Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


USA Landscape Photographer of the Year 2016 open to entries NOW!

Air Show Lens


helicopter 10 27
11 Jul 2012 9:21PM
I,ve just got back from Fairford airshow and realise my 70-200 is not long enough to get close ups of planes in flight, I would appreciate any suggestions as to what I should buy either Canon or after market. I am using a 7D

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Coleslaw 11 13.4k 28 Wales
11 Jul 2012 9:24PM
macroman 13 15.3k England
11 Jul 2012 9:41PM
I have a Sigma 70-300 which usually does the job.

fans-and-rotors.jpg


mustang.jpg

justin c 12 4.7k 36 England
11 Jul 2012 9:46PM
A Canon 100-400mm lens would be a good choice, if not, adding a Canon 1.4X extender to your current lens would be another option, giving a little extra reach.
Franticsmurf 14 829 Wales
11 Jul 2012 9:47PM
I used a Nikon 70-300 and a Sigma 170-500 at the local airshow last year. The 500mm was a bit too long for some of the planes when they flew close to the crowd. At full zoom, it was a handful and I wasn't using a monopod but there was plenty of light for a fast shutter speed. It gave great detail, though, and was ideal for the fast jets.
mohikan22 12 2.3k 2 United Kingdom
11 Jul 2012 9:49PM
Canon 300 F4 L
with Kenko Ext 1.5x
Sierrakitten 10 11 United Kingdom
11 Jul 2012 9:50PM
Next time, try going up to Totterdown for a day. I've had great results up there with just a 200mm. Anything longer would have been overkill. Location, location, location....Smile
Cybalist 4 21 United Kingdom
11 Jul 2012 10:30PM
-dsc5334.jpg

I use a Sigma 150-500mm on my Nikon D300S, as it's a cropped sensor I get the same field of vision as a 225-750mm lens on full-frame. It's brilliant for planes and racing cars. The attached pic was taken at 500mm, and is uncropped. I picked the lens up second hand on Ebay for about 500. The pic was taken in Twickenham so the jet was already quite high up and was just a spec to my unaided eye.
kodachrome 4 603
15 Jul 2012 8:04AM
Was it the Farnborough Air Show this week end.

Koda
helicopter 10 27
15 Jul 2012 1:16PM
what if I sell my 70-200mm and replace it with a 100-400mm L series would that be a good result ?. Comments please.
discreetphoton 11 3.5k 20 United Kingdom
15 Jul 2012 1:21PM
Get yourself a teleconverter. Then you've got the best of both worlds. Even a 1.4 takes it up to 340mm, which isn't far off the 400mm. Plenty for all but the largest airshows.
justin c 12 4.7k 36 England
15 Jul 2012 1:50PM

Quote:Even a 1.4 takes it up to 340mm,


A 1.4x extender/converter on a 200mm lens gives you 280mm




Quote:what if I sell my 70-200mm and replace it with a 100-400mm L series would that be a good result ?


That would be a good choice IMO.
mikehit 7 8.0k 13 United Kingdom
15 Jul 2012 5:23PM

Quote:Even a 1.4 takes it up to 340mm,

A 1.4x extender/converter on a 200mm lens gives you 280mm





I agree. What we are talking about here is extending the range on the camera he has got, not comparing to performance on a totally different format.
Cybalist 4 21 United Kingdom
16 Jul 2012 2:05PM
Bear in mind teleconverters drop you a couple of stops
javam 11 1.1k 19 United Kingdom
16 Jul 2012 2:53PM
If it is something you intend to do a lot of, the 100-400 is the lens to go for.

I would like a second body and a 500 or 600mm option for some things, but I need to build up the funds to do that.

You could always try hiring one for the next show you go to and see how you get on.

Before I bought the 100-400 I had the use of a friends 70-200 f2.8 IS L and 2x converter and it was not too bad a combo, but visibly softer than the 100-400.

Both are softer than the 400mm F5.6 L, but I prefer the flexibility of a zoom.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.