Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Will I live?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

PRIZES GALORE! Enter The ePHOTOzine Exclusive Christmas Prize Draw; Over £10,000 Worth of Prizes! Plus A Gift For Everybody On Christmas Day!
Add Comment

Been having a bit of a lay off as some will realise. Busy at home amongst other things so few comments lately. However, here's another to have a go at.

Shot in the street in Whitby whilst my better half was shopping. I stand outside clothes shops if possible!

Shot using Liveview on the 7D. No noise to speak of as fairly close to her. Camera round neck but held sideways on at mid chest level so that I could see the LCD. No one seems to notice.

EOS 7D. Autofocus. Aperture priority f3.5. 105mm Sigma EX DG Macro. IS on. ISO 200. 1/400 @ f3.5. Light quite low.

Paul

Camera:Canon EOS 7D
Lens:105mm Sigma Macro.
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Title:Will I live?
Username:paulbroad paulbroad
Uploaded:7 Apr 2014 - 8:26 AM
Tags:Cigarette, Portraits / people, Smoke., Woman
VS Mode Rating 101 (100% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Modifications wanted Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
kel55
kel55 e2 Member 2kel55 vcard United Kingdom8 Constructive Critique Points
7 Apr 2014 - 9:08 AM

Interesting shot and title fits so well , I would like to take more street shots but always feels a bit awkward , great advice on your sneaky technique , simple but clever ,

Kel

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

NDODS
NDODS e2 Member 43684 forum postsNDODS vcard United Kingdom107 Constructive Critique Points
7 Apr 2014 - 9:09 AM

Great covert imagery. Love the subject, the smoke trails wonderfully defined against the black background subject.

Regards Nathan GrinGrinGrin

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

cats_123
cats_123 e2 Member 104250 forum postscats_123 vcard Northern Ireland25 Constructive Critique Points
7 Apr 2014 - 9:58 AM

excellent focsuing and subject matter Smile

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Sooty_1
Sooty_1 Critique Team 41267 forum posts United Kingdom203 Constructive Critique Points
7 Apr 2014 - 12:00 PM

If only the chap with the glasses hadn't been there!
The woman's expression is good, she's sharp, and apart from wishing the crop was a little wider, I like the composition. Without the chap behind, she would be sharp against a muted background, and the image would be much stronger. I'd like to see all of her hand.

Unfortunately, I don't think a 105 mm lens is ideal for street shooting, because you often need a decent distance to shoot, and you get a lot of stuff in the way, unless you are only after close cropped head shots. A shorter focal length is better, and you can always crop from a wider view.
Most street shooters use a 35/50, or similar, but that does involve getting a bit closer.

I must admit, I'm not a fan of being sneaky, as when you are found out, people tend to react adversely. At least if you're open about it, there is no suggestion of underhandedness.

Nick

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  789 forum posts United Kingdom880 Constructive Critique Points
7 Apr 2014 - 2:34 PM

I think, in about 30 years of shooting sneaky stuff, I 've been rumbled twice. Once caused an arguement, one a laugh. The thing is, it's not illegal in this country, UK, and you shouldn't get spotted if you are careful. It only becomes a problem on private priperty or if you cause an affray. In the UK, you do not own the copyright of your own features. An interesting one.

What is private property can be an issue in a case where, say, the local council owns the area. I would argue that I am, thus, a part owner! I pay my tax.

I normally use even longer lenses for street shooting. Why not? Distance is even better for not getting spotted and even if they see you, they have no idea you are using a long kens just on them, they think they are part of a much wider vista. You also have narrow depth of field on your side.

I do use wider angle in crowds at markets, but then use the bridge camera with all sounds turned off. No noise, no indication you have shot, even from a couple of feet.


For me, most good street shots tend to be frame filling shots of heads or a few heads. Just what I like to see.

Looking at her expression, she maybe wishing the chap wasn't there, too. He was with her.

It's all about a bit of fun and common sense, I think. I use street photography to pass my time as my wife shops.

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  789 forum posts United Kingdom880 Constructive Critique Points
7 Apr 2014 - 6:47 PM

The thing is, if you are not sneaky, the shot is not a candid, and that is an accepted area of photography.

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

dudler
dudler Critique Team 11164 forum postsdudler vcard England390 Constructive Critique Points
7 Apr 2014 - 6:59 PM

I think there's a distinction between a candid and a sneaky picture. This is not a sneaky shot! "Sneaky" would be aiming to get a shot that is unkindly unrepresentative of the person (scope to discuss, of course - but that's my starter for ten).

The lesson on technique is really useful, and I am sure that new togs wil lbenefit both from Paul's initial comments, and hte discussion above. Live view has brought back the viewing options that waist level finders used to give - for low (or abouve the head) shooting, and for going sideways, as Paul has.

This is hard to fault, really. I quite like the "echoing" faces in the background, though I suppose, ideally, the man woudl be slightly further forwards to (almost) even out the spacing!

I'd love to see just a fraction more space at the bottom, to include the lady's thumb.

Otherwise, it's jsut about perfect: and any way round, I wish I'd taken it!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Jestertheclown

Hi Paul,
I like it.
An 8x10 crop removes that grey bit on the RHS and with a little tweaking, also takes out the dark area on the LHS.
Just an idea.
Bren.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.