GB Sports Photographer & The Panasonic LUMIX S1

DXO ONE Camera Review - Specifications

 Add Comment

DxO ONE Specifications

Max Aperturef/1.8
35mm equivalent32mm
Optical Zoom0x
Image Sensor
Pixels20.2Mp (Megapixels)
Pixels (W)No Data
Pixels (H)No Data
Sensor TypeBack-lit CMOS (B.S.I.)
Sensor Size1inch
Sensor Size (width)13.2mm
Sensor Size (height)8.8mm
Aspect Ratio
  • 3:2
LCD Monitor
LCD MonitorNo Data
Screen resolutionNo Data
Touch ScreenYes
Min Focus20cm
Focusing modes
  • Autofocus
  • Touch AF
Exposure Control
Shutter speeds shortest1/8000sec
Shutter speeds longest15sec
Bulb modeNo
Exp modes
  • Program
  • Aperture-Priority
  • Shutter-Priority
  • Manual
  • Scene modes
  • Centre-weighted - Average
  • Multi Pattern
  • Spot
ISO sensitivity100 - 51200
White balance
  • Auto
  • Outdoors/Daylight
  • Cloudy
  • Fluorescent
  • Shade
Exposure CompNo Data
Shooting Options
Continuous shootingNo Data
Movie modeYes
Video Resolution
  • 1920x1080 FullHD
Video FPS30fps
Stereo SoundNo
Optical Zoom with VideoNo
Other Features
Image StabilisationNo
Card Type
  • Micro SD
  • Micro SDHC
File Type
  • RAW
  • JPG
  • RAW + JPG
Power Source
Battery TypeIntegrated lithium ion
Battery Life (CIPA rating)200shots
Box Contents
Box ContentsDxO ONE Camera, USB Cable, Power Adapter

View Full Product Details

Support this site by shopping with one of our affiliates: Amazon UK, Amazon US, Amazon CA, ebay UK, Save 10% with Eversure Insurance.
*It doesn't cost you anything extra when you use these links, but it does support the site, helping keep ePHOTOzine free to use, thank you.

Used Photography Gear

Cameraworld The offers are provided by the Cameraworld & ePHOTOzine Partnership, see more fantastic Used Photography Gear.

Other articles you might find interesting...

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII Review
Canon Powershot G7 X Mark III Full Review
Leica V-Lux 5 Full Review
Canon Powershot G5 X II Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70 Now £169
Super-Rare Leica M3 Double-Stroke Camera To Be Auctioned In November
Kodak Announce WPZ2 Rugged Waterproof Camera
Canon Powershot G5 X Vs G5 X Mark II Comparison


josa 7 25 Czech Republic
27 Oct 2015 3:41PM
What happened to WB test images?Sad

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

sjjs 4
27 Oct 2015 7:00PM
Wow, that's some truly attrocious shooting-against-the-light performance right there. Were those OoC jpegs? If so, the engine needs some serious tweaking with firmware updates. If not, and that's all the highlight detail and contrast you can pull after post... well, then the optics are really messed up. Certainly not in the vicinity of "lens performance is good".

(Seriously, a lot of those look like screenshots from decade-old video games when "HDR" meant smearing a truckload of bloom over the entire image. Thoroughly underwhelming.)
Cymrucwtch 4 55 Wales
27 Oct 2015 7:33PM
Not too impressive for the best part of a grand.
28 Oct 2015 8:21AM

Quote:What happened to WB test images?

Hi Josa, Due to the light levels where we take our WB shots, there was quite a bit of shake as we had to take the images hand-held so the photos didn't look great. We will be updating these when we've got an adaptor we can use to attach the iPhone to a tripod.

Quote:Were those OoC jpegs?

Hi sjjs, we didn't perform any post work on the images.
ChrisV Plus
12 2.3k 26 United Kingdom
28 Oct 2015 5:42PM
Worse than I thought. DSLR quality really is a bit of an overstatement - a 1" sensor is never going to match a larger one for noise control or giving a shallow DoF except for really close subjects. I also question how much more convenient it is to carry one of these in addition to your phone rather than something like the Sony, or better still an LX100, which have the advantage of more controlability, flexibility and quality.

What I didn't anticipate is how dreadful the battery life would be - with no chance of using a spare!

To be honest I can't see myself being interested in one of these even in 12 months time when you'll be able to pick them up for under 200. When I first heard the announcement of these I thought they might suit one or two people, but I'm really struggling to imagine who that might be. I have actually used my iPhone on rare occasions in good light for certain shots for small reproduction - and it's been serviceable. I can't think this would increase that functionality enough to keep one in my pocket as opposed to a small dedicated camera of decent quality. It's a shame - the concept does have some decent things going for it.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.