Fujifim FinePix X-Pro1 Sample Photos

Sample Photos from the brand new Fujifim FinePix X-Pro1 with 18mm, 35mm and 60mm lenses (updated March 5 2012 @ 16:30).

5 Mar 2012 4:31PM by Joshua Waller | Fujifilm X-Pro1 in Mirrorless Cameras

BUY NOW FUJIFILM X-Pro1

Fujifim FinePix X-Pro1 Sample Photos: X-Pro1

Fujifilm X-Pro1

Sample Photos from the brand new Fujifim FinePix X-Pro1 and 18mm f/2.0 lens, 35mm lens and 60mm macro lens shown below:

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Lens test images

Previous Next

Fujifilm X-Pro1 ISO test images

Previous Next

Fujifilm X-Pro1 White-balance test images

Previous Next

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Sample Photos

Previous Next

Panorama | 1/60 sec | f/11.0 | 18.0 mm | ISO 200

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Photos of Equipment

Previous Next

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Specifications

Manufacturer	Fujifilm
Image Sensor
	Pixels	16.3Mp (Megapixels)
	Pixels (W)	4896
	Pixels (H)	3264
	Sensor Type	CMOS
	Sensor Size	APS-C
	Sensor Size (width)	23.6mm
	Sensor Size (height)	15.6mm
	Aspect Ratio	3:2 16:9 1:1
LCD Monitor
	LCD Monitor	3in
	Screen resolution	1,230,000
	Touch Screen	No
Focusing
	Focusing modes	Autofocus Manual Centre Spot Multi
Exposure Control
	Shutter speeds shortest	1/4000sec
	Shutter speeds longest	30sec
	Bulb mode	Yes
	Exp modes	Program Aperture-Priority Shutter-Priority Manual
	Metering	TTL
	ISO sensitivity	100 - 25600
	White balance	Manual Incandescent Fluorescent Shade
	Exposure Comp	+/-2
Viewfinder
	Viewfinder Resolution	1,440,000-dots
	Magnification	No Data
Shooting Options
	Continuous shooting	6fps
Video
	Movie mode	Yes
	Video Resolution	1920x1080 FullHD 1280x720 HD 720p
	Video FPS	24
	Stereo Sound	Yes
	Optical Zoom with Video	No Data
Other Features
	Image Stabilisation	No
Interface
	HDMI	Yes
	USB	USB 2
	Wi-Fi	No
Storage
	Card Type	SD SDHC SDXC
	File Type	RAW JPG RAW + JPG
Power Source
	Battery Type	NP-W126 Li-ion battery
	Battery Life (CIPA rating)	300shots
Box Contents
	Box Contents	Li-ion Battery NP-W126, Battery Charger BC-W126, Shoulder strap, USB cable, Body cap, Metal strap clip, Protective cover, Clip attaching tool , CD-ROM (Viewer software, RAW File Converter, Owner's manual
Dimensions
	Weight	450g
	Width	139.5mm
	Height	81.8mm
	Depth	42.5mm

View Full Product Details

Buy Now

Used Fujifilm MCEX-11 Macro Extension Tube

Like New £54

Used Fujifilm GFX 100S

Like New £3799

Used Fujifilm X100

Excellent £509

Used Fujifilm GFX 100S

Excellent £3419

Used Fujifilm GFX 100

Excellent £2909

Sell or trade used photo and video kit with MPB

With MPB you can get a free instant quote for the kit you want to sell, including a trade-in all-in-one transaction - no need for callbacks or waiting for an email quote. Then, if you decide to sell, MPB will pick up your kit with a free insured DPD collection and you’ll get paid cash into your account within days. MPB will also keep you informed about the status of your gear at every step of the way and the whole process is carbon neutral.

Sell your unwanted gear with MPB

We don't have the latest price however the link below will take you to the most relevant items.

Fujifilm X-Pro1 SEARCH

We don't have the latest price however the link below will take you to the most relevant items.

Fujifilm X-Pro1 SEARCH

We transform the way that people buy, sell and trade in photo and video kit.

