Do you think you know the difference between a manipulated and real photo as research suggests many people aren't able to.
| Industry NewsOriginal photograph of woman near canal - credit Sophie Nightingale/University of Warwick
The results of an online experiment conducted by Warwick University suggests that quite a few people are easily fooled by manipulated photographs.
The research, led by Sophie Nightingale from the Department of Psychology, has discovered that when people were faced with manipulated images of real-world scenes, they failed to spot around thirty-five percent of them.
659 people aged 13-70 were asked to view a set of images of ordinary scenes, some of which had been digitally altered by the researchers, and they were asked if they thought the photographs they were viewing had been digitally altered.
Manipulated photograph of woman near canal - credit Sophie Nightingale/University of Warwick
Just over half (58%) of the original, unaltered images were correctly identified and only 65% of the photographs which had been manipulated were spotted. Plus, those who thought a photo had been manipulated weren't always able to say which part of the image was edited.
"The research suggests that people, in general, have an extremely limited ability to detect and locate manipulations of real-world scenes," say the researchers.
Take The Test
Do you think you can score better than the average? Take the test for yourself over on the Warwick University website.
(Via PDNPULSE)

Support this site by purchasing Plus Membership, or shopping with one of our affiliates: Amazon UK, Amazon US, Amazon CA, ebay UK, MPB. It doesn't cost you anything extra when you use these links, but it does support the site, helping keep ePHOTOzine free to use, thank you.
You must be a member to leave a comment.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Join for free
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
ADVERTISEMENT