Save An Extra 15% On All Regatta Clearance Jackets & Coats use code: JACKET15
Compact camera for sports photography?

Quote:Fair point but missing the point.
Your average amateur can't haul a 300 2.8 into the cheap seats, so they have to use a smaller unit that they can get past security with attracting attention. On the point of the phone, why would you want to print it at A3, it's a phone but the photos will on the news blog long before they arrive from the SLR.
Horses for courses.
Again it depends on what you want surely
I consider myself an amateur even though I shoot for magazines, and earn from my work, does that mean I want second best, no, as an amateur I DO and DO carry at least a 70-200mm f2.8, why should an amateur not if they can "afford it".
Ok some can not but still the poster has not said how much they can afford, a new compact can cost as much as a pre used DSLR and tele.............
Why would you want to "get past security", no mention of that anywhere

Modern compacts have come on in leaps and bounds in recent years, they will never match a DSLR but some are still pretty usable for sport.
I won a Stylus 1 in an EPZ comp last year and its pretty surprising what it can do as a compact, it has quite a respectable 28-300mm constant f2.8 max aperture and pretty nippy focusing, its not a bad all rounder as compacts go.
I won a Stylus 1 in an EPZ comp last year and its pretty surprising what it can do as a compact, it has quite a respectable 28-300mm constant f2.8 max aperture and pretty nippy focusing, its not a bad all rounder as compacts go.

As Paul says, Stylus 1 pretty handy for this. F2.8 28 to 300 (600mm if digital *2 used).
Manual focus and exposure available.
Take a look the the F1 pics I shot at Slverstone.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/63811242@N03/sets/72157650630354585
Manual focus and exposure available.
Take a look the the F1 pics I shot at Slverstone.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/63811242@N03/sets/72157650630354585