Claim 3 FREE professional prints with Fujifilm

Laowa C-Dreamer 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D Review

John Riley reviews the Laowa C-Dreamer 9mm f/2.8 ZERO-D ultra-wide angle and compact lens for APS-C mirrorless cameras.

|  Venus Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D in Interchangeable Lenses
 Add Comment

Handling and Features
Laowa 9mm F2,8 Zero D Front Oblique View

Here we have yet another groundbreaking lens from Laowa Venus Optics, the C-Dreamer 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D for APS-C format. This is a very, very wide lens and to achieve the same field of view we would need something like a 13.5mm lens in 35mm-format terms. This becomes all the more extraordinary when we consider that it is also billed as having Zero-D, that is, zero distortion. So let's have a closer look at how this manual focus lens behaves, and performs, using the Sony Alpha A5100 24mp body.


One image can change us.

A picture, a moment can change the way we feel. Change how we see ourselves. Change our understanding and change the rules. Provoke and change history.

MPB Gear

MPB puts photo and video kit into more hands, more sustainably. Every month, visual storytellers sell more than 20,000 cameras and lenses to MPB. Choose used and get affordable access to kit that doesn’t cost the earth.

Sell the kit you’re not using to MPB. Trade in for the kit you need to create. Buy used, spend less and get more.

Buy. Sell. Trade. Create.

MPB Start Shopping

Laowa C-Dreamer 9mm f/2.8 ZERO-D Handling and Features

Laowa 9mm F2,8 Zero D Vertical View

The overall look and feel of the lens suggests high quality, the 215g weight is due to the metal and glass construction, despite this being a very tiny lens indeed. The metal lens hood bayonets into position with good precision. There is no click stop to hold the hood, but the tension is such that it is very unlikely to move out of true in use. Within the bayonet fit of the hood is a standard 49mm filter thread.

The front element is very small with this design and coated with Laowa's FEC (Frog Eye Coating) which repels grease, dirt and moisture. The lens elements are all multi-coated.

The manual focus ring is adequately sized, within the limitations of the overall diminutive size of the lens. The action is not the silky smooth that many manual systems have, but a rougher feel. However, this feel is also consistent and without any tight or loose spots. It is also not too tight, just right for making a balance between ease of use and security that the distance cannot be inadvertently changed. There is a well spaced and clear depth of field scale, which for this lens is really essential.

As regards manual focusing, this is possible with ease if the magnified image is used on the A5100. If the standard display were to be used, then focusing would be pretty much impossible. The depth of field scale can come to our aid though as there is so much DOF to take advantage of. For example, at f/11 depth of field extends from infinity down to about 0.2 metres, or 0.7 feet. A snapshot setting like this enables some amazing camera angles to be employed, which along with the wide field of view suggests some exciting creative possibilities. Focusing is down to 12cm, a maximum magnification of 0.13x, or 1:7.5. Focusing operates in the direction of traditional Nikon or Pentax manual focus lenses.

The aperture ring is smooth in operation and has positive click stops at one stop intervals. The spacing of these is not even, so using half stops is achievable up to f/11, thereafter the spacing being too close to use reliably. The ring operates in the same direction as traditional Canon manual focus lenses.

Laowa 9mm F2,8 Zero D With Hood On Sony A5100

Optical construction comprises 15 elements in 10 groups, including 2 Aspherical and 3 ED (Extra Low Dispersion). The diaphragm consists of 7 blades.

The lens is available in Fuji X, Sony E and Canon EF-M mounts. The Sony E mount provided for this review fitted perfectly, with no roughness or play whatsoever.

Manual focus in bright outdoor conditions does prove to be something of a problem in that the camera screen is virtually impossible to see clearly. A tripod and black cloth might hark back to the 1800s, but would work very well. However, using the hyperfocal distance on the lens, aided by the DOF scale, a smallish aperture such as f/8 would yield sharp images every time. Composition may still be tricky under the brightest light, but it does work and in duller light things come into their own and the lens is absolutely a doddle to use.