USED FUJIFILM

Support this site by making a Donation, purchasing Plus Membership, or shopping with one of our affiliates: Amazon UK, Amazon US, Amazon CA, ebay UK, MPB. It doesn't cost you anything extra when you use these links, but it does support the site, helping keep ePHOTOzine free to use, thank you.

Photographs taken using the Fujifilm X-Pro1

I bet these delivery guys are heLLLL on the road

Other articles you might find interesting...

Sony A7C II Camera Review

Sony A7C R Camera Review

Panasonic Lumix S5IIX Review

Leica Q3 Camera Review

Sony Alpha A6700 Camera Review

Fujifilm X-S20 Review

Sony A6700 APS-C Camera Announced

Canon R100 Review

Comments

walkerr 21

5 Mar 2012 11:27AM

Like 0

Am I missing something here?
The spec for this body got me very excited as a cheaper Leica alternative / high quality go everywhere with me possible alternative to my current GF1.

The samples look washed out and terrible though for a camera that is claimed to surpass other large sensor compacts.

kodachrome 11 789

5 Mar 2012 12:05PM

Like 0

I already have a Fuji X10 which takes fantastic pictures, but these sample pictures from the X-Pro1 are really quite awful. I'm sure there must be some sort of explanation as to why?

I was considering dumping my big heavy DSLR & lenses for a high end intercheangable lens range finder, but, I will now reserve judgment.

Pete

walkerr 21

5 Mar 2012 12:24PM

Like 0

Quote:
I was considering dumping my big heavy DSLR & lenses for a high end intercheangable lens range finder, but, I will now reserve judgment.
Pete

I've also got well used but ageing Canon DSLR system, and slightly more recent Panasonic 4/3 but have been wondering whether to rationalise down to 1 system. This was in my peripheral view as a possible, but will need to something way better than these.

RoyChilds 15 117

5 Mar 2012 1:16PM

Like 0

Something very wrong here tried it at Focus NEC and the results were far better than this

Roy

joshwa Plus

13 927 1

5 Mar 2012 1:50PM

Like 0

We will be posting updated photos shortly.

kodachrome 11 789

5 Mar 2012 3:32PM

Like 0

Walkerr
If the Fuji X-Pro1 can produce pictures [and we need to see proof of that along with a full review] at least as good as my X10 and the XS-1 tested on this web site, then as you say there is a good case to rationalise one's system down from a DSLR. I would be more interested in the zoom option and of course if the price dropped which it should do over time. I really admire Fuji for the refreshing direction they are taking and not producing yet another DSLR or derivative. The X-Pro1 can hardly be called a 'Compact system camera' although it is a tad smaller than a DSLR, but not by much. Fuji earnt a very well respected reputation amongst studio photographers with the S5-Pro and for a while was considered one of the best cameras for portraits and Weddings.
I'm sure the X-Pro1 will uphold this fine reputation.
Pete

YoBellzaa Plus

16 224

5 Mar 2012 4:35PM

Like 0

New images are now uploaded.

kodachrome 11 789

6 Mar 2012 8:16AM

Like 0

Well, they are better, but quite honestly i'm not impressed, the panorama shot has burnt out high lights and the the colours in all the out door pictures are lack lustre. Ok, it's winter and not the best conditions for showing off a cameras best performance and picture quality. The indoor shots were OK.

I think another example needs to be tested and in sunny conditions and then compared to to see if your first sample was a one off or they are all exhibiting the same trend.

Pete

walkerr 21

6 Mar 2012 8:32AM

Like 0

@kodachrome

Agree on the pano shot - not a great ad for the camera. The 'Building And Trees' sample immediately before it looks to my eye reasonably pleasing, quite good detail and range. Does seem to have quite a bit of CA, which at f11 you'd hope would be quite low (i'm no expert though, so maybe that's me looking at it wrong). If I stepped back on that one shot and said how did it compare against my APS-C canon or MFT Panasonic, I'd say fairly well - but well lit, ISO 200, 1/60 you'd pretty much hope any modern camera would get a nice clean shot.

So agree - jury is still out here, but based on these newer samples it's still on my possibles list

NikLG 18 1.7k

6 Mar 2012 9:33AM

Like 0

I agree with a lot of comments here. Those photo tests look pretty shocking, not in a 'bad camera' way, but in a 'bad photo' way. My iPhone can produce better results than most of those.
I am pretty sure ( I hope Tongue

) that it's the user not the tool, because my x10 can produce much better images....

