ADVERTISEMENT
Playing The Long Game: Outdoor Photography With Telezooms

Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Pro Lens Review

Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Pro Review - John Riley reviews the new Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Pro lens for full-frame Nikon Z mirrorless cameras.


| Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 Pro in Interchangeable Lenses
BUY NOW NIKON Z 24-70mm f/2.8 Pro
SEARCH AMAZON UK SEARCH AMAZON US
ADVERTISEMENT

Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Pro Lens Review: Nikon Z 24 70mm F2,8 Front Oblique View

Any new camera system, such as the Nikon Z series, needs lenses to support it and one of the most important is the high quality standard zoom. There are many fine 24-70mm f/2.8 lenses on the market, so the potential of Nikon's new Z system can perhaps be fairly judged by their new offering, the Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S lens. This promises superb performance, so let's start off our look at Z system lenses and see if it delivers that promise, and indeed if it could tempt us into a new camera system.

ADVERTISEMENT
MPB

One image can change us.

A picture, a moment can change the way we feel. Change how we see ourselves. Change our understanding and change the rules. Provoke and change history.

MPB Gear

MPB puts photo and video kit into more hands, more sustainably. Every month, visual storytellers sell more than 20,000 cameras and lenses to MPB. Choose used and get affordable access to kit that doesn’t cost the earth.

Sell the kit you’re not using to MPB. Trade in for the kit you need to create. Buy used, spend less and get more.

Buy. Sell. Trade. Create.

MPB Start Shopping

Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Handling and Features

Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Pro Lens Review: Nikon Z 24 70mm F2,8 On Z7 With Hood

Weighing in at 805g, the lens fits well with the Nikon Z7 45.4MP full frame mirrorless camera provided for this review. There is extensive use of reinforced plastics, but the construction quality is excellent and all controls operate smoothly. The lens is dust and moisture sealed, almost a requirement with current lens ranges.

Starting at the front of the lens, the supplied petal shaped lenshood bayonets securely into position. Within this bayonet is a standard 82mm diameter filter thread. The front and rear elements of the lens are fluorine coated to repel dust, grease and moisture. The lens also features Nikon's new ARNEO and nano crystal coatings, offering a high degree of resistance to flare.

Continuing towards the camera body, first up is the manual focus ring, electronic in operation and also fully usable during AF to fine tune the focus position if desired. Focusing is down to 0.38m (1.25 feet) and gives a maximum magnification of 0.22x. Behind this is the zoom ring, clearly marked at 24, 28, 35, 50 and 70mm. The exact focal length setting can be seen in the small OLED display immediately behind. This display, similar to that seen on some Zeiss lenses, initially shows NIKKOR when first switched on, but then changes to show zoom position, focus scale with depth of field indication or aperture. Which function is shown can be selected using the DISP button just to the side of the display. At this point there is also an L-Fn button, which via the camera menus can be assigned to offer up to 21 different custom functions.

Returning to the OLED display, it is certainly useful from a lens testing perspective to be able to select the focal length accurately. It is also a very visible way of showing the aperture in use should this option be chosen. When we look at the distance/DOF option though, the practicality of this is limited. The DOF is indicated by a line that expands and contracts to show the range against the distance scale, but sadly that scale is so short and bereft of actual numbers that it is doubtful that it is actually much use. The principle though is spot on, and somewhat reminiscent of the manual version of this found on Rolleiflex TLR cameras as far back as the 1950s.

There is one final control ring, close to the camera body. This can be programmed to adjust focus, aperture or exposure compensation, depending upon how the photographer wishes to work. This could be useful when making quick adjustments. Just behind this ring we find the AF/MF switch. If a selection is made in camera instead, that will override the lens setting. So, for example, if the camera is set at MF then the lens will not autofocus on either setting.

Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Pro Lens Review: Nikon Z 24 70mm F2,8 On Z7 At 70mm

Optical construction is 17 elements in 15 groups, including 2 ED (Extra Low Dispersion) and 4 Aspherical. There is a 9 bladed diaphragm with rounded blades, aimed to improve the bokeh of the images, the smoothness of the out of focus areas.