Laowa 9mm F2,8 Zero D Rear Oblique View

Laowa C-Dreamer 9mm f/2.8 ZERO-D Performance

Centrally, sharpness is excellent at open aperture, f/2.8. It becomes outstanding at f/4 and f/5.6, excellent at f/8 and f/11, very good at f/16 and still good at f/22.

Edge sharpness is not at the same level, being soft at f/2.8, fair at f/4, but crisping up to being very good from f/5.6 through to f/11. Thereafter, diffraction hits and results are only fair at f/16 and soft at f/22.

Of course, ultra-wide lenses are not intended for shooting flat test charts, and at more normal distances and with more normal subjects images certainly look crisp enough.

Venus Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D MTF Charts

How to read our MTF charts

The blue column represents readings from the centre of the picture frame at the various apertures and the green is from the edges.

The scale on the left side is an indication of actual image resolution as LW/PH and is described in detail above. The taller the column, the better the lens performance.

For this review, the lens was tested on a Sony Alpha A5100 using Imatest.

CA (Chromatic Aberration) is very well controlled, especially at the centre, where it is generally held to less than one-third of a pixel. The edges are also well corrected to well under 1 pixel. In normal use, CA will not be a problem, but in any event, it can be further reduced in software if necessary.

Venus Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D Chromatic Aberration Charts

How to read our CA charts

Chromatic aberration (CA) is the lens' inability to focus on the sensor or film all colours of visible light at the same point. Severe chromatic aberration gives a noticeable fringing or a halo effect around sharp edges within the picture. It can be cured in software.

Apochromatic lenses have special lens elements (aspheric, extra-low dispersion etc) to minimize the problem, hence they usually cost more.

For this review, the lens was tested on a Sony Alpha A5100 using Imatest.


The ZERO-D designation of the lens suggests zero distortion and although we can actually measure -0.59% barrel distortion, this is really an excellent result for such a wide lens.

Flare control is brilliant, and even overtly against the light shots with the sun in the frame do nothing to faze the Laowa lens. Maybe in the most extreme circumstances a small amount of haziness can creep into edges, but it's quibbling and for normal subject matter there is no flare.

Bokeh is hardly the raison d'etre of the ultra-wide lens, but in this case, where out of focus backgrounds can be induced, they are very well reproduced, with excellent, smooth gradation of tones.

Venus Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D Sample Photos


Venus Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D Aperture range


Value For Money

The Laowa C-Dreamer 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D FE lens is priced at £499. Looking at the tiny optic the first reaction may well be that the price is high for so little, but once we look closely at its features and how they relate to its performance then the VFM equation starts to look more favourable.

So, are there any rectilinear lenses as wide as this for APS-C format? Not that I can see, but there are some lenses that give us 10mm.

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 10-24mm f/4R OIS, £879
Samyang 10mm f/2.8 ED AS NCS CS, £379
Sony E 10-18mm f/4 OSS, £699
Voigtlander Heliar 10mm f/5.6 Hyper-Wide, E-mount, £799

So it's really a matter of whether or not we need the 9mm focal length and the f/2.8 aperture, and if we do then the answer is clear. For more options have a look at the Top 15 Best Sony E / FE Mount Lenses or the Top 28 Wide-angle Landscape Lenses.



Laowa C-Dreamer 9mm f/2.8 ZERO-D Verdict

The Laowa lenses as a range are certainly very interesting, sometimes unique and always deliver the goods in terms of performance. Traditional metal construction does mean a higher price, but we have to choose whether the trade-off of quality of results balances out the cost/performance equation. This will obviously be different for different users.

What we get is the widest lens in its class, with a fast, bright f/2.8 aperture, that performs very well indeed.

