Converting DSLR to Infra Red

I am seriously considering converting my EOS 20D to IR. I have tried using an IR filter but exposure times were 30 seconds in bright sunlight. For the average landscape the foliage move and clouds move leaving most of the image blurred. If I convert my camera to IR, I will be able to use normal exposures. It is possible to buy the parts and do it yourself and I would be resonably confident to do so. However, the saving is not that great so I am inclined to pay for the conversion. Advanced Camera Services of Norfolk have been recommended to me. Has anyone on this forum any experience of converting a DSLR to IR?
Dave
Dave
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Perhaps a tad off-topic, but I thought that longer exposures were necessary in IR because the sensor responds to IR energy, but much less so than visible light. I also thought IR conversions merely replaced the protective cover of the sensor with the equivalent of an IR filter.
Have I got it all wrong, can you please explain what I've misunderstood?
Have I got it all wrong, can you please explain what I've misunderstood?

I'm using a converted Pentax *ist D. I really like the results. My latest is uploaded yesterday in my portfolio.
I wrote about converting a DSLR to infrared in the articles section.
Quote:I also thought IR conversions merely replaced the protective cover of the sensor with the equivalent of an IR filter.
They take away the IR Cut filter. The exposures are fast, unlike when shooting through an IR filter on the lens.
I wrote about converting a DSLR to infrared in the articles section.
Quote:I also thought IR conversions merely replaced the protective cover of the sensor with the equivalent of an IR filter.
They take away the IR Cut filter. The exposures are fast, unlike when shooting through an IR filter on the lens.

I had my 20D converted and pleased that I did. It is something that I would definately recommend. There were two types available. One which is for colour/mono IR and the other if you just intend taking B&W. I was told that the latter, which I went for, produces a slightly more contrast/detail in the image but you lose the colour IR option. In reality I suspect there might not be much in it but talk to them first.
As I said, although pricey, I thought it was money well spent.
Regards
Roy
As I said, although pricey, I thought it was money well spent.
Regards
Roy

Roy thanks for that information. I have decided to defintely go ahead but had not realised that there was an option which excluded colour IR. I will look into that but I have read an excellent article on colour IR by Clive Haynes so I am tempted to go that way unless ther eis some disadvantage.
Dave
Dave