The debate concerning the longevity of film and photographs viz-a-viz that of digital storage and output took a decided leap forward for the film corner when an old roll of 'ILFORD Selo Extrafinegrain Panchromatic' film was discovered which was able to produce prints of a very reasonable quality.
| Film
Although the film was very tightly rolled and was showing what appeared to be emulsion cracks, I was able to process 10 usable images, says Ellis. Judging by the cars shown in the images, which feature a campsite, I estimate these were shot in the 1950s, or possibly earlier.
The name 'Selo' first saw the light of day in 1920 when a company by that name was formed by ILFORD and two other filmmakers, Imperial and Gem, to manufacture film which each company sold under its own labels.
While the Selo company continued until 1946 when it was incorporated into ILFORD, as was Imperial and Gem, the brand continued to be used until the early 1960s on products such as Selochrome Panchromatic in 120 format. In the mid 1940s, the company was selling Selo H.P.3 film which became ILFORD HP3 some five years later and was the forerunner to today's world-renowned HP5 film.
ILFORD Photo director Simon Galley saw Mike Ellis's results: These images are quite fascinating, he comments. I agree they appear to date from the late forties/early fifties, though it is impossible to be precise.
Selo-branded film was first manufactured in 1938 but I do not know exactly when it was phased out. However, that particular roll of exposed film has obviously been lying in the cassette for over 50 years, and given that it has also probably been in the southern hemisphere all that time, I am amazed that any images were recoverable.
Given that images stored on a Flashcard would not last so long, this find emphasises the benefit of capturing images on film - especially ILFORD film - at least in the first instance. It is a lesson which modern photographers could do well to heed.
Buy Now
Support this site by making a Donation, purchasing Plus Membership, or shopping with one of our affiliates: Amazon UK, Amazon US, Amazon CA, ebay UK, MPB. It doesn't cost you anything extra when you use these links, but it does support the site, helping keep ePHOTOzine free to use, thank you.
Comments
Amen.
Film has a use-by-date, and flash has a guaranteed retention time... but it could well exceed that time, just as this Ilford film did.
ID11 is just a chemical formula; anyone with the recipe could make it, or any other B&W developer (indeed, some people still do home-brew their chemicals). Similarly Dev tanks are just light-tight boxes, and if you had a dark room you could probably find a way to just develope the film in a dish. Precision microelectronics and copyright-protected firmware may prove a little harder to cook up in your garage...
I have never really understood this argument of digital longetivity. if you keep your current pc and current s/ware in storage say, why will it suddenly be incompatable in 30yrs when you want to look through your old photos ?
The floppy is dead is always an mentioned but you can still by a drive from anywhere.
If you really like your digital photos why not have them professionally printed.
Sign In
You must be a member to leave a comment.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Join For Free
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
ADVERTISEMENT