Laowa C-Dreamer 9mm f/2.8 ZERO-D Pros

  • Outstanding central sharpness
  • Low CA
  • Low distortion
  • No flare
  • Widest view in class
  • High-quality traditional construction
  • Very compact

Laowa C-Dreamer 9mm f/2.8 ZERO-D Cons

  • Manual focus tricky in bright light
  • No weather sealing
  • Relatively high price

Overall Verdict


Venus Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D Specifications

Lens Mounts
  • Sony E Mount
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • Canon EOS M
Focal Length9mm
Angle of View113°
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/22
Filter Size49mm
35mm equivalent13.5mm
Internal focusingNo Data
Maximum magnification0.13x
Min Focus12cm
Box Contents
Box ContentsDetachable lens hood included

View Full Product Details

MPB Start Shopping

Support this site by making a Donation, purchasing Plus Membership, or shopping with one of our affiliates: Amazon UK, Amazon US, Amazon CA, ebay UK, MPB.

It doesn't cost you anything extra when you use these links, but it does support the site, helping keep ePHOTOzine free to use, thank you.

Other articles you might find interesting...

Canon RF 100-400mm F/5.6-8 IS USM Lens Review
NIKKOR Z 800mm F/6.3 VR S Lens Review
Samyang AF 50mm f/1.4 FE II Lens Review
Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Lens Review
Lomography Daguerreotype Achromat 2.9/64 Art Lens Update Announced
Meike Introduce 7.5mm F/2.8 APS-C Manual Focus Fisheye Lens
A New Micro Four Thirds Ultra-Wide Angle Lens From Panasonic
Sony Updates Popular Sony FE 24-70mm F/2.8 GM Lens With 'Version 2'


Ichiru 4
13 Apr 2018 1:35AM
Thank you very much for this review! My knowledge of optics is limited but I was wondering if you would know whether perhaps the sharpness may have scored better at f2.8 if you had refocused in the periphery? I understand this is not proper 'testing' procedure, I am simply curious. This lens appears to suffer from pretty terrible field curvature... it seems as though the sudden jump in sharpness from f4 to f5.6 is due to the corner of the image suddenly becoming focused through a wider depth of field. I haven't bought this lens yet I am only thinking this after watching Chrisopher Frost's review on youtube. Please let me know what you think Smile.

Thanks again! I look forward to all your lens reviews!
13 Apr 2018 9:48AM
Certainly, ultra wide lenses are not really designed for making images of flat test targets and the results at longer distances are quite likely to be better. The overall rating for performance tries to take these things into account and there's no doubt that the lens produced some really nice crisp images.

Hope that answers your question!
Ichiru 4
13 Apr 2018 11:51AM

Quote:Certainly, ultra wide lenses are not really designed for making images of flat test targets and the results at longer distances are quite likely to be better. The overall rating for performance tries to take these things into account and there's no doubt that the lens produced some really nice crisp images.

Hope that answers your question!

Yes, that's pretty much what I was wondering Smile. Thanks!
ElSid 14 11 United Kingdom
16 Apr 2018 5:34PM
I think you are being a little unfair describing the focusing issue as a con when the review clearly states 'Manual focus in bright outdoor conditions does prove to be something of a problem in that the camera screen is virtually impossible to see clearly.' - the focus issue is not the fault of the lens but a fault common to all cameras that use or can use the rear screen to focus and compose. This is why I won't buy any mirrorless camera that fails to include a viewfinder.

Advising that the lens is best used with a viewfinder would be far more honest surely...
16 Apr 2018 6:54PM
It's obvious what is being said though, and as you note may cameras do not have a viewfinder. The upside is that the hyperfocal distance can be used to avoid having to focus at all. With some lenses that can be the best way, but it does depend on the camera body being used what technique suits best.
agp1337 4 1
24 Apr 2019 7:53AM
I sold my Pentax full-frame because of the weight, and went Fuji XT3. Absolutely no regrets, except that there is no superwide lens for it., and after using the 11mm Irix (wonderful lens) on the Pentax I really miss it. I have the Fuji 10-24, also excellent, but for that little bit extra I got this. Really happy with it. Punchy, sharp images and no distortion. it is not as stunning as the Irix, but few lenses are!

Note that there is a fisheye for the Fuji, but I don't like fisheyes, and when distortion is corrected in Lightroom the edges are blurred. I admit I would like the 8-16mm, but that is beyond my budget and in any case is heavy, which is why I got rid of the Pentax.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.