Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


Science Meets Fine-Art Photography In The World Of Antonia Reeve

Science Meets Fine-Art Photography In The World Of Antonia Reeve - EIZO interview photographer and science fan Antonia Reeve to see how in her world, the creative art of photography works alongside science. (Warning: images of open-heart surgery featured.)

 Add Comment

Photographers

With a background and education that took in both science and fine art, Antonia Reeve finds her photography informed by both of these seemingly disparate fields. But as she explains the technicalities behind capturing artists and their works, or the colours at play whilst photographing heart surgery, the gulf between the two seems to narrow. EIZO spoke to Reeve about capturing the intricacies of the colour play in a painting with accuracy, and how a bit of chemistry and physics can stand a photographer in good stead.

 

Jewelry

 

What are the challenges of photographing works of art?

It depends on what the artist wants when you’re working directly with them. With galleries and museums, they need to know that it’s the right colour. There are particular difficulties about certain artists’ work if they used particular pigments that don’t reproduce accurately. For instance, William McTaggart used a particular green-cyan pigment that emits infrared light which the eye can’t see, so adding green-cyan and the emitted red together and you get a brown or neutral colour on film. This means that all the colour subtlety in the stormy skies and the weight in the sea disappears, and that is a major problem. Now I’m glad to say that my Phase One back does see the green-cyan colour in McTaggart paintings.

 

paintings

 

Since your photos of an artwork will probably be seen by more people than the artwork itself, accuracy must be key?

I’ve just photographed a painting of a racehorse which was very interesting because the painter uses a shade of red, which the camera over responds to. I can’t even use colour patches to get it looking accurate at all. I have to actually manipulate it in the file afterwards.

 

You manipulate the image to make it look more truthful?

Yes. There must be something in one of the paints that the camera sensor is over sensitive to because it comes up much, much too saturated. I have asked the artist to make a set of paint patches so I can do accurate tests.

 

Paintings

 

Which monitors do you use?

I’ve used EIZO monitors for quite some time; I think I’m on about my 4th generation of them. The one I’ve just got now, which is the CG247, is just fantastic. It blows the previous ones out of the water. In the past, despite calibrating and profiling everything backwards and forwards, I couldn’t quite guarantee that I could print something that looked exactly as it did on screen. Now I can, which is great.

 

How do you know you’ve got the balance of saturation, hue, tone, light etc correct when you deliver a final image?

The National Galleries, Tate, and Galleries & Museums around the world specify linear files, which look flat, but they’ve got every tone in the picture that it’s possible to capture - all the details in the darks and all the details in the highlights. If you think of a Rembrandt you’ll get often a lot of detail in the near-blacks running right into black, but also you quite often have a white ruff and that’s got lots of details in the near whites and whites. So you’re working with an image that has the whole range across the full histogram - you can’t afford to clip anything. They then make files for printing, web etc, secure in the knowledge that all the tones are in the starting file.

 

Art

 

It sounds as though there’s a real science to photographing art. Does having an education in science as well as art help your practice?

I started when most photography was black and white, there was a little colour but it really wasn’t very accurate because the films weren’t very good. So when you’re processing film, if you can understand what’s happening on the chemistry & physics side, the graphs and the levels and so on, then that helps if using different types of chemicals to process film for different effects. So yes, the science helps there, and now also in understanding digital capture & files. 

 

And you also use science as a subject for your photography

Another area, just something that I’m interested in is medical photography. I’ve worked with several surgeons photographing their work in the operating theatre, which is very different from fine art. Although actually you still have to get the colour balance right because the nuances between the different colours of red in the flesh and the blood are very important, for instance if you’re photographing open-heart surgery.

 

Heart surgery

 

So the colour precision is actually similar to your work with art?

Yes, I usually have to use flash as well as the theatre lights so you’re getting a combination, but when the colour balance is correctly adjusted you find that suddenly you can see the different kinds of flesh as visually separate.

 

Now that you explain it, it doesn’t seem that much of a leap from your other work.

You can see from my website that I love photographing people at work, I like going into people’s studios, I like photographing skilled people doing things and visually describing the process of how they do it, so it’s just another branch of that. It stops me getting bored!

 

Science

 

Antonia's Equipment List:

  • Cameras - Phase One IQ280 & Phase DF+ camera with macro lenses through to fisheye, Canon 5D III with macros, shift lenses and L series zooms. 
  • Lighting - Balcar monoblocs and power pack with heads, Alfa linear flash tubes and 6K power packs for paintings etc.
  • Computer - Mac Pro 6core with EIZO CG247 screen. 
  • Stands, the usual accumulated accessories and useful oddments.

 

Antonia's Bio:

I can’t remember when I first used a camera - it is a natural part of my life as well as an absorbing profession. I am strongly aware of the communicative power of the still image and my photographs reflect my interest in the way people and things look and work. My scientific & artistic upbringing and education inform my photography.  An understanding of the science of photography helps me get the best out of the tools available to me. I have hands on experience in many artistic techniques, from printmaking to glassblowing, and experience in scientific methods (science degree). My understanding of artistic and scientific methods enables me to illustrate processes in such a way as to make them accessible/understandable to the viewer. I have always been fascinated by people’s skills and abilities and enjoy describing them visually so that viewers can follow the process. I like a challenge and with good communication from brief to final output, my aim is to provide the images that my clients need to bring their projects to life.

 

Visit the EIZO website for more information on their monitor range.

View Directory Page : EIZO Limited

Explore More

There are no comments here! Be the first!


Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.