Gary Wolstenholme reviews the telephoto zoom Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G AF-S VR Nikkor Lens.
| Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G VR in Interchangeable Lenses
Performance
Verdict
Specification

This telephoto zoom lens costs around £440 and covers the popular 70-300mm range plus it sports Vibration reduction and a silent wave focusing motor.
Both Sigma and Tamron also produce 70-300mm lenses which include image stabilisation. Sigma's 70-300mm F/4-5.6 DG OS costs around £300, but lacks the silent focusing of the Nikon lens.
Tamron's SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 sports a fast silent focusing motor and vibration correction and costs around £350.
Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G AF-S VR Nikkor Handling and Features
Weighing 745grams, this lens is neither lightweight or overly heavy for a telephoto lens of this type and it balances well on the Nikon D700 used for testing. A large rubberised grip around the zoom ring dominates the exterior finish of the lens and provides plenty of space to hold the lens securely.
Build quality is good for a lens at this price point. The exterior of the lens barrel is mostly made of high quality plastics, and although it isn’t weather sealed, it has a rubber gasket around the lens mount to prevent to ingress of dust and moisture.
The lens takes 67mm filters, which is an uncommon size for Nikon lenses. This may mean a stepping ring will have to be used to enable filters from other lenses to fitted. As focus is performed internally, the filter thread does not rotate, which makes this lens ideal for use with polarising and graduated filters.
Nikon promise that the Vibration reduction system this lens is equipped with will allow sharp shots to be taken hand held at shutter speeds up to four stops slower than would be possible without aid. With this system enabled, I am able to take acceptably sharp hand held shots about half the time at 1/40sec, which is just a little faster than the four stops quoted by Nikon. Increasing the shutter speed to 1/60sec greatly improves my chances of achieving a sharp shot, with almost every shot being absent of camera shake.
Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G AF-S VR Nikkor Performance
As is often the case with high ratio zooms, this lens starts off very sharp at 70mm. In fact the sharpness is excellent in the centre and very good towards the edges when shooting wide open.
Peak quality across the frame is achieved between f/5.6 and f/8 where sharpness is also excellent in the centre and very good towards the edges.
With the lens zoomed to 135mm the excellent sharpness in the centre is maintained at maximum aperture, but the quality towards the edges drops to fairly good levels. Stopping the lens down improves the clarity towards the edges, but it doesn't reach good levels until f/11.
At 300mm sharpness decreases somewhat and is only fairly good in the centre at f/5.6, and fair towards the edges. As the lens is stopped down, sharpness increases until f/11, where the clarity achieved is very good in the centre and good towards the edges.
70mm | 135mm |
![]() |
![]() |
300mm |
How to read our graphs |
![]() |
The blue column represents readings from the centre of the picture frame at the various apertures and the green is from the edges. Averaging them out gives the red weighted column. The scale on the left side is an indication of actual image resolution. The taller the column, the better the lens performance. Simple. For this review, the lens was tested on a Nikon D700 using Imatest. |
At shorter focal lengths, chromatic aberrations are well controlled and won't pose an issue, even at large print sizes. However, at 300mm, levels of fringing towards the edges of the frame exceeds three pixel widths in size, which may be visible along high contrast edges.
70mm | 135mm |
![]() |
![]() |
300mm |
How to read our graphs |
![]() |
Chromatic aberration is the lens' inability to focus on the sensor or film all colours of visible light at the same point. Severe chromatic aberration gives a noticeable fringing or a halo effect around sharp edges within the picture. It can be cured in software. Apochromatic lenses have special lens elements (aspheric, extra-low dispersion etc) to minimize the problem, hence they usually cost more. For this review, the lens was tested on a Nikon D700 using Imatest. |
2.37% barrel distortion is present at 70mm and 1.53% pincushion distortion at 300mm. For most applications, these mild levels of distortion won't pose any issues. It will only become apparent where there are straight lines parallel to the edges of the frame. If perfectly straight lines are paramount, the distortion should be simple enough to correct in image editing software afterwards as the distortion pattern is uniform across the frame.
A deep circular hood comes supplied with the lens, which does an excellent job of shielding the optics from extraneous light that may cause flare or loss of contrast. When shooting directly at a strong light source, this lens can be prone to a reduction of contrast, so care may need to be taken in those circumstances.
Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G AF-S VR Nikkor Verdict
This lens performs well throughout the zoom range, especially at shorter focal lengths in the centre of the frame. At 300mm stopping down the lens a little will produce the best results. With a price tag of £440 this lens represents good value, due to its good sharpness, build quality and the useful Vibration Reduction feature.
![]() |
The Nikon 70-300mm VR lens represents good value, due to its good sharpness, build quality and the useful Vibration Reduction feature. |
Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G AF-S VR Nikkor Pros



Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G AF-S VR Nikkor Cons


FEATURES | ![]() |
HANDLING | ![]() |
PERFORMANCE | ![]() |
VALUE FOR MONEY | ![]() |
OVERALL | ![]() |
Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G AF-S VR Nikkor Specification
Price | £440 |
Contact | www.nikon.co.uk |
Filter size | 67mm |
Format | Full-frame |
Construction | 17 elements in 12 groups |
Angle-of-view | 34°20' |
35mm equivalent focal length (on APS-C body) | 105mm-450mm |
Internal focusing | Yes |
Image stabilisation | Yes |
Minimum focus | 1.5m |
Maximum aperture | f/4.5-5.6 |
Minimum aperture | f/32-40 |
Weight | 745g |
Size (lxw) | 80 x 143.5mm |
In the box | Lens hood, soft case |
Buy Now
Sell or trade used photo and video kit with MPB
With MPB you can get a free instant quote for the kit you want to sell, including a trade-in all-in-one transaction - no need for callbacks or waiting for an email quote. Then, if you decide to sell, MPB will pick up your kit with a free insured DPD collection and you’ll get paid cash into your account within days. MPB will also keep you informed about the status of your gear at every step of the way and the whole process is carbon neutral.
![]() We don't have the latest price however the link below will take you to the most relevant items. Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G VR SEARCH |
![]() We don't have the latest price however the link below will take you to the most relevant items. Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G VR SEARCH |
Support this site by purchasing Plus Membership, or shopping with one of our affiliates: Amazon UK, Amazon US, Amazon CA, ebay UK, MPB. It doesn't cost you anything extra when you use these links, but it does support the site, helping keep ePHOTOzine free to use, thank you.
I'm pleased to see the test/review bears out my experience with this item, I'd recommend it too and of course on APS sized sensors its equivalent to a 400mm lens.
Mark
I, like it seems Witchcraft, did have to do a double take at the 67mm filter size being uncommon comment. As well as the two lenses mentioned, the 16-85mm lens is also has a 67mm filter.
I've found the 16-85mm and 70-300mm combination perfect, with a nice overlap. And having the same filter size cuts down on multiple filters, and/ step down rings.
The 70-300 is a great lens in this price range, and although it is slightly more expensive than the rest, it regularly comes out on top of the competition when I've read reviews. Regardless of that though, I've still found it to be quality, and my price and size limit.
Quote:I, like it seems Witchcraft, did have to do a double take at the 67mm filter size being uncommon comment. As well as the two lenses mentioned, the 16-85mm lens is also has a 67mm filter.
Indeed. Really I should have said less common rather than uncommon, as there's only 3-4 lenses currently using that filter size. To my knowledge most Nikon lenses still use 52mm, 62mm and 77mm filter sizes, with the occasional lens using 72mm filters. As more consumer grade lenses are released with a 67mm filter thread, I'm sure this will change over time.
Quote:Interesting this one. I own both this lens and the far cheaper G non-VR 70-300 and find the cheaper lens better in several important aspects. It is much lighter; it is much, much cheaper; it is f/4 max v. F/4.5; and it is, most surprisingly, actually slightly sharper than my VR version in general use. To be honest, I wish I had saved £300 and not 'up'-graded.
That's interesting. As I've used the older D version myself and found this newer version performs much better, especially at 300mm. Maybe you have a wonky version of the new one, or were particular;y lucky with the older lens?
but am now serious about getting under the hood of this lens and making it work for me.
Am finding a softness while shooting wide open at 300 not seen before by other cams and lenses I own.
Awesome review, thank you
M
You must be a member to leave a comment.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Join for free
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
ADVERTISEMENT