In terms of ergonomics, the lens is spot on and all the controls are perfectly placed. Rings turn smoothly, but firmly enough so that they are not prone to being accidentally moved. The OLED display is nice and has some functional merit, but is by no means essential. All in all though, we have here a lens which is extremely satisfactory in use and does the job very efficiently.

Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Pro Lens Review: Nikon Z 24 70mm F2,8 Rear Oblique View


Buy Now

MPB

Sell or trade used photo and video kit with MPB

With MPB you can get a free instant quote for the kit you want to sell, including a trade-in all-in-one transaction - no need for callbacks or waiting for an email quote. Then, if you decide to sell, MPB will pick up your kit with a free insured DPD collection and you’ll get paid cash into your account within days. MPB will also keep you informed about the status of your gear at every step of the way and the whole process is carbon neutral.

Sell your unwanted gear with MPB

Amazon UK Logo

We don't have the latest price however the link below will take you to the most relevant items.

Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 Pro SEARCH
Amazon US Logo

We don't have the latest price however the link below will take you to the most relevant items.

Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 Pro SEARCH
MPB Logo

We transform the way that people buy, sell and trade in photo and video kit.

USED NIKON

Support this site by making a Donation, purchasing Plus Membership, or shopping with one of our affiliates: Amazon UK, Amazon US, Amazon CA, ebay UK, MPB. It doesn't cost you anything extra when you use these links, but it does support the site, helping keep ePHOTOzine free to use, thank you.

ADVERTISEMENT

Other articles you might find interesting...

Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II Lens Review
Sigma AF 23mm f/1.4 Lens Review - X Mount
Sigma AF 100-400mm f/5-6.3 Lens Review - X Mount
Nikon Z 70-180mm f/2.8 Lens Review
NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena Lens Announced
Nikkor Z DX 24mm F/1.7 Lens Review
Fujifilm XF 8mm F/3.5 Review
Best Third Party Nikon F Lenses (DSLR)

Comments

LenShepherd Avatar
LenShepherd 15 4.7k United Kingdom
22 May 2019 12:20PM
A minor detail - Nikon has reduced the price of several bodies and lenses - including this one - over the last week.
The current price is very close to £2,000.
mediaman Avatar
mediaman 13 14 Scotland
22 May 2019 1:36PM
It would have been of interest to me knowing that if upgrading to a Z7, If my Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 G AF-S ED Lens is worth being replaced by the new Nikon Z 24-70mm f2.8 S Lens. A comparison using the FTZ adapter on the Z7. would,I feel, be of great interest to many Nikon users.
LenShepherd Avatar
LenShepherd 15 4.7k United Kingdom
22 May 2019 5:40PM

Quote:If my Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 G AF-S ED Lens is worth being replaced by the new Nikon Z 24-70mm f2.8 S Lens. A comparison using the FTZ adapter on the Z7. would,I feel, be of great interest to many Nikon users.

While I agree, this is a matter for the ephotozine team
They have tested the AFS VR version https://www.ephotozine.com/article/nikon-af-s-nikkor-24-70mm-f-2-8e-ed-vr-review-28783
While the old test is on a lower resolving D810 it seems clear the S version on the Z7 is dramatically better in the corners and better overall.
Nikon said the new Z mount would lead to better optics. It seems clear from this test Nikon's promise is fulfilled.
Is it worth the upgrade?
Only you can decide if it is worthwhile for you.
I would prefer to wait for a pro grade Z body, very probably in time for next years Olympics to be held in Japan
Lance_B Avatar
Lance_B 10 3 Australia
22 May 2019 11:08PM

Quote:It would have been of interest to me knowing that if upgrading to a Z7, If my Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 G AF-S ED Lens is worth being replaced by the new Nikon Z 24-70mm f2.8 S Lens. A comparison using the FTZ adapter on the Z7. would,I feel, be of great interest to many Nikon users.