The ISO tests look quite promising though....

krasitsky 12

6 Mar 2012 7:14PM

Like 0

Oops! Just canceled my pre-order from B&H. I already have Pentax K-5 as studio camera and Panasonic G3 for everyday... together they cost like one body from Fuji. But photos can't match K-5! The only problem of K-5 is AF speed and accuracy, but that photos from Fuji are all out of focus except studio shots =(
Need to wait for good reviews

kodachrome 11 789

7 Mar 2012 8:21AM

Like 0

When the Ephotozine review staff tested the Fuji XS-1 they gave it very high marks and used the words,
'Fantastic Picture Quality' and 'Superb picture quality' which I agreed with, so when they did a hands on preview with test pictures of the X-Pro1 I was expecting at least the same standard if not even higher, but alas no, they were worse and no where near as good as my X10 which is on a par with the XS-1. [same sensor]
I think some sort of explanation is now called for from the review staff. Is it the camera/lenses or did we have a novice taking the pictures?

Pete

joshwa Plus

13 927 1

7 Mar 2012 10:59AM

Like 0

We are carrying out further testing to see what the issue is, and once complete we will be able to post our results.

walkerr 21

7 Mar 2012 11:03AM

Like 0

Quote:We are carrying out further testing to see what the issue is, and once complete we will be able to post our results.

Cool - thanks for responding. It's clear to see there's quite a few of us who are really hoping this camera will shine in terms of IQ (even if our wallets may regret it).

kodachrome 11 789

7 Mar 2012 11:06AM

Like 0

Thanks joshwa

There was no disrespect intended towards any of your staff, we just need to sort out why we see sub standard pictures from a high end camera especially as other cheaper 'X' models in the same series are at least on published pictures out performing it in picture quality.

Cheers
Pete

joshwa Plus

13 927 1

7 Mar 2012 1:15PM

Like 0

We have added sample photos from each lens at each aperture setting, and will be updating the sample images as we put together the full review of the camera system:

https://www.ephotozine.com/article/fujifilm-xf-18mm-f-2-0-r-lens-sample-photos-18696
https://www.ephotozine.com/article/fujifilm-xf-35mm-f-1-4-lens-sample-photos-18693
https://www.ephotozine.com/article/fujifilm-xf-60mm-macro-f-2-4-lens-sample-photos-18690

walkerr 21

7 Mar 2012 1:19PM

Like 0

Starting to look much nicer. Watch face detail looks pretty darned good to me.

NocturNalis 11

7 Mar 2012 2:39PM

Like 0

Sorry but I'm not impressed. There's some sharp detail in a couple photos but overall they look washed out and lacking in dynamic range. From the looks of it, I could take better photos with my KR with kit lens. Even the colors don't seem to have that classic Fuji quality as seen in the S-series dslrs and there is some pretty obvious color fringing in the corners of the 18mm lens. I will reserve judgement until a later time but Olympus's digital OM is looking better by the minute.

NocturNalis 11

7 Mar 2012 3:07PM

Like 0

Ok, just checked out the new lens sample photos and they are looking really nice and razor sharp. You guys should repost some new photos on this page because they don't do this camera any justice compared to lens sample photos. That watch pops off the screen!

walkerr 21

7 Mar 2012 3:12PM

Like 0

Gonna be a tricky one now - there's more zooms in MFT, and I have couple lenses already, which makes the OM-D attractive. The Fuji has a lot of appeal tho

kodachrome 11 789

7 Mar 2012 4:02PM

Like 0

Yes, the pictures look better and the watch faces good but not class leading and certainly not reflecting the body and lens price. I will wait judgement after I see some nice landscapes in good weather and that famous Fuji 'Velvia' colour.
I desperately wanted to get away from the DSLR culture and still have a system camera, the Fuji X-Pro1 looked like the answer, but not just yet!!??

This camera is not having a good start in life and I will be interested to see other reviews to see if it exhibits the same disappointing images.

Pete