The lens many Nikon photographers have been waiting for, an ultra wide-angle professional quality zoom lens with a constant aperture of F/4, Nano-Crystal lens coatings and Vibration Reduction.
| Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR in Interchangeable Lenses
Performance
Verdict
Specification
![]() |
Being the first of its kind, Nikon's new 16-35mm f/4 ultra-wide zoom, selling for £879, has garnered quite a lot of interest, especially from those who wish to use filters for landscape work, as Nikon's current top-line ultra-wide, the 14-24mm F/2.8 can't accept filters. Nikon users have been crying out for lenses like this to rival Canon's range of f/4 aperture professional lenses for ages. Here we'll take a close look at how it performs.
This particular optic costs around £880 has a constant aperture of f/4, Nano-Crystal coatings to help reduce ghosting and flare and Vibration Reduction, which Nikon claim will allows sharp shots to be achieved at shutter speeds up to 4 stops slower than without. This lens can be used with Nikon's FX or DX sensor cameras. On a DX camera the lens will provide an angle of view equivalent to that of a 24-52.5mm lens on a full-frame camera.
Nikon AF-S 16-35mm F/4G ED VR: Handling and features
Typical of Nikon's professional grade lenses, the build quality is very good, but in this case the lens isn't overly large or heavy. At 125mm long, it's only a bit larger than Nikon's diminutive, but rather old 20-35mm f/2.8 and the weight of 685g makes it balance extremely well on my Nikon D700 with or without the optional MB-D10 grip.
High quality plastics have been employed for most of the construction which have a textured finish that shouldn't show marks easily. The lens accepts 77mm filters on the front of the lens, which will please a lot of photographers interested in shooting landscapes. The filter thread is plastic but I didn't have any issues with metal filters cross-threading during use. A petal shaped hood and soft lens case are provided in the box.
Zooming is controlled by the wide rubber grip closest to the camera body. There is plenty of resistance to ensure zoom creep isn't an issue and although the mechanism seems quite smooth on this sample, zooming the lens in and out makes quite an audible hollow noise. I didn't find this too disturbing in use though.
The lens doesn't extend during focus or zooming as the front element moves back and forth inside the lens body. I found autofocus to be very quick, accurate and virtually silent thanks to Nikon Silent Wave focusing motor. Manual focus adjustments can be made at any time, but this is a feature I would rarely use on a lens as wide as this.
Nikon AF-S 16-35mm F/4G ED VR: Performance
For this review, the lens was tested on a 12Mp Nikon D700 using Imatest.
Throughout the zoom range, this lens is capable of good to excellent resolution across the frame. Wide open at 16mm the lens performs very well in the centre with the corners being slightly less sharp, but still very good. Peak performance at 16mm is achieved at f/5.6, where the resolution is approaching excellent across the frame. This lens seems to suffer with softening due to diffraction a little more than similar lenses I've tested, with the resolution steadily dropping off as the lens is stopped down after f/5.6 although it is still performs well enough at f/16. f/22 shows a marked loss of contrast and resolution compared to other apertures.
At 24mm, the lens appears to be at its best, with excellent resolution being recorded between f/4 and f/8. Still the lens suffers in the same way as at 16mm with diffraction but is still good down to f/16.
By 35mm, the resolution drops off a little, especially towards the edges of the frame. At f/4, the sharpness in the centre of the image is very good, but edges of the frame are a fair bit softer. The quality towards the edges of the frame gradually improves as the lens is stopped down and peak quality across the frame is achieved between f/8 and f/11.
Colour aberrations are kept in check well by this optic. They are at their highest levels at 16mm and f/4, where fringing can cover up to 0.6 pixel widths. This will rarely be noticeable, even upon close inspection. As the lens is zoomed in, the levels of CA fall to very low levels indeed.
At 16mm and f/4, light falloff towards the corners of the image is quite pronounced. Here the corners are 2.2stops darker than the image centre, and the lens needs to be stopped all the way down to f/8 for visibly even illumination. At 35mm this optic fairs better as the corners of the image are only 1.24 stops darker than the centre at f/4. Stopping down to f/5.6 provides visibly even illumination.
Distortion at 16mm is quite pronounced and may cause issues to those requiring straight lines in their images. Imatest recorded barrel distortion of 7.57% at 16mm, luckily the distortion pattern is uniform, so it should be quite easy to correct in image editing software afterwards. By 35mm, distortion is controlled much better. Imatest recorded 0.6% pincushion here, which should pose few issues in normal use.
As with other lenses Nikon's Nano Crystal coating do a very good job of keeping flare to a minimum. Strong point sources of light in the frame may cause a little flare in extreme circumstances, but flare will not be an issue most of the time. Strong light sources just outside of the frame may cause a slight drop in contrast, but again this will only pose issues in extreme circumstances.