Well, that comes down to whether you can afford it or not. If you buy a Z7 and put the old F mount 24-70 f2.8G + the FTZ adapter on it, it will be a very large combo and negate any real benefit of the smaller body - if that is what you are after. Whilst I wouldn't call the new 24-70 f2.8S small, it is still much smaller and lighter than the old 24-70 f2.8G especially when you factor in the FTZ mount if you want to put it on a Z6/Z7. I own the 24-70 f2.8S and as for sharpness and resolution well, the new lens is much sharper, sharper edge to edge, sharper whether close or at distance, has beautiful overall IQ and excellent build quality. Whilst the old 24-70 f2.8G was an excellent lens for it's time, it was only reasonably sharp wide open (never great), but the new 24-70 f2.8S is as sharp side open as it is stopped down. You will be happy to shoot wide open all the time. Overall, this lens gives most primes a run for their money which can't be said of any 24-70 f2.8 type FF mounted DSLR zoom. This is a true pro spec lens and I agree completely with the Ephotozine's verdict - they pretty much always get it right. The 24-70 f2.8S lives on my Z7 now.
RonnieAG Avatar
RonnieAG Plus
13 154 119 Scotland
27 May 2019 10:33AM
I have to agree with Lancs_B's final analysis. I have been using the Z6 with the 23 - 70 lens for about a month now and the results it delivers is exceptional.
Evan_Ts Avatar
Evan_Ts 10
24 Jul 2019 2:39PM
The MTF charts on this website are strange.
Z7 sensor has a resolution of 8256*5504. That is to say the maximum measurable value of sharpness is 8256/2 (=4128) LW/PH. How can you get the sharpness of 4750+ LW/PH, even higher than the theoretical value?
joshwa Avatar
joshwa Plus
13 927 1 United Kingdom
25 Jul 2019 11:44AM
Hi Evan,

How we test our lenses can be found here, and goes in to detail on the process:
https://www.ephotozine.com/article/lens-reviews---find-out-how-we-review-lenses-33167

Thanks
Josh
LenShepherd Avatar
LenShepherd 15 4.7k United Kingdom
26 Jul 2019 2:21PM

Quote:Hi Evan,

How we test our lenses can be found here, and goes in to detail on the process:
https://www.ephotozine.com/article/lens-reviews---find-out-how-we-review-lenses-33167

Thanks
Josh


Could you kindly to update the link, please?

The image in the link shows a target separating from the "backing board" in 2 places, and of dubious contrast as the detail in the centre of each slanted Imatest panel is not defined.

There is no explanation as to whether by edge you mean the "top" edge where the most Imatest target detail is at about 10mm from the image centre on 24x36 format, or near "outer" edge at about 16 mm.

The tripod and head has relevance to an amateur on a limited budget but to me seems somewhat below a top quality set up, and especially so when testing longer focal length lens.

As I see it the link currently demonstrates a test procedure raising questions and not giving a fully credible explanation.
johnriley1uk Avatar
26 Jul 2019 6:29PM
The full answer to the question is actually far more complicated that we should get into, but Imatest assure us that figures such as delivered by the test procedure are absolutely possible.

The picture of the test target is of course merely for representation purposes and depth of field is limited so it will appear unsharp. It's just demonstrating the general idea.

"Edge" is near the long edge and is consistent with all lenses. With very long lenses there are many challenges and these are addressed appropriately depending on the lens.

Anybody interested in the theory of lens testing can look at the Imatest website, but it is a lot of technical information and much of it is beyond the relatively simple things we need to know for a review. Consistency is a major requirement and it enables us to realistically compare one lens results to another.
LenShepherd Avatar
LenShepherd 15 4.7k United Kingdom
28 Jul 2019 9:55AM

Quote:

"Edge" is near the long edge and is consistent with all lenses.


Have you made a typo?
The long edge of the frame at its centre is 12 mm from the centre of the image with 24x36 format, whereas the short edge centre is 18mm. The corner is 22mm.
I presume you do not mean to imply you measure "lines" about 10mm from centre (on 24x36) as this can be largely irrelevant to the edge lines near the shorter edge at about 16mm out or lines in the corners at about 20 mm out.


Quote:With very long lenses there are many challenges and these are addressed appropriately depending on the lens.


I agree.
Printing out a "double normal size target" makes getting the camera exactly at 90 degrees to the target with 24x36 format easier with lenses around 14mm and wider.
Filling the camera frame with an Imatest target with a 400mm requires a focus distance much too long to be practicable indoors.
Login

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join for free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.

ADVERTISEMENT