John Riley reviews the ultra-bright Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f/1.2 PRO prime lens for Micro Four Thirds cameras.
| Olympus M. Zuiko 25mm f/1.2 PRO in Interchangeable Lenses
Handling and Features
Performance
Verdict
Specification
This 25mm f/1.2 lens for Micro Four Thirds (MFT) cameras is equivalent to a 50mm f/1.2 “standard” lens in 35mm-format terms. The standard lens was for many years the lens of choice when buying a new camera, in more recent times largely replaced by the “kit zoom”. However, a growing awareness that prime lenses are light, bright and potentially of better quality than inexpensive zooms gives rise to their current popularity as a subsequent purchase. Notwithstanding the appearance of several f/0.95 optics, traditionally f/1.4 was the brightest norm and the very few f/1.2 lenses regarded as something really quite special and very expensive. It will be interesting to see how this new f/1.2 design performs, mounted for this review on a Panasonic Lumix G6 body.
Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f/1.2 PRO Handling and Features
Designated as a PRO lens, there is no doubt about the general quality of manufacture. The overall package is compact and weighs in at a reasonable 410g. It is designated as being splash and dust resistant. The round lens hood provided fits slickly and has a locking catch to make sure that it never works loose. All of this fits easily and with great precision. The bayonet hood fitting surrounds a 62mm filter thread.
A thin ring then describes the lens details, and as we travel further towards the camera body next up is an equally thin depth of field scale. Then we find the manual focus ring. If pushed forwards, this ring can be used to manually override the AF. If pulled backwards it reveals the manual focus scale and the ring operates as a manual focus ring, with traditional hard stops at each end of the focusing range. There are indications in feet and metres revealed on a thin ring forwards of the focusing ring, but because they are all in the same plane and the ring is so thin there are very few actual figures inscribed. The forwards / backwards action of the focusing ring is very light and it could usefully have a tad more friction to prevent accidental operation.
Focusing is down to 0.3m, giving a maximum magnification of 0.11x. This equates with a working distance of around 19.5cm. There are 9 rounded diaphragm blades for smoother bokeh, the quality of the out of focus areas in an image.
Finally, a solitary push button marked L-Fn will disable the AF when kept pressed. The metal MFT mount is of the highest quality and bayonets onto the camera smoothly, without any play once fitted.
A conventional 50mm f/1.2 lens for 35mm-format might be expected to have around 7 elements in 6 groups, but this 25mm f/1.2 for MFT format has a highly complex 19 elements in 14 groups, including 2 ED (Extra Low Dispersion), 1 Super ED, 3 HR (High Refractive Index), 1 Extra-HR and 1 Aspherical element. Z-Nano coatings complete the picture of a highly corrected and professional optic.
In use, apart from the possibility of accidentally switching from AF to MF and vice-versa, there is very little to go wrong. The bright f/1.2 aperture ensures a crisp point of focus and the AF system snaps into focus with speed. Using the Lumix G6 though, it was evident that the AF is not quite precise enough to make the best of the f/1.2 aperture and manual focus with focusing aids actually is more accurate. However, it takes time, so for normal use, probably stopped down anyway, AF performs well enough.
Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f/1.2 PRO Performance
Sharpness measurements probably do not do the lens full justice as the images shot at normal distances are very sharp, centre and edge. Generally, an f/1.2 lens such as this would not be expected to perform as well up close and on flat subjects such as lens testing charts.
Despite the above, at the centre sharpness is excellent from the f/1.2 open aperture and remains so right through to f/11. At f2, f/2.8 and f/4 it is pushing towards being described as outstanding. It is only at f/16 that diffraction takes its toll, but even here results are very good.
The edges do not fare quite so well in the test results, being fair at f/1.2, good at f/2 and f/2.8, but rising to very good sharpness between f/4 and f/11. It is still good at f/16 as it tails off due to diffraction.
In the field, the normal distance images show excellent sharpness centre and edge. This is a lens for real life shooting, not for fitting to extension tubes and other close up work. This is just the nature of the beast and probably inevitable in such a fast, bright lens.