The VR system fitted to this lens promises to allow handheld photography at shutter speeds up to 4 stops slower than would be possible with the system switched off. At 16mm, I managed sharp shots about 3 times out of 4 at a quarter of a second, which is about two stops slower than the focal length should allow and the same consistency at an eighth of a second at 35mm. Even if I couldn't achieve the advertised four stops, such a slow shutter speed should make this lens suitable for photographing static subjects in very low light conditions without a support, which may come in handy for travel.
![]() |
DxOMark provides objective, independent, RAW-based image quality performance data for lenses and digital cameras to help you select the best equipment to meet your photographic needs. Visit the DxOMark website for tests performed on the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm F/4G ED VR. |
Nikon AF-S 16-35mm F/4G ED VR: Verdict
Overall this lens is a very good all round performer being capable of producing images of very good resolution, especially in the centre of the frame where the performance is excellent up to 24mm and very good thereafter. The performance in this respect isn't as stunning as the 14-24mm lens as I'd hoped, but is still very respectable indeed.
This lens' weaknesses are falloff and distortion. Distortion at 16mm is actually slightly stronger than I found on Nikon's 14-24mm at 14mm, which surprised me. If you can live with these foibles I wouldn't let this put you off this optic.
With this lens being able to accept filters, this lens should find a home in many Nikon-shooting landscape photographer's kit bags and the VR feature may open possibilities for those who wish to stop down for depth of field or take pictures in low light without a support.
This is the lens many Nikon shooters have been waiting for, and although it doesn't amaze me like the 14-24mm did, it is still a very capable professional quality lens.
Nikon AF-S 16-35mm F/4G ED VR: Pros




Nikon AF-S 16-35mm F/4G ED VR: Cons



FEATURES | ![]() |
HANDLING | ![]() |
PERFORMANCE | ![]() |
VALUE | ![]() |
OVERALL | ![]() |
Nikon AF-S 16-35mm F/4G ED VR: Lens specification
Price | £879 |
Contact | www.nikon.co.uk |
Filter size | 77mm |
Format | Full-frame |
Construction | 17 elements in 12 groups |
Angle-of-view | 107° - 63° |
35mm equivalent focal length (on APS-C body) | 24-52.5mm |
Internal focusing | Yes |
Image stabilisation | Yes |
Minimum focus | 0.28cm |
Maximum aperture | F/4 |
Minimum aperture | F/22 |
Weight | 685g |
Size | 125x82.5mm |
In the box | Lens Hood, Soft Case |
Buy Now
Sell or trade used photo and video kit with MPB
With MPB you can get a free instant quote for the kit you want to sell, including a trade-in all-in-one transaction - no need for callbacks or waiting for an email quote. Then, if you decide to sell, MPB will pick up your kit with a free insured DPD collection and you’ll get paid cash into your account within days. MPB will also keep you informed about the status of your gear at every step of the way and the whole process is carbon neutral.
![]() We don't have the latest price however the link below will take you to the most relevant items. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR SEARCH |
![]() We don't have the latest price however the link below will take you to the most relevant items. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR SEARCH |
Support this site by making a Donation, purchasing Plus Membership, or shopping with one of our affiliates: Amazon UK, Amazon US, Amazon CA, ebay UK, MPB. It doesn't cost you anything extra when you use these links, but it does support the site, helping keep ePHOTOzine free to use, thank you.
Comments
I previously had a 5D with a 17-40L. The 16-35 is easily as good if not better IMHO.
jk
I would have thought that these two lenses were more closely related than the 14-24, many people (including myself) who have the 17-35 would maybe want to update to the new lens if it was a better performer and a comparison would have helped.
I couldn't rule out a comparison review in the future, the problem may be getting hold of a 17-35mm with it being largely discontinued. I own a 20-35mm, but doubt that would be a comparison many would be looking out for.
when i uploaded the images to NX2 and pre processed the images with the exact same settings as usual i noticed how realy sharp the images were , I compared them to images taken on the 14-24 f2.8 and to be honest when looking between both of them the ones taken on the 16-35 were a tad sharper.
The one thing i did notice when comparing these two lenses was the barrel distortion, At thier widest end the 14-24 was producing straight vertical without tilting the camera which was very impressive, The 16-35 was severe barrel distortion on the verticles but can be easily corrected iether in NX2 or PHOTOSHOP.
The Nikkor 16-35 if a peach of a lens, ultra sharp, Gorgeous contrast. PS i have used this lens at 35mm for some portraits with careful compostion at the right distance its incredable allthough i use my Nikkor 105 2.8 vr for most portraits i had to give it a go . This lens is a must for the camera bag and i love using it No regrets at all selling the Nikkor 14-24.
The Nikkor 16-35 f4 VR is a quality bit of kit
Sign In
You must be a member to leave a comment.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Join For Free
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
ADVERTISEMENT