowers/plants, the lighting, and the pebbles. At present, the pebbles barely show and it's an otherwise nice element that maybe should have featured more in the image.

I'll try my hand at a mod soon and upload.

Alistair

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum posts Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
30 Mar 2013 - 12:39 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Straightened a bit (1.6 degrees counter-clockwise), adjusted colours through simple brightness/contrast correction, added some sharpness after resizing, re-composed by placing the bulb on the top-left third intersection and added frame to close off the darker parts with a contrasting white line running throughout (frame). This helps "close" the image in my mind, whereas in your original upload the lack of frame made the image sort of "spill" across the page, enhancing the fact that the bulb was too centrally positioned in the original upload. With a frame, you strengthen the composition using the rule of thirds as guideline.

Hope this helps!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Sone
Sone  1 South Africa
30 Mar 2013 - 12:46 PM

Thank you!

Thia was taken as homework for a course i was attending. The excercise was how to work with you're lightmeter and certain exposures. We had to take pictures of amusement parks, casinos, staircases, tunnels, city streets, highways, and so on. It began at an aperture of 1 sec, and went on as follows: 2sec, 4sec, 8sec, 15sec, and 30 sec. As the aperture changes, the picture goes from dark with little detail to more detail. That picture was the last one (30sec). I have PLENTY more of my homework I want to share, and some of my own experements as well.

Thanks fot your comment&

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

mrswoolybill
mrswoolybill Critique Team 7420 forum postsmrswoolybill vcard United Kingdom1005 Constructive Critique Points
30 Mar 2013 - 3:47 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Welcome to the site, I hope that you enjoy it - it's a good place to learn.
I like the challenges that you are being set, they give a lot of scope for creative interpretation.
Alistair has covered the main points and his Mod is an improvement. I would just add that a 30 second exposure is risky when taking a close-up of an outdoor subject like this, I suspect that there was a hint of breeze and you have some subject movement, that's why some leaves look soft.
You're shooting jpegs - has anything been said on your course about using RAW? You're obviously being asked to tackle some very tricky light conditions, and RAW would allow you a lot more scope to adjust the light in your images.
Just as a point of terminology, aperture refers to the size of the hole that allows light through the lens (the lower the f number the larger the aperture), the figures that you quote are shutter speed - the length of time for the exposure.
Looking forward to seeing more coursework.
Moira

Last Modified By mrswoolybill at 30 Mar 2013 - 3:52 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Sone
Sone  1 South Africa
30 Mar 2013 - 4:22 PM

Thank you Moira, i will upload more course homework. And yes, I know about RAW, but the reason I am not using it yet is because I dont have the proper program to do my editing on RAW, but I will soon have it. I would certainly play with the RAW files and see how it goes. Which program do you guys prefer to download for an Intermediate photographer like me?

I have to lear how to use these programs used for editing, because I am not used to change my images, haha I am just having fun. I have had a few photos that were nice but not good enough and there editing would have helped.

Thank you for your comment*

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Sone
Sone  1 South Africa
30 Mar 2013 - 5:09 PM

Please do go to my photos under the COURSE HOMEWORK album for more examples of my work

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

mrswoolybill
mrswoolybill Critique Team 7420 forum postsmrswoolybill vcard United Kingdom1005 Constructive Critique Points
30 Mar 2013 - 7:53 PM

I haven't used free downloads for years, I'm hoping someone with recent experience will come in here, but perhaps look at GIMP? I've heard very divided opinions on it, some people love it, some hate it.
If you were able to look at purchased software, Adobe Elements would give you everything you need and I assume that you would qualify for a student discount.
Moira

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Sone
Sone  1 South Africa
30 Mar 2013 - 8:33 PM

I have seen elements and it looks easy to use and fun. Perhaps I would get the student discount. hehe Smile Thank you for all your help! Means a LOT *

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  781 forum posts United Kingdom850 Constructive Critique Points
1 Apr 2013 - 5:00 PM

Make sure that you fully understand what a good image looks like before you venture into RAW. RAW gives the best results but only if you understand the conversion process. You are calling shutter speed aperture, so I suspect you need to step back and think a bit.

You have used a shutter speed of 30 sec at f8 here and I find that difficult to believe. This close to a light source, 1/30sec at f8 would be more likely. I trust you used a tripod because things are not terribly sharp. If the execercise was on metering, what meter mode did you use and what did you meter from? The light? The shadow?

With a digital camera and subject like this use manual and check exposure on the LCD which will help with exposure assessment. If you really want to know the in and out of metering, beg or borrow a hand light meter.

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.