How to read our MTF chartsThe blue column represents readings from the centre of the picture frame at the various apertures and the green is from the edges.The scale on the left side is an indication of actual image resolution as LW/PH and is described in detail above. The taller the column, the better the lens performance. For this review, the lens was tested on a Panasonic Lumix G6 using Imatest. |
CA (Chromatic Aberration) is very highly corrected in the centre of the field and is virtually zero. At the edges control is still very good and for most purposes good enough not to be noticed. There will be times, such as branches against bright sky, where some fringing becomes visible, but this can easily be corrected in software.
How to read our CA chartsChromatic aberration (CA) is the lens' inability to focus on the sensor or film all colours of visible light at the same point. Severe chromatic aberration gives a noticeable fringing or a halo effect around sharp edges within the picture. It can be cured in software.Apochromatic lenses have special lens elements (aspheric, extra-low dispersion etc) to minimise the problem, hence they usually cost more. For this review, the lens was tested on a Panasonic Lumix G6 using Imatest. |
Flare resistance is virtually perfect and it is not possible to even see any significant loss of contrast against the light.
Barrel distortion would be expected for an f/1.2 standard lens, and is present, but measures as a very low value of -0.312%. This is not significant, but in extreme circumstances could be corrected in software anyway.
The 9 bladed rounded diaphragm, coupled with the wide, bright apertures available, offers the potential for some wonderfully smooth bokeh, and that is exactly what is delivered. The overall “look” of the lens is very impressive.
Olympus M. Zuiko 25mm f/1.2 PRO Other sample images
Value For Money
The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 25mm f/1.2 PRO Lens is priced at £1099.
For MFT, there are various 25mm f/0.95 manual focus lenses. Choices included the Meike 25mm f/0.95 (£455), the Voigtlander 25mm f/0.95 II (£742) and the SLR-Magic 25mm T0.95 Cine lens (£579).
To put the DSLR marques in context, Nikon has the MF 50mm f/1.2 AIS (£699) and Canon offer the 50mm f/1.2L USM (£1369).
It seems that adding AF to the 25mm f/1.2 adds quite a bit to the price, but considering the complexity of the lens construction and the quality of the results, it remains fairly pitched and good VFM. For more options have a look at the Top 33 Best Micro Four Thirds Lenses.
Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f/1.2 PRO Verdict
The market for f/1.2 standard lenses gives very limited choice, especially if AF is required. However, we have here in the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 25mm f/1.2 PRO lens more than just a bright maximum aperture. It is a very fine lens in its own right, with excellent sharpness that borders on outstanding, low CA, no flare and a very pleasing bokeh. Add to that the low light potential and we have a very attractive proposition indeed.
Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f/1.2 PRO Pros
- Excellent sharpness
- Very low CA
- No flare
- Lovely bokeh
- Low distortion
- Compact lens
- Splash and dust resistant
Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f/1.2 PRO Cons
- Lower edge performance at close distances
- Light feel of AF/MF switching
- High price tag
Olympus M. Zuiko 25mm f/1.2 PRO Specifications
Manufacturer | Olympus | |
General | ||
Lens Mounts |
| |
Lens | ||
Focal Length | 25mm | |
Angle of View | 47° | |
Max Aperture | f/1.2 | |
Min Aperture | f/16 | |
Filter Size | 62mm | |
Stabilised | No | |
35mm equivalent | 50mm | |
Internal focusing | Yes | |
Maximum magnification | 0.11x | |
Focusing | ||
Min Focus | 30cm | |
Construction | ||
Blades | 9 | |
Elements | 19 | |
Groups | 14 | |
Box Contents | ||
Box Contents | No Data | |
Dimensions | ||
Weight | 410g | |
Height | 87mm |
Buy Now
Sell or trade used photo and video kit with MPB
With MPB you can get a free instant quote for the kit you want to sell, including a trade-in all-in-one transaction - no need for callbacks or waiting for an email quote. Then, if you decide to sell, MPB will pick up your kit with a free insured DPD collection and you’ll get paid cash into your account within days. MPB will also keep you informed about the status of your gear at every step of the way and the whole process is carbon neutral.
![]() We don't have the latest price however the link below will take you to the most relevant items. Olympus M. Zuiko 25mm f/1.2 PRO SEARCH |
![]() We don't have the latest price however the link below will take you to the most relevant items. Olympus M. Zuiko 25mm f/1.2 PRO SEARCH |
Support this site by making a Donation, purchasing Plus Membership, or shopping with one of our affiliates: Amazon UK, Amazon US, Amazon CA, ebay UK, MPB. It doesn't cost you anything extra when you use these links, but it does support the site, helping keep ePHOTOzine free to use, thank you.
But it isn't really, is it? I've heard all the statements of f1.2 is always f1.2, but if that's the case 25mm is always 25mm. Except it's not is it, because we look at the practical effect a lens has when it's mounted on any given body. 25mm projected onto a MFT sensor gives a field of view equivalent of 50mm in 35mm sensor terms. But at every F stop it's also giving an equivalence of 2 stops greater depth of field. Not only that, but it's also gathering [because of the sensor size] equivalent of 2 stops less light.
So it's actually more accurate to consider this lens as equivalent to a 50mm f2.4 lens in 35mm terms.
That doesn't sound so great in the comparisons any more does it? Of course that isn't the entire story and the build quality of this lens [although I hope the mount is much more sturdy than on the 12-40 Pro] and its performance should handily outdo the cheap as chips 50mm f1.8s for 35mm on the market [which will both gather more light and yield a shallower DoF on the corresponding sensor].
It's the price you have to pay for the convenience of the MFT format, but I do think the price in the case of these premium lenses from the OEMs is very steep. Especially if you consider you could buy a Sony A7RII and a 50mm f1.8 FE lens and have a considerable chunk of change over the alternative of an EM1II with this lens. But what about the overall weight? The Sony plus lens is actually 173g lighter. That's soon blown away when you go to longer zooms, but it's still considerable food for thought...
For full disclosure I am an MFT user and I've never owned a Sony ILC in my life. I do very often carry two bodies though and my above comparison has made me contemplate buying into the Sony system for shorter focal lengths, where the thing I miss most personally is ability to isolate subject. Of course it won't hurt either that I would get cleaner images in low light and more scope for crop.
Both focal length and f/no are design constants of a lens.
We don't see so called "Full Frame" lenses being derided by what they would equate to if used on a medium format sensor...
In real world terms, in a dark church interior in Florence, an Olympus camera with the 25mm f/1.2 lens on it will have shots with exactly the same exposure using exactly the same shutter speed and ISO as a full frame camera with a 50mm f/1.2 lens using the same ISO and shutter speed. The depth of field will be different, but (to belabour this point) f/1.2 is f/1.2 is f/1.2.
Now you can compare.
Quote:The depth of field will be different
You skated over that bit slightly, considering it's a major reason a person would want this. The point is, you don't need to go to the expense of f1.2, f1.2 or f1.2 for that with a larger format.
And two: the way the review is written, the clutch ring moved one way "can be used to manually override the AF" and moved the other way "operates as a manual focus ring". This is surely quite mistaken? Moved one way there is only AF operative, moved the other way there is only manual. Otherwise, what is the point?
I was simply going by the way the 'clutch' works on my Olympus 12-40 PRO lens: whatever the setting on the top of the camera (is that what you mean?) the sliding ring on the lens toggles between Manual focus and Auto focus.
Quote:A lot of positives here, but I find the CA unacceptably high. Look at the Village Architecture sample -- the roof tiles have obvious color fringing. I see this in other samples, as well. This practice of designing lenses with optical defects to be corrected with software has limits that are being exceeded in the interest of compactness. The earlier Oly 14-35mm f/2 SHG lens has about half the amount of CA (and it's a zoom lens, yet). Unless this is due to the use of a non-Oly body, for me it's no sale. I would be content with a well-corrected 25mm f/1.4 prime of similar pro construction, size, and price.
The CA isn't being caused by the Panasonic body but the Panasonic body doesn't automatically correct the CA, so it is showing up in the shots. It would be corrected had it been shot on an Olympus. I suppose doing the review with a Panasonic is a good way to show whatever flaws were designed into the lens. Perhaps that was John's intention.
You must be a member to leave a comment.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Join for free
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
ADVERTISEMENT