Regatta Offer: Save 15% on 'Top Picks' With Code TP15

Latest Camera Comments

Latest comments, thoughts and reaction to our recently reviewed Camera Equipment, including the Nikon Z6 II Review.

stevedigip
Interesting review. A lot of existing Z series users would like to know how much improvement in AF there is now the camera has dual processors. Ive been very happy with the AF in my Z6/Z7 since firmware 3.0 for almost any subject but prefer my D500 3D AF mode for fast moving action - would be good to know how the mark II cameras compare to the Mark ones for AF performance.

Made by stevedigip on 18 Nov 2020 11:44AM, join in and reply to this comment!  Reply

roughall
I am using this super camera more than 5 years and i think it is the best..









Made by roughall on 14 Nov 2020 6:25PM, join in and reply to this comment!  Reply

roughall
I am using this super camera more than 5 years and i think it is the best..









Made by roughall on 14 Nov 2020 6:23PM, join in and reply to this comment!  Reply

Greynerd
With the latest rumours that JIP are going to focus on Pro stuff this rather special little camera line may be coming to an end. I do hope not and it is spared. It fixes the electronic shutter being exiled in to a special mode so more back on course.

Made by Greynerd on 31 Oct 2020 4:08PM, join in and reply to this comment!  Reply

DonaldS1000
It’s obvious that the writer of this review has not spent much time with this camera because they state the 4K video as a strength of the camera - but dozens of other reviews point out the camera quick shutdown and needing to cool down for some time when shooting 4K video.

Made by DonaldS1000 on 9 Oct 2020 4:45AM, join in and reply to this comment!  Reply

ChrisV
Having compared the R6 against tests of other marques at higher ISOs it does appear to be competitive in terms of performance. I don't know what's going on with the images in this review - perhaps noise reduction was set to high - a massive amount of detail seems to be smeared away at ISO25600.

As for the term 'usable' that's a pretty moveable feast isn't it? You could argue the preposterous ISO 3m+ output from the Nikon flagships is usable for certain applications, but they're the sort of 'image' you could arrive at by taking an underexposed image captured at ISO 12800 and banging on the equivalent number of exposure boost in Photoshop. The main aim being to claim bagging rights for maximum sensitivity when it really is of no practical value.

Doing the comparisons it did shock me a little that the size for size output R6 to Panasonic G9 [which has only a quarter of the sensor area] the difference in performance was only a bit over one stop rather than the two you would expect. The full frame S Panasonic possibly opened up slightly more of a gap, but not by much. I'm not sure what to take from that - IBIS in the smaller format seems a tad more effective too which lessens the difference further in the right circumstances. Perhaps there are slightly more gains to be made in the larger format, noise wise? There is of course the advantage of more dynamic range and more effective subject isolation control at the trickier close quarters photography.

Made by ChrisV on 7 Oct 2020 12:45PM, join in and reply to this comment!  Reply

oselimg
High ISO performance is IMPRESSIVE. Anything at and beyond ISO 12800 for any camera brand is for documentation purposes where absolute image quality takes a step back because, capturing the moment is paramount. If a photo is usable for social media it counts as usable. Social media is a fact of life. Using very high ISO for any professional job that requires the absolute photo quality and detail capture is out of question no matter what kind of camera or brand one uses. To declare any brand that very high ISO performance of its cameras are not usable is loaded with personal agenda. usability of an image also depends on the size of final image and the platform it is used for.

Made by oselimg on 7 Oct 2020 7:55AM, join in and reply to this comment!  Reply

ChrisV

Quote:Noise performance is particularly impressive, with the camera retaining detail in images, even as the ISO speed increases.


Really? You describe the images at ISO 25,600 and perhaps even 51,200 as 'usable'. They might be usable for web, or small prints, but in the samples you've published [including the colour charts] detail is as smeary as a not particularly good smartphone image. I think it's a pretty disappointing performance - I'd like to see how it stacks up against other marques. 'Impressive' is not the word that readily springs to mind.

Made by ChrisV on 6 Oct 2020 11:35AM, join in and reply to this comment!  Reply

Borzyk
What´s about the limited recording time?

Made by Borzyk on 5 Oct 2020 1:11PM, join in and reply to this comment!  Reply

sherlob
I'm not 100% sure what lens was used for the ISO tests, but there is a marked drop off in sharpness in the corners that is notable across the ISO images which makes some aspects of the comparison difficult IMHO.

Made by sherlob on 5 Oct 2020 9:34AM, join in and reply to this comment!  Reply