Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here

Nikon 3,D3,S D3x

PJImage 11 53 United Kingdom
22 Mar 2010 8:50AM
Has anyone heard that the replacement for the D3 series ie D4 is due later this year

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

thewilliam 9 6.1k
22 Mar 2010 9:31AM
The number 4 is very inauspicious for the Japanese and the F4 was probably the least successful of all F series cameras and has the lowest secondhand value. Just as Alollo 13 was nearly a disaster. Perhaps this is why Fuji went from the S3 to the S5.
fstopshere 8 43
22 Mar 2010 9:35AM
Yes the pictograms for the number 4 and for death are the same in japanese, so possibly '5' series?
User_Removed 16 7.3k 6 United Kingdom
22 Mar 2010 9:57AM
Also because many Japanese thought it meant it didn't cost anything Grin
LenShepherd 10 3.6k United Kingdom
22 Mar 2010 1:21PM
The replacement for the D3 is already here the D3s Smile
No word yet on a replacement for the D3x.
User_Removed 8 4.6k 1 Scotland
31 Mar 2010 11:36AM
More to the point (maybe) is when is the D700s going to appear?

We now have the D300s and the D3s. Surely the D700 will be next on the list due for an upgrade. (Should be an easy one - a D300s with a D3s sensor and processor).
LenShepherd 10 3.6k United Kingdom
4 Apr 2010 11:44AM

Quote:More to the point (maybe) is when is the D700s going to appear?

Speculation on my part but with the price drop on the D3x to 4,550 and no advertising of it, and new advertising for the D700 with no price drop the D3x could be the next body to benefit from Nikon's latest sensor technology.
filmforever 10 749
7 Apr 2010 8:01PM
Reading some of these posts, it seems that many are more concerned with having the latest bit of "jewellery" around their necks with an "s" or an "x" tagged on the end, than actually getting out and taking pictures with the gear that you've already got?
Perhaps it should be remembered that many of the most highly regarded photographers, use(d) equipment that would be considered to be years out of date.
for instance, Salgardo uses a Leica R6. ....Bailey still uses his Rolleiflex or Hasselblad.
It's pictures that count, not adorning yourself with the latest equipment.
thewilliam 9 6.1k
8 Apr 2010 1:12PM
When I'm taking pix for myself, I use old and scruffy, but very high quality, film cameras. Few people seem to take any notice. But when I'm on a professional shoot, everybody seems to take an interest.

Salgardo and Bailey are at the top for good reason.
ecowarrior 11 577 England
9 Apr 2010 9:56PM
And eco is at the bottom. For similar reasons Grin
LenShepherd 10 3.6k United Kingdom
13 Apr 2010 2:53PM

Quote:than actually getting out and taking pictures with the gear that you've already got?

This is normally a very valid comment - those who cannot get good pictures with what they have are unlikely to improve if they buy something more expensive.
I got the "s" because I could see a benefit for my wildlife work. Not the greatest video ever and only my second attempt at video but I think it makes the point for me video can be important
paperboy 8 208
13 Apr 2010 8:21PM
Nikon usually has a 4 year turn around for its' pro/ top semi-pro cameras:
D300s..2009 1/2 cycle keep the folks interested

D700s.2010 1/2 cycle (prediction for Nikon 2nd qrtr) needs video

D3s.2009 1/2 cycle keep the folks interested
D4....2011 (Nikon 2ns qrtr) more technically advanced than any D3x

Just an opinion, of course